Who says: “No Fair!”? What Personality and an Experiment in Educational Value Tell Us about Perceptions of Costs and Benefits of Research Pool Requirements
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
References
Allport, G. W. (1961). Patterns and growth in personality. New York, NY: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.
American Psychological Association. (2002). American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
Aviv, A. L., Zelenski, J. M., Rallo, L., & Larsen, R. J. (2002). Whocomeswhen: Personality differences in early and later participation in a university subject pool. Personality & Individual Differences, 33, 487-496.
Brody, J. L., Gluck, J. P., & Aragon, A. S. (2000). Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: Debriefing. Ethics & Behavior, 10(1), 13-25. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1001_2.
Cooper, H., Baumgardner, A. H., & Strathman, A. (1991). Do students with different characteristics take part in psychology experiments at different times of the semester? Journal of Personality, 59, 109–127.
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Darling, J., Goedert, K., Ceynar, M., Shore, W., & Anderson, D. (2007). Learning about the means to the end: What US introductory psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 6(2), 91-97. doi: 10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.91
Dollinger, S. J., & Leong, F. T. L. (1993). Volunteer bias and the five-factor model. Journal of Psychology, 127, 29-36.
Elicker, J. D., McConnell, N. L., & Hall, R. J. (2010). Research participation for course credit in introduction to psychology: Why don't people participate? Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 183185. doi: 10.1080/00986283.2010.488521
Elliott, L. J., Rice, S., Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Hipshur, M. F. (2010). Research participation versus classroom lecture: A comparison of student learning. Teaching of Psychology, 37(2), 129-131. doi: 10.1080/00986281003626862
Fischer, E. H., & Winer, D. (1969). Participation in psychological research: Relation to birth order and demographic factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(5), 610-613. doi: 10.1037/h0028112
Foot, H., & Sanford, A. (2004). The use and abuse of student participants. The Psychologist, 17(5), 256-259.
Friedman, H. S., & Booth-Kewley, S. (1988). Validity of the Type A construct: A reprise. Psychological Bulletin, 104(3), 381-384. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.3.381
Ganster, D. C., Schaubroeck, J., Sime, W. E., & Mayes, B. T. (1991). The nomological validity of the Type A personality among employed adults. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 143168. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.143
Howard, G. S., Lau, M. Y., Maxwell, S. E., Venter, A., Lundy, R., & Sweeny, R. M. (2009). Do research literatures give correct answer? Review of General Psychology, 13, 116-121.
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, O. P. John, L. A. Pervin, O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 102-138). New York, NY US: Guilford Press.
Kulich, R. J., Seldon, J. W., Richardson, K., & Servies, S. (1978). Frequency of employing undergraduate samples in psychological researchand subject reaction to forced participation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Psychological Association, Chicago.
Landrum, R. E., & Chastain, G. D. (1999). Subject pool policies in undergraduate-only departments: Results from a nationwide survey. In G. D. Chastain & R. E. Landrum (Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards. (pp. 2542). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.
Leak, G. K. (1981). Student perception of coercion and value from participation in psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 8(3), 147-149. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top0803_4
Martin, R. M., & Marcuse, F. L. (1958). Characteristics of volunteers and nonvolunteers in psychological experimentation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22(6), 475-479. doi: 10.1037/h0041496
Miller, A. (1981). A survey of introductory psychology subject pool practices among leading universities. Teaching of Psychology, 8(4), 211-213. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top0804_4
Miller, W. E., & Kreiner, D. S. (2008). Student perception of coercion to participate in psychological research. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 53-64.
Miller, W. E., Kreiner, D. S., Ryan, J. J., & Smith, J. W. (2010). Personality types and perceived coercion in psychological research participation. Individual Differences Research, 8(3), 140-150.
Richardson, D. R., Pegalis, L., & Britton, B. (1992). A technique for enhancing the value of research participation. Contemporary Social Psychology, 16 (1/2), 11-13.
Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Stein, M. I., & Eisenberg, R. F. (1995). Individual differences in experiment participation: Structure, autonomy, and the time of the semester. Journal of Personality, 63, 113–138.
Rosell, M. C., Beck, D. M., Luther, K. E., Goedert, K. M., Shore, W. J., & Anderson, D. D. (2005). The pedagogical value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 95-99. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3202_3
Rosen, E. (1951). Differences between volunteers and non-volunteers for psychological studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(3), 185-193. doi: 10.1037/h0061411
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York: Wiley.
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1976). The volunteer subject revisited. Australian Journal of Psychology, 28(2), 97-108. doi: 10.1080/00049537608255268
Scott-Jones, D. (2000). Recruitment of research participants. In B. D. Sales & S. Folkman (Eds.), Ethics in research with human participants. (pp. 27-34). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.
Sieber, J. E., & Saks, M. J. (1989). A census of subject pool characteristics and policies. American Psychologist, 44(7), 1053-1061. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.44.7.1053
Smith, D. ( 2003). Five principles for research ethics. Monitor on Psychology, 34. Retrieved from http://apa.org/monitor/jan03/principles.aspx
Thieman, T. J., Clary, E. G., Olson, A. M., Dauner, R. C., & Ring, E. E. (2009). Introducing students to psychological research: General psychology as a laboratory course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 160-168. doi: 10.1080/00986280902959994
Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Gwizdowski, l. (2006). Introductory Psychology Students' Perceptions of Alternatives to Research Participation. Teaching of Psychology, 33(4), 247-249. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3304_7
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979, April). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the pro- tection of human subjects of research. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm
Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Orlando, M. J. (2011). Timing and selection effects within a psychology subject pool: Personality and sex matter. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 355-359. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.019