Embracing Vulnerability and Risk in the Classroom: The Four-Folder Approach to Discussion-Based Community Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recognition of various power systems within and surrounding their classrooms, US women’s studies instructors have for several decades worked to reconfigure the college classroom as an environment that enables all students to testify, thus creating empowered communities and ultimately inspiring the next generation of leaders. As some of the most repeated mantras of feminist pedagogy, these educational goals embody the liberating power of feminist theory and practice. The pedagogical practices employed in attaining these goals typically value experiential knowledge and encourage students to be attuned to various forms of speech and knowledge construction, which are framed through a politics of power and difference. As part of an ongoing conversation about the perils of cooperative learning, independent problem-solving, and peer leadership in higher education, this reflective essay describes one strategy, which I call the four-folder system. This instructional strategy troubles the promises of safety and implied instructor surveillance that so many feminist instructors adhere to, while simultaneously creating a multi-vocal learning environment. The techniques and rationale described may be applied to a range of courses and are not necessarily bound to introductory women’s studies surveys. I propose that given favorable conditions, embracing vulnerability and risk in the classroom better frees our students from the confines of conventional pedagogies used in higher education.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Amy, L.E. (2006). A pedagogy of witness: Encounter, crisis, and transformation in women's studies classes. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy, 17(1), 5769.
Applebaum, B. (2014). Hold that thought! A response to “Respect differences? Challenging the common guidelines in social justice education.” Democracy & Education, 22(2), 1-4.
Bunch, C. (1983). Not by degrees: Feminist theory and education. In Pollack, S., & Bunch, C. (Eds.), Learning Our Way: Essays in Feminist Education (248-260). Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
Brown, W. (1997). The impossibility of women's studies. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 9(3), 79-101.
Crabtree, R.D., Sapp, D.A., & Licona, A.C. (Eds). (2009). Feminist pedagogy: Looking back to move forward. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Culley, M. (1985). Anger and authority in the introductory women's studies classroom. In Culley, M., & Portuges, C. (Eds.), Gendered Subjects: The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching (209217). Boston: Routledge, 209-217.
Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-327. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250
Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge.
Fink, L.D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
Fisher, B.M. (2001). No angel in the classroom: Teaching through feminist discourse. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Freedman, E.B. (1990). Small group pedagogy: Consciousness raising in conservative times. NWSA Journal, 2(4), 603-623.
Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.
Hobson, J. (2007). The personal is global: Teaching global feminist consciousness. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy 17(2), 96-105.
Hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End.
Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.
Hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED343465
Johnson-Bailey, J. (2003). Everyday perspectives on feminism: African American women speak out. Race, Gender & Class 10(3), 82-99.
Johnson-Bailey, J., & Ming-Yeh Lee. (2005). Women of color in the academy: Where’s our authority in the classroom? Feminist Teacher, 15(2), 111-123.
Kishimoto, K., & Mwangi, M. (2009). Critiquing the rhetoric of “safety” in feminist pedagogy: Women of color offering an account of ourselves. Feminist Teacher, 19(2), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1353/ftr.0.0044
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
Ludlow, J. (2004). From safe space to contested space in the feminist classroom. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy, 15(1), 40-56.
Michaelsen, L. K. (1992). Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In Wulff, D., & Nyquist, J. D. (Eds), To Improve the Academy (107-122). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press and the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1248&context=podimproveacad
Millis, B.J. (2010). Active learning strategies in face-to-face courses. IDEA Paper #53. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://ideaedu.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/paperidea_53.pdf
Millis, B.J. (2002). Enhancing learning – and more! – through cooperative learning. IDEA Paper #38. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://ideaedu/org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/IDEA_Paper_38.pdf
Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ray, N.M. (2010). Transforming teaching and learning: Teaching race. In Sheared, V., JohnsonBailey, J., Colin, III, S.A.J., Peterson, E., & Brookfield, S.D. (Eds), The Handbook of Race and Adult Education: A Resource for Dialogue on Racism (71-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rich, A. (1979). Taking women students seriously. The Radical Teacher, 11, 40-43.
Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. (2014). Respect differences? Challenging the common guidelines in social justice education. Democracy and Education, 22(2), 1-10.
Shackelford, J. (1992). Feminist pedagogy: A means for bringing critical thinking and creativity to the economics classroom. Alternative Pedagogies and Economic Education, 82(2), 570-576.
Shrewsbury, C. (1987). What is feminist pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly, 15(3/4), 6-13.
Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., & Donovan, S.S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
Tisdell, E.J. (1995). Creating inclusive learning environments for adults: Insights from multicultural education and feminist pedagogy. Information Series No. 361. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED384827.pdf
Warren, L. (2000). Managing hot moments in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/html/icb.topic58474/hotmoments.html
Weber Cannon, L. (1990). Fostering positive race, class, and gender dynamics in the classroom. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 18(1/2), 126-134.
Winkler, B.S., & DiPalma, C. (Eds). (1999). Teaching introduction to women's studies: Expectations and strategies. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.