Main Article Content
Engagement has been studied as a multidimensional construct consisting of three subtypes: behavioral, cognitive, and emotional (Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004). Among these, behavioral engagement has received the most and emotional engagement, the least attention (Fredricks et al., 2004). The current study thus aimed to examine the relationship between lecturer-student interaction, emotional engagement (specifically affective reactions expressed within the classroom), and academic outcomes (such as, student achievement and learning) in a sample of 140 undergraduate psychology students (M = 24, F = 116). Participants were randomly assigned to one of the experimental conditions (i.e., good vs. poor lecturer-student interaction) and completed the Lecturer-Student Interaction (LSI) questionnaire, Class-related Emotions Questionnaire (CEQ), Perception of Learning (POL) Questionnaire, and two measures of academic achievement. Individuals who shared a good interaction with their lecturer reported higher levels of emotional engagement compared to those who shared poor interactions with their lecturers. In addition, while emotional engagement failed to mediate the pathway between lecturer-student interaction and academic achievement, it was found to partially mediate lecturer-student interaction and student learning. The present findings highlight the significance of emotional engagement in enhancing learning outcomes in students.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Ainley, M. (2004, November). What do we know about student motivation and engagement? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.
Ainley, M., and Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4-12. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
Ang, R.P. (2005). Development and validation of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory: Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 55-73.
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Kim, D., and Reschly, A.L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Artino, A.R. (2009). Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success? Internet and Higher Education, 12, 117-125.
Barkatsas, A., Kasimatis, K., and Gialamas, V. (2009). Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Computers & Education, 52, 562-570. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.001
Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bates, S.C., and Cox, J. (2008). The impact of computer versus paper pencil survey, and individual versus group administration, on self reports of sensitive behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 903-916.
Birch, S.H., and Ladd, G.W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61-79.
Bush, R.N. (1942). A study of student-teacher relationships. The Journal of Educational Research, 35(9), 645-656.
Bressani, R.V., and Downs, A.C. (2002). Youth independent living assessment: Testing the equivalence of web and paper/pencil versions of the Ansell-Casey Life Skills Assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 453-464.
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(13). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/
Connell, J.P., Spencer, M.B., and Aber, J.L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in AfricanAmerican youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in School. Child Development, 65(2), 493506.
Finn, J.D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.
Finn, J.D., and Voelkl, K.E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249-268.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., and Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fraser, B.J., and Fisher, D.L. (1982). Predicting students' outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment. American Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 498-518.
Frenzel, A.C., Thrash, T.M., Pekrun, R., and Goetz, T. (2007). Achievement emotions in Germany and China: A cross-cultural validation of the Academic Emotions QuestionnaireMathematics (AEQ-M). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 302-309. doi: 10.1177/0022022107300276
Furlong, M.J., Whipple, A.D., Jean, G.S., Simental, J., Soliz, A., and Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. The California School Psychologist, 8, 99-113.
Furrer, C., and Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. doi: 10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.52
Handelsman, M.M., Briggs, W.L., Sullivan, N., and Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-191.
Hughes, J.N., and Kwok, O.M. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39-51. doi: 10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206
Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 798-811. doi: 10.1037/a0012841
Jang, H., Reeve, J., and Deci, E.L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600. doi: 10.1037/a0019682
Jimerson, S.J., Campos, E., and Grief, J.L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7-27.
Klem, A.M., and Connell, J.M. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74 (7), 262-273.
Ladd, G.W., Birch, S.H., and Buhs, E.S. (1999). Children's social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence? Child Development, 70 (6), 1373-1400.
Ladd, G.W., and Dinella, L.M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190-206. doi: 10.1037/a0013153
Lam, S.F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F.H., Nelson, B., … Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 77-94. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004
McInnis, C., Griffin, P., James, R., and Coates, H. (2001). Development of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip01_1/01_1.pdf
McLean, M. (2001). Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement? Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 399-413.
Metheny, J., McWcWhirter, E.H., and O’ Neil, M.E. (2008). Measuring perceived teacher support and its influence on adolescent career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 218-237.
Miller, R.B., Greene, B.A., Montalvo, G.P., Ravindran, B., and Nichols, J.D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388-422.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A.M., and Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83-98. doi: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A.C., Barchfeld, P., and Perry, R.P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36-48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., and Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ selfregulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
Preacher, K.J., and Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.
Raines, D.A. (2010). An innovation to facilitate student engagement and learning: Crossword puzzles in the classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 5, 85-90. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2008.08.003
Reddy, R., Rhodes, J.E., and Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 119-38. doi: 10.1017.S0954579403000075
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., and Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
Reeve, J., and Tseng, C.M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
Sinclair, M.F., Christenson, S.L., Lehr, C.A., and Anderson, A.R. (2003). Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from Check & Connect longitudinal studies. The California School Psychologist, 8, 29-41.
Skinner, E.A., and Belmont, M.J.(1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., and Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. doi: 10.1037/a0012840
Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., and Connell, J.P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22-32.
Tabachnick, B.G., and Fidell, L.S. (2007).Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Trickett, E.J., and Moos, R.H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 93-102.
Tucker, C. M., Zayco, R. A., Herman, K. C., Reinke, W. M., Trujillo, M., Carraway, K.,… Ivery, P. D. (2002). Teacher and child variable as predictorsof academic engagement among lowincome African American children. Psychology in the Schools, 39(4), 477-488. doi: 10.1002/pits.10038
Wharton, C.M., Hampl, J.S., Hall, R., and Winham, D.M. (2003). PCs or paper-and pencil: Online surveys for data collection. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103(11), 14581460. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.004
Wigfield, A., and Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Zyngier, D. (2008). (Re)conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1765-1776. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004