Implementing Collaborative Learning across the Engineering Curriculum

Main Article Content

Patricia Stark Ralston
Thomas R Tretter
Marie Kendall Brown


Active and collaborative teaching methods increase student learning, and it is broadly accepted that almost any active or collaborative approach will improve learning outcomes as compared to lecture. Yet, large numbers of faculty have not embraced these methods. Thus, the challenge to encourage evidence-based change in teaching is not only how to educate faculty about collaborative learning techniques, but how to support them as they attempt to implement paradigmatic changes in how they deliver their courses. This paper presents a multiple case study detailing the approach one mid-sized Midwestern research university’s school of engineering used to encourage faculty in all departments to embrace the use of collaborative learning techniques, and then analyzes the impact of the approach on faculty participants. Support structures to enable faculty to implement collaborative teaching techniques, as well as the benefits participants experienced from pedagogical shifts, are discussed.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ralston, P. S., Tretter, T. R., & Kendall Brown, M. (2017). Implementing Collaborative Learning across the Engineering Curriculum. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(3), 89–108.
Case Studies


Abdulwahed, M., Balid, W., Hasna, M. O., & Pokharel, S. (2013). Skills of engineers in knowledge based economies: A comprehensive literature review, and model development. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 759-765.

ABET (2014). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Retrieved from

Barkley, E. F, Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 220-252.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 5-23.

Cox, M. D. (2003). Fostering the scholarship of teaching through faculty learning communities. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 14, 161-198.

Cox, M. D. (2001). Faculty learning communities: Change agents for transforming institutions into learning organizations. To Improve the Academy, 19, 69-93.

Fairweather, J. (2010). Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Undergraduate Education: A Status Report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education (BOSE) (BOSE, Washington, DC, 2010). Retrieved from

Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Ethnography: Step by step, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 3, 020102, 1-14.

Jaschik, S. (2015, January 20). Well-prepared in their own eyes. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from

Kezar, A. (2011). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved practices in higher education? Innovations of Higher Education. 36, 235-247.

Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Elrod, S. (2015). Implicit theories of change as a barrier to change on college campuses: An examination of STEM reform. The Review of Higher Education, 38(4), 479-506.

Lee, K. S., & Chavis, D. M. (2012). Cross-case methodology: Bringing rigor to community and systems change research and evaluation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 428-438.

Michael, J. (2007). Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning. College Teaching, 55(2), 42-47.

Passow, H. J. (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95–118.

Sunal, D. W., Hodges, J., Sunal, C. S., Whitaker, K. W., Freeman, L. M., Edwards, L., Johnston, R. A., & Odell, M. (2001). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics 101(5), 246–257.

Walczyk, J. J., Ramsey, L. L., & Zha, P. (2007). Obstacles to instructional innovation according to college science and mathematics faculty. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 44(1), 85–106.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Yin, R. K. (Ed.) (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.