Main Article Content
This exercise is designed to help instructors, even those with moderate to relatively large enrollments, lead students through interviews and data analysis. Instructors in a number of fields including sociology, economics, political science, public policy, anthropology, business, or human services may find this exercise useful. Students devise their own research questions and interview questions from course readings on workplace and labor market inequality. They are responsible for conducting four short interviews; two with service-sector employees and two with managers or owners of similar establishments. Students are then responsible for assessing the extent to which the two sides converge and diverge. Along with a description of the exercise, I present a suggested format for students’ final papers, as well as sample research questions, interview questions, and sample establishment-types that students may use to create their own independent research project. My students are often surprised by the richness of their data and the consistency of their conclusions with existing theory and empirical research findings.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Abelev, M., Vincent, M.B., and Haney, T.J. (2008). The bottom line: An exercise to help students understand how inequality is actively constructed. Teaching Sociology, 36 (2), 150-160.
American Sociological Association. (1999). Code of Ethics. http://www.asanet.org/galleries/default-file/Code%20of%20Ethics.pdf (accessed 26 July 2009).
Appalshop Productions. (1990). Fast Food Women. (video).
Babbie, Earl. (2008). The basics of social research. Belmont, CA: Thompson Education Group.
Certo, S.C. (1976). The experiential exercise situation: A comment on instructional role and pedagogy evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 1(3), 113-16.
Dunn, R. (1984). Learning style: State of the science. Theory into Practice, 23 (1), 10-19.
Ehrenreich, B. (2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York: Henry Holt.
Friedman, P. and Alley, R. (1984). Learning/Teaching styles: Applying the principles. Theory into Practice, 23 (1), 77-81.
Giles, D.E. and Eyler, J. (1994). The theoretical roots of service-learning in John Dewey: toward a theory of service learning.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1, 77-85.
Grant, L., Heirich, M, Martin, SM, and Van Eck, E. (1981). The Detroit tours: Experiential learning within the framework of a large lecture course. Teaching Sociology, 9, 15-29.
Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children: Women in the age of welfare reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
McCammon, L. (1999). Introducing social stratification and inequality: An active learning technique. Teaching Sociology, 27, 44-54.
Mikolchak, M. (2006). Service Learning in English Composition: A Case Study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6 (2), 93-100.
Misra, J. (1997). Teaching stratification: Stimulating interest and critical thinking through research projects. Teaching Sociology, 25, 278-91.
Mooney, L.A. and Edwards, B. (2001). Experiential learning in sociology: Service-learning and other community-based learning initiatives. Teaching Sociology, 29, 181-94.
Newman, K.S. (2006). Chutes and ladders: Navigating the low-wage labor market. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Newman, K.S. (1999). No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city. New York: Russell Sage.
Nichols, L., Berry, J., and Kalogrides, D. (2004). Hop on the bus: Driving stratification concepts home. Teaching Sociology, 32, 213-31.
Public Broadcasting Service. (2006). Waging a living. (video)
Reskin, B.F. and Roos, P.A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Scarce, R. (1997). Field trips as short-term experiential education. Teaching Sociology, 25, 219-26.
Shipler, D.K. (2005). The working poor: invisible in America. New York: Vintage.
Straus, R.A. (1986). Simple games for teaching sociological perspectives: Four examples of the do-it-yourself approach. Teaching Sociology, 14, 119-28.
Waldinger, R. and Lichter, M.I. (2003). How the other half works: Immigration and the social organization of labor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wright, M.C. (2000). Getting more out of less: The benefits of short-term experiential learning in undergraduate sociology courses. Teaching Sociology, 28 (2), 116-26.