Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Becker, E., Cotton, M. L. and Grizzle, G. (2003). The derived demand for faculty research. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(8), 549-567.
Brooks, R. L. (2005). Measuring university quality. The Review of Higher Education, 29(1), 121.
Caffarella, R. S. and Zinn, L. F. (1999). Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative Higher Education, 23(4), 241-255.
Centra, J. A. (1983). Reaserch productivity and teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 18(4), 379-389. doi: 10.1007/BF00974804
Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). The unforgiving complexity of teaching, avoiding simplicity in the age of accountability. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 3-5.
Colbeck, C. L. (2002). Integration: Evaluating Faculty Work as a Whole. Evaluating Faculty Performance: New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 43-52.
Earl, H. (2008). Looking the other way? Accreditation standards and part time faculty. Academe, 94(2), 103-110.
Elen, J., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. and Clement, M. (2007). Faculty Development in ResearchIntensive Universities: The role of academics’ conceptions on the relationship between research and teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 123-139.
Findlow, S. (2008). Accountability and innovation in higher education: a disabling tension? Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 313-329.
Foote, K. E. and Solem, M. N. (2009). Toward better mentoring for early career faculty: results of a study of US geographers. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(1), 47-58.
Gaye, L. and Cullen, D. L. (1995). Empowering the faculty: Mentoring redirected and renewed [ERIC Digest]. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Retrieved April 3 2010, from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=CklqX4zgDtgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=fac#v=onepage&q&f=false
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 748-750.
Halse, C., Deane, E., Hobson, J. and Jones, G. (2007). The research–teaching nexus: what do national teaching awards tell us? Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 727-746.
Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content Analysis. In L. Gardner & A. Elliot (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 596-692). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Huber, M. T. (2002). Faculty Evaluation and the Development of Academic Careers Evaluating Faculty Performance: New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 73-83.
Krahenbuhl, G. S. (1998). Faculty work. Change, 30(6), 18-25.
Landrum, R. E. and Clump, M. A. (2004). Departmental Search Committees and the Evaluation of Faculty Applicants. Teaching of Psychology, 31(1), 12-17. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3101_4
Lord, T. (2009). "But, I Thought We Were Colleagues?" Professors Evaluating Professors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(3), 62-66.
Meizlish, D. and Kaplan, M. (2008). Valuing and evaluating teaching in academic hiring: A multidisciplinary, cross-institutional study. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 489-512.
O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57-80.
Sabar-Ben-Yehoshua, N. (1990). Qualitative Research. Tel Aviv: Massada.
Secret, M., Leisey, M., Lanning, S., Polich, S. and Schaub, J. (2011). Faculty perceptions of the scholarship of teaching and learning: Definition, activity level and merit considerations at one university. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 1-20.
Serow, R. C. (2000). Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education, 40(4), 449-463. doi: 10.1023/A:1004154512833
Shagrir, L. (2010). Professional development of novice teacher educators: professional self, interpersonal relations and teaching skills. Professional Development in Education, 36(1-2), 4560. doi: DOI: 10.1080/19415250903454809
Shulman, L. S. (1998). Teaching and Teacher Education among the Professions. Paper presented at the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE), New Orleans, Louisiana.
Smeby, J. C. (1998). Knowledge production and knowledge transmission. The interaction between research and teaching at universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 5-20. doi: 10.1080/1356215980030101
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved June 21, 2011, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
Terpstra, D. E. and Honoree, A. L. (2009). The effects of different teaching, research, and service emphases on individual and organizational outcomes in higher education institutions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 169-176.
Wenger, E. C. and Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 139-145.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Zanting, A., Verloop, N. and Vermunt, N. J. D. (2003). Using Interviews and Concept Maps to Access Mentor Teachers' Practical Knowledge. Higher Education, 46, 195-214.