Embracing Vulnerability and Risk in the Classroom: The Four-Folder Approach to Discussion-Based Community Learning

Main Article Content

Elizabeth Whittenburg Ozment

Abstract

In recognition of various power systems within and surrounding their classrooms, US women’s studies instructors have for several decades worked to reconfigure the college classroom as an environment that enables all students to testify, thus creating empowered communities and ultimately inspiring the next generation of leaders. As some of the most repeated mantras of feminist pedagogy, these educational goals embody the liberating power of feminist theory and practice. The pedagogical practices employed in attaining these goals typically value experiential knowledge and encourage students to be attuned to various forms of speech and knowledge construction, which are framed through a politics of power and difference. As part of an ongoing conversation about the perils of cooperative learning, independent problem-solving, and peer leadership in higher education, this reflective essay describes one strategy, which I call the four-folder system. This instructional strategy troubles the promises of safety and implied instructor surveillance that so many feminist instructors adhere to, while simultaneously creating a multi-vocal learning environment. The techniques and rationale described may be applied to a range of courses and are not necessarily bound to introductory women’s studies surveys. I propose that given favorable conditions, embracing vulnerability and risk in the classroom better frees our students from the confines of conventional pedagogies used in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ozment, E. W. (2018). Embracing Vulnerability and Risk in the Classroom: The Four-Folder Approach to Discussion-Based Community Learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i2.22448
Section
Case Studies
Author Biography

Elizabeth Whittenburg Ozment, University of Virginia

Assistant Dean, College of Arts & Sciences

References

Amy, L.E. (2006). A pedagogy of witness: Encounter, crisis, and transformation in women's studies classes. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy, 17(1), 5769.

Applebaum, B. (2014). Hold that thought! A response to “Respect differences? Challenging the common guidelines in social justice education.” Democracy & Education, 22(2), 1-4.

Bunch, C. (1983). Not by degrees: Feminist theory and education. In Pollack, S., & Bunch, C. (Eds.), Learning Our Way: Essays in Feminist Education (248-260). Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.

Brown, W. (1997). The impossibility of women's studies. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 9(3), 79-101.

Crabtree, R.D., Sapp, D.A., & Licona, A.C. (Eds). (2009). Feminist pedagogy: Looking back to move forward. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Culley, M. (1985). Anger and authority in the introductory women's studies classroom. In Culley, M., & Portuges, C. (Eds.), Gendered Subjects: The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching (209217). Boston: Routledge, 209-217.

Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-327. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250

Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge.

Fink, L.D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Fisher, B.M. (2001). No angel in the classroom: Teaching through feminist discourse. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Freedman, E.B. (1990). Small group pedagogy: Consciousness raising in conservative times. NWSA Journal, 2(4), 603-623.

Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.

Hobson, J. (2007). The personal is global: Teaching global feminist consciousness. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy 17(2), 96-105.

Hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End.

Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.

Hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED343465

Johnson-Bailey, J. (2003). Everyday perspectives on feminism: African American women speak out. Race, Gender & Class 10(3), 82-99.

Johnson-Bailey, J., & Ming-Yeh Lee. (2005). Women of color in the academy: Where’s our authority in the classroom? Feminist Teacher, 15(2), 111-123.

Kishimoto, K., & Mwangi, M. (2009). Critiquing the rhetoric of “safety” in feminist pedagogy: Women of color offering an account of ourselves. Feminist Teacher, 19(2), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1353/ftr.0.0044

Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.

Ludlow, J. (2004). From safe space to contested space in the feminist classroom. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy, 15(1), 40-56.

Michaelsen, L. K. (1992). Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In Wulff, D., & Nyquist, J. D. (Eds), To Improve the Academy (107-122). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press and the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1248&context=podimproveacad

Millis, B.J. (2010). Active learning strategies in face-to-face courses. IDEA Paper #53. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://ideaedu.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/paperidea_53.pdf

Millis, B.J. (2002). Enhancing learning – and more! – through cooperative learning. IDEA Paper #38. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://ideaedu/org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/IDEA_Paper_38.pdf

Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ray, N.M. (2010). Transforming teaching and learning: Teaching race. In Sheared, V., JohnsonBailey, J., Colin, III, S.A.J., Peterson, E., & Brookfield, S.D. (Eds), The Handbook of Race and Adult Education: A Resource for Dialogue on Racism (71-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rich, A. (1979). Taking women students seriously. The Radical Teacher, 11, 40-43.

Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. (2014). Respect differences? Challenging the common guidelines in social justice education. Democracy and Education, 22(2), 1-10.

Shackelford, J. (1992). Feminist pedagogy: A means for bringing critical thinking and creativity to the economics classroom. Alternative Pedagogies and Economic Education, 82(2), 570-576.

Shrewsbury, C. (1987). What is feminist pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly, 15(3/4), 6-13.

Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., & Donovan, S.S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021

Tisdell, E.J. (1995). Creating inclusive learning environments for adults: Insights from multicultural education and feminist pedagogy. Information Series No. 361. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED384827.pdf

Warren, L. (2000). Managing hot moments in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/html/icb.topic58474/hotmoments.html

Weber Cannon, L. (1990). Fostering positive race, class, and gender dynamics in the classroom. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 18(1/2), 126-134.

Winkler, B.S., & DiPalma, C. (Eds). (1999). Teaching introduction to women's studies: Expectations and strategies. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.