Main Article Content
Background and Purpose. Grand Rounds is a teaching methodology that has existed in various forms in medical education for centuries. When a student-run pro bono clinic identified a growing challenge of providing continuity of care for clients and a lack of preparedness in students, they implemented a Grand Rounds model of case presentation within the curriculum. The purpose of this paper is to describe the implementation and assessment of Grand Rounds as it attempts to improve both the continuity of care for the clients and the learning experience for the students involved in a student-run pro bono clinic.
Case Description and Evaluation. The Student Board divided the student physical therapists and the clients into three teams. Each team of students would meet every three weeks to discuss the clients on their caseload. More advanced students helped to mentor the more novice students and a faculty member would facilitate the discussions.
Outcomes. After eight months of implementation, the Student Board gathered evaluative data from students, supervisors and client. The program evaluation was approved by the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Analysis of the data collected revealed that the students grew more confident and effective in their ability to implement and advance the physical therapy program.Discussion and Conclusion. The program evaluation confirmed that the implementation of teams and Grand Rounds positively impacted students' confidence and ability to collaboratively treat and advance clients and their physical therapy program in the student-run pro bono clinic. The program evaluation was not effective in thoroughly assessing the impact that the model had on clients and their recovery. Further evaluation should be conducted with client outcomes measures. Recommendations for the modification and improvement of Grand Rounds emerged.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Backes, C.H., Reber, K.M., Trittmann, J.K.B., Huang, H., Tobmlin, J., Moorehead, P.A., Bauer, J.A., Smith, C.V., Mahan, J.D. (2011). Fellows as teachers: a model to enhance pediatric resident education. Medical Education Online, 16: 7205 doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.7205.
Doumouras, A., Rush, R., Campbell, A., Taylor, D. (2015. Peer-assisted bedside teaching rounds. Clinical Teacher [serial online],12(3):197-202. Available from: Education Research Complete, Ipswich, MA. Retrieved October 18, 2015.
Goetz, C.G., Bonduell, M., Gelfand, T. (1995). Charcot: Constructing Neurology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hebert, R.S., Wright, S.M.(2003). Re-examining the value of medical grand rounds. Academic Medicine,78(12):1248-52.
Hull, A.L., Cullen, R.J., Hekelman, F.P. (1989). A retrospective analysis of grand rounds in continuing medical education. Journal of Continuing Education Health Professional,9(4):25766.
Laskaratos, F.M., Wallace, D., Gkotsi, D., Burns, A., Epstein, O. (2015). The educational value of ward rounds for junior trainees. Medical Education Online, 20: 27559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.27559.
Medicine Net. (2015). Definition of Grand Rounds. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=40370.
Merriam Webster Dictionary. (2015). Definition of Grand Rounds. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/grand%20rounds.
Parissopoulos, S., Timmins, F., Daly, L. (2013). Re-exploring the ritual of the ward round. British Association of Critical Care Nurses, 18(5):219-221.
Richards, J., Schwartzstein, R., Irish, J., Almeida, J., Roberts, D. (2013). Clinical physiology grand rounds. The Clinical Teacher [serial online]. 10(2):88-93. Available from: MEDLINE, Ipswich, MA. Accessed October 18, 2015.
Rigby, H., Schofield, S., Mann, K., Bernstead, T. (2012). Education Research: An exploration of case-based learning in neuroscience grand rounds using the Delphi technique. Neurology, 79:e19-e26.
Stanyon, M., Khan, S.A. (2015).Requiem for the grand round. Clinical Medicine,15(1): 10-11.
Van Hoof, T.J., Monson, R.J., Mafdalany, G.T., Giannotti, T.E., Meehan, T.P. (2009). A case study of medical grand rounds: are we using effective methods? Academic Medicine. 84(8):1144-1151.
Chester Community Physical Therapy Clinic Mission Statement. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from www.chestercommunitypt.com.