Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
ACT (2012). The Condition of College and Career Readiness National Report. Found online at http://www.act.org/newsroom/data/2012/pdf/CCCR12-NationalReadinessRpt.pdf.
Adams, W.C., D.L. Infeld & C.M. Wulff (2013). Statistical software for curriculum and careers. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 19(1), 173-188.
American Heritage College Dictionary (2002). 4th Ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: Boston, MA.
Al-Atabi, M. (2014). Think like an engineer: Use systematic thinking to solve everyday challenges & unlock the inherent values in them. Creative Commons. As cited by Mushtak AlAtabi in a blog post titled “Return on Failure: Why I encourage my students to fail (and reward them for that)” on September 26, 2014 found online at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140926152625-39413468-return-on-failure-why-i-encouragemy-students-to-fail.
Bushway, S.D. & S.M. Flower (2002). Helping criminal justice students learn statistics: A quasiexperimental evaluation of learning assistance. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 13(1), 35-56.
Capshew, T.F. (2005). Motivating social work students in statistics courses. Social Work Education. 24(8), 857-868.
Chermak, S. & A. Weiss (1999). Activity-based learning of statistics: Using practical applications to improve students' learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 10(2), 361372.
Connors, F.A., S.M. Mccown & B. Roskos-Ewoldsen (1998). Unique challenges in teaching undergraduate statistics. Teaching of Psychology. 25(1), 40-42.
Cull, W.L. (2000). Untangling the Benefits of Multiple Study Opportunities and Repeated Testing for Cued Recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 14, 215-235.
Curran, E., K. Carlson & D.T. Celotta (2013). Changing attitudes and facilitating understanding in the undergraduate statistics classroom: A collaborative learning approach. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 13(2), 49-71.
Delucchi, M. (2007). Assessing the impact of group projects on examination performance in social statistics. Teaching in Higher Education. 12(4), 447-460.
Dunn, P.K., A. Richardson, C. McDonald & F. Oprescu (2012). Instructor perceptions of using mobile-phone-based free classroom response system in first-year statistics undergraduate courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology. 43(8), 1041-1056.
Elliott, W., E. Choi & T. Friedline (2013). Online statistics labs in MSW research methods courses: Reducing reluctance toward statistics. Journal of Social Work Education. 49(1), 81-95.
Forte, J.A. (1995). Teaching statistics without sadistics. Journal of Social Work Education. 31(2), 204-218.
Frantzen, D. (2014). Is technology a one-size-fits-all solution to improving student performance? A comparison of online, hybrid, and face-to-face courses. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 20(4), 565-578.
Grossman, D. (2014). Secret Google lab 'rewards staff for failure. BBC News (January 24, 2014). Found online at http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-25880738.
Gunyou, J. (2015). I flipped my classroom: One teacher’s quest to remain relevant. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 21(1), 13-24.
Hindlis, R. & S. Hronova (2015). Are we able to pass the mission of statistics to students? Teaching Statistics. 37(2), 61-65.
Karpicke, J.D. & H.L. Roediger (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language. 57, 151-162.
Karpicke, J.D. & H.L. Roediger (2008). The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning. Science. 319, 966-968.
Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice. 1(1), 5865.
Leong, K.C. (2013). “Google Reveals its 9 Principles of Innovation.” (November 20, 2013). Available online at https://www.fastcompany.com/3021956/how-to-be-a-success-ateverything/googles-nine-principles-of-innovation.
McDaniel, M.A., P.K. Agarwal, B.J. Huelser, K.B. McDermott & H.L. Roediger (2011). TestEnhanced Learning in a Middle School Science Classroom: The Effects of Quiz Frequency and Placement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 103, 399-414.
Pan, W & M. Tang (2005). Students' perceptions on factors of statistics anxiety and instructional strategies. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 32(3), 205-214.
Proctor, J.L. (2002). SPSS vs. Excel: Computing software, criminal justice students and statistics. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 13(2), 433-442.
Proctor, J.L. (2006). Academic achievement and statistical knowledge: A comparison of criminal justice and noncriminal justice majors. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 17(1), 143-161.
Rawson, K.A. & J. Dunlosky (2012). When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning? Educational Psychology Review. 24, 419435.
Roediger, H.L. & J.D. Karpicke (2006a). Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention. Psychological Science. 17(3), 249-255.
Roediger, H.L. & J.D. Karpicke (2006b). The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 1(3), 181-210.
Rowling, J.K. (2008). Commencement Speech to the Harvard Class of 2008. Published by the Harvard Gazette on June 5, 2008 and found online at http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2008/06/text-of-j-k-rowling-speech/
Shellenbarger, S. (2011). “Better ideas through failure: Companies reward employee mistakes to spur innovation, get back their edge”. The Wall Street Journal, September 27, 2011. Found online at http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204010604576594671572584158
Sparzo, F.J., C.M. Bennett & R.A. Rohm (1986). College student performance under repeated testing and cumulative testing conditions: Report on five studies. The Journal of Educational Research. 80(2), 99-104.
Stickels, J.W. & R.R. Dobbs (2007). Helping Alleviate Statistical Anxiety with Computer Aided Statistical Classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 7(1), 1-15.
Summers, J.J., A. Waigandt & T.A. Whittaker (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education. 29(3), 233-250.