Evaluating online courses via course-related competencies – A mixed-methods quasi-experiment evaluation study of an HIV Prevention Webcourses among college students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: This convergent mixed method quasi-experiment study evaluates the effectiveness of an HIV Prevention Webcourses on reaching HIV related competencies among college students at a large public university in Florida. College students in health majors participated in the study, experiment group were students enrolled in the HIV Webcourses and comparison group were students who enrolled in non-HIV related courses from the same college. Six HIV competencies along with HIV knowledge were measured. Qualitative comments on own learning were also gathered from the experiment group of students. A total of 944 students participated (508 experimental and 436 comparison students). The reliability of the 6-item HIV competency scale showed satisfactory internal consistencies (Cronbach alpha = .914; CITCs ranged .670-.804). Regression analyses, controlling for their baseline scores, showed that students in the HIV Webcourses scored significant higher than comparison group (all p<.001) on all the six competencies. Regression analyses also showed significant differences on objective HIV knowledge test, perceived HIV knowledge in general and about HIV testing specifically between groups (p<.001). Students commented they genuinely loved this course as it was extremely well organized, very useful, interesting and informative, and enjoyed the professor’s passion of the topics. Students also commented how the personal stories and videos gave perspectives and provided life-changing lessons. Both the quantitative and qualitative data on student learnings convergently demonstrated the impact of this online course. Current study suggested effective design strategies and provided data to support the effectiveness of Webcourses on reaching course-related competencies among college students.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.