Growing Lemon Trees from Lemons: Lessons Reaped from a SoTL Faculty Learning Community's Research "Failures"
Main Article Content
Abstract
Failure can be central to faculty research; however, failure produces a vehicle for learning. Through an interdisciplinary faculty community, the authors supported each other in facing, learning from, and overcoming “failed” aspects of research projects. This article reports obstacles encountered in conducting Scholarship of Teaching and Learning research and the role of a faculty learning community in overcoming these challenges. Research pitfalls included lack of student participants, non-significant findings, expectations for understanding related course content, technology issues, use of deception, determining the research question, and managing bias. Ultimately, the faculty learning community engendered a foundation for successful research projects by shared inquiry into these research “failures.”
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Amick, A. W., & Cross, N. (2014). An almost paperless organic chemistry course with the use of iPads. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(5), 753-756.
Bradbury, H. & Reason, P. (2003). Action research: An opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 155-175.
Carr, D. (2014). The human and educational significance of honesty as an epistemic and moral virtue. Educational Theory, 64(1), 1-14.
Conover, T. E. (2015a). The Police Engaging the Business Community: Using Survey Research to Examine Needs. In SAGE Research Methods Cases. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications, Ltd. doi: 10.4135/978144627305014558052
Conover, T. E. (2015b). Integrating Community-based Research into a Criminal Justice Capstone Course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(4) 408-422. doi: 10.1080/10511253.2015.1049631
Conway, J., Amel, E., & Gerwein, D. (2009). Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service-learning’s effects on academic, personal, social and citizenship outcomes. Teaching Psychology, 36(4), 233-245.
Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2011). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection to chemistry, and implications for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 351-360.
Hesser, J. L., & Schwartz, P. M. (2013). iPads in the science laboratory: Experience in designing and implementing a paperless chemistry laboratory course. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 5-9.
Hofstein, J. D., Tucker, L., Swarner, K., Moriarty, D., Tegas, L., DeMarte, N., & Adiletta, N. (2013). Using iPads in the chemistry classroom: Focusing on paperless education and identification and directed use of pedagogically directed applications. The Chemical Educator, 18, 248-254.
Howard, G. S. (1980). Response-shift bias a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Evaluation Review, 4(1), 93-106.
Hurtado, S. (2009). Assessing higher education’s advancement toward a new vision of society. Diversity & Democracy, 12(1), 1-3.
Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening Lines: Approaches to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Students’ note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor’s notes for review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 378–386. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(85)90034-7
Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240–245. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.240
Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S. M., & Titsworth, B. S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64, 344-365. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1038727
Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, B. S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62, 233-252. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.767917 Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
Lount, R. J., Zhong, C., Sivanathan, N., & Murnighan, J. K. (2008). Getting off on the wrong foot: The timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1601-1612.
Marshall, J. L. & Comminos, W. (2013). Incorporating aspects of the Ohio REEL Program into the organic chemistry laboratory: The SN1 reaction of bromotriphenylmethane.” AURCO Journal, 19, 157-167.
Marshall, J. L. & Hodge, C. J. (2016). Discovery-based experiments in the organic chemistry lab: The SN2 conversion of phenylalanine to phenyllactic acid.” AURCO Journal, 22, 157-165.
McCollum, B. M., Regier, L., Leong, J., Simpson, S., & Sterner, S. (2014). The effects of using touch-screen devices on students’ molecular visualization and representational competence skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1810-1817.
McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 58(2), 361-382.
McMahon-Klosterman, K. (2015). Envisioning and implementing campus-wide programs and curricular in service-learning: The role of faculty learning communities. Learning Communities Journal, 7, 89-115.
Moran, Charles. (2003). Computers and Composition 1983-2002: What we have hoped for. Computers and Composition, 20, 343-358.
Paul, E. L. (2006). Community-based research as scientific and civic pedagogy. Peer Review, 8(1), 12-15.
Porter, J. (2002). Why technology matters to writing: A cyberwriter’s tale. Computers and Composition, 20, 375-394.
Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 136–143.
Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding School Improvement with Action Research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Southwick, S. M. & Charney, D. S. (2012). Resilience: The science of mastering life’s greatest challenges. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stieff, M., Ryu, M., Dixon, B., & Hegarty, M. (2012). The role of spatial ability and strategy preference for spatial problem solving in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 854-859.
Tawfik, A., & Jonassen, D. (2013). The effects of successful versus failure-based cases on argumentation while solving decision-making problems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 385-406. doi: 10.1007/s11423-013-9294-5.
Titsworth, B. S., & Kiewra, K. A. (2004). Spoken organizational lecture cues and student notetaking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 447–461. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.12.001
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (1979). The Belmont report. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html#xinform
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Secretary’s advisory committee on human research protections minutes. Retrieved from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp/mtgings/mtg03-11/march2011minutes.pdf
Yeo, R. K. (2009). Liberating murphy’s law: Learning from change. Industrial and Commercial Training, (41)2. 67-74. doi: 10.1108/00197850910939090.
Zuniga, X., Williams, E., & Berger, J. (2005). Action-oriented democratic outcomes: The impact of student involvement with campus diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 660-678.