Successes and Limitations of Inquiry-Based Laboratories on Affective Learning Outcomes for Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Hearing Signing Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Active learning pedagogies such as inquiry-based learning have the potential not only to improve students’ science literacy but also promote affective learning and interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers. Moreover, a focus on affective learning may be key to improve recruitment in STEM. Yet, we know little about how participation in inquiry-based courses can impact college students’ affective learning. Here, we present results from a comparative analysis of two affective learning outcomes, attitudes toward science and science identity, after participation in inquiry-based laboratory courses. Then, we synthesize what we have learned about successes and limitations to promoting growth in positive attitudes toward science and science identity after participation in these courses. Our work focuses on non-science majors who are deaf, hard-of-hearing and hearing signers in bilingual (American Sign Language and written English) inquiry-based biology laboratory courses. We concentrate on the Deaf Community because deaf individuals often face challenges regarding access in STEM education. Our results indicate that participation in inquiry-based laboratory courses has the potential to positively influence students’ attitudes toward science via repeated engagement with hands-on, student-driven experimentation, peer collaboration, and a welcoming classroom environment. However, participation in these classes had a limited impact on students’ science identities. Some students saw themselves as scientists during laboratory classes, however, their science identities beyond the classroom remained unchanged. While inquiry-based laboratories successfully promote one aspect of affective learning, work is needed to improve students’ science identities and increase interest in STEM careers to more effectively recruit students in these courses.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Allen, J. M., Smith, J. L., Muragishi, G. A., Thoman, D. B., & Brown, E. R. (2015). To grab and to hold: cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in firstgeneration college students' science interest. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(4), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000046
Archer, L., Dewitt, J. & Osborne, J. (2015). Is science for us? Black students' and parents' views of science and science careers. Science Education, 99(2), 199-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21146
Beck C., Butler A., & Burke da Silva, K. (2014). Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: Are we meeting the grade? CBE - Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0245
Brown, E. R., Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., & Diekman, A. B. (2015). Closing the communal gap: the importance of communal affordances in science career motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(12), 662-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12327
Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 11871218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Clark, M. D. & Daggett, D. J. (2015). Exploring the presence of a Deaf American cultural life script. Deafness and Education International, 17(4), 194-203.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M. & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics career. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342
Diekman, A. B., Weigram, E. S. & Belanger, A. L. (2015). New routes to recruiting and retaining women in STEM: policy implications of a communal goal congruity perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 52-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12010
Feinstein, N.W., Allen S., & Jenkins, E. (2013). Outside the pipeline: reimagining science education for nonscientists. Science, 6130(340), 314-317. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230855
Finson, K. D. (2010). Drawing a scientist: what we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.19498594.2002.tb18217.x
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099
Gehring, K. M., & Eastman, D. A. (2008). Information fluency for undergraduate biology majors: Applications of inquiry-based learning in a developmental biology course. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 7(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-10-0091
Gibson H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Hallar B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2011). Lessons learned about implementing an inquiry-based curriculum in a college biology laboratory classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(3), 26-32.
Gormally C., Sullivan, C. S., & Szeinbaum, N. (2016). Uncovering barriers to teaching assistants (TAs) enacting inquiry teaching: inconsistent facilitation techniques, student resistance, and reluctance to share control over learning with students. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i2.1038
Gormally, C. & Marchut, A. (2017). “Science isn’t my thing:” Exploring non-science majors’ science identities. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 20(1), 1-15.
Gormally, C. (2017). Undergraduates’ Attitudes to Science in Bilingual (American Sign Language and English) Inquiry-based Biology Laboratory Classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-06-0194
Jeffery, E., Nomme, K., Deane, T., Pollock, C. & Birol, G. (2016). Investigating the role of an inquiry-based biology lab course on student attitudes and views toward science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0203
Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20411
Koballa T., and Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85(3), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.19498594.1985.tb09615.x
Losh, S. C. (2009). Stereotypes about scientists over time among U.S. adults: 1983 and 2001. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 372-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508098576
NSF, National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2015). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015. Special Report NSF (15-311). Arlington, VA. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from www.nsf.gov/statistics/women/
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Box 285, Washington, DC 20055
National Science Board (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. National Science Foundation (NSF 14-01), Arlington, VA.
National Student Clearinghouse (2015). Snapshot Report: degree attainment. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from https://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-degreeattainment15/
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
PCAST. (2012). President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report to the President: Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/adminstration/eop/ostp/pcast/docsreports
Partin, M. L., & Haney, J. J. (2012). The CLEM model: Path analysis of the mediating effects of attitudes and motivational beliefs on the relationship between perceived learning environment and course performance in an undergraduate non-major biology course. Learning Environments Research, 15(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9102-x
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development. (pp. 183-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schinske, J., Cardenas, M., & Kaliangara, J. (2015). Uncovering scientist stereotypes and their relationships with student race and student success in a diverse community college setting. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 14(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-12-0231
Semsar, K., Knight, J.K., Birol, G., & Smith, M.K. (2011). The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for Use in Biology. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-10-0133
Solomon, C., Braun, D., Kushalnagar, R., Ladner, R. E., Lundberg, D., Painter, R., & Nuzzo, R. (2013). Workshop for Emerging Deaf and Hard of Hearing Scientists: A White Paper. National Science Foundation.
Thoman, D. B., Brown, E. R., Mason, A. Z., Harmsen, A. G., & Smith, J. L. (2015). The role of altruistic values in motivating underrepresented minority students for bioscience. Bioscience, 65(2), 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu199
Varelas, M. (2012). Identity research as a tool for developing a feeling for the learner. In M. Varelas (Ed.), Identity construction and science education research. Boston, Massachusetts: Sense Publishers.
Walter, G. G. (2010). Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students in Transition: Demographics with an Emphasis on STEM Education. Report for Testing the Concept of a Virtual Alliance for Deaf and Hard of Hearing STEM Students at the Postsecondary Level (NSF HRD-0927586) and Planning Grant for the Center for Advancing Technological Education for the Deaf (NSF DUE-0903167).
Weaver, G. C., Russell, C. B., & Wink, D. J. (2008). Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. Nature Chemical Biology, 4(10), 577-580. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio1008-577