Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education, 58(2), 835– 842. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.008
Al-Azawei, A., & Badii, A. (2014). State of The Art of Learning Styles-Based Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Systems (LS-BAEHSs). International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 6(3), 1–19. doi:10.5121/ijcsit.2014.6301
Al-Azawei, A., Al-bermani, A., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Evaluating the Effect of Arabic Engineering Students’ Learning Styles in Blended Programming Courses. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 109–130.
Al-Azawei, A., & Lundqvist, K. (2015). Learner Differences in Perceived Satisfaction of an Online Learning: an Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model in an Arabic Sample. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(5), 408–426.
Burgstahler, S. (2011). Universal Design: Implications for Computing Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(3), 1–17. doi:10.1145/2037276.2037283
CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefeild, MA: Author.
CAST. (2015). CAST. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/our-work/aboutudl.html#.VW1yKyFViko.
Center for Universal Design. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm.
Chekfoung, T., Lily, S., & Kecheng, L. (2015). BIG DATA ARCHITECTURE FOR PERVASIVE HEALTHCARE : A LITERATURE REVIEW. Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany, 2015, 1–19.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post16 learning: A systematic and critical review.
Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2012). Improved Lesson Planning with Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. doi:10.1177/0888406412446178
Coyne, P., Pisha, B., Dalton, B., Zeph, L. a., & Smith, N. C. (2012). Literacy by Design: A Universal Design for Learning Approach for Students with Significant Intellectual Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 162–172. doi:10.1177/0741932510381651
Davies, P. L., Schelly, C. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2012). Measuring the Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning Intervention in Postsecondary Education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 195–220.
Felder, R. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18–23.
Graf, S. (2007). Adaptivity in learning management systems focussing on learning styles. PhD Dissertation, (December 2007).
Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing Learning Disabilities with UDL and Technology: Strategic Reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72–83. doi:10.1177/0731948714544375
He, Y. (2014). Universal Design for Learning in an Online Teacher Education Course : Enhancing Learners’ Confidence to Teach Online. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 283–298.
John Clarkson, P., & Coleman, R. (2015). History of Inclusive Design in the UK. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 235–247. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002
Kennedy, M. J., Thomas, C. N., Meyer, J. P., Alves, K. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2014). Using EvidenceBased Multimedia to Improve Vocabulary Performance of Adolescents with LD: A UDL Approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 71–86. doi:10.1177/0731948713507262
King-Sears, M. E., Johnson, T. M., Berkeley, S., Weiss, M. P., Peters-Burton, E. E., Evmenova, a. S., & Hursh, J. C. (2015). An Exploratory Study of Universal Design for Teaching Chemistry to Students with and Without Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 84–96. doi:10.1177/0731948714564575
Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by Design: Applying UDL Principles in a First Year Undergraduate Course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125–147.
Liakou, M., & Manousou, E. (2015). Distance education for people with visual impairments. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 73–85.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs : A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 203–227.
Mangiatordi, A., & Serenelli, F. (2013). Universal design for learning: A meta-analytic review of 80 abstracts from peer reviewed journals. Research on Education and Media, 5(1), 109–118.
Mavrou, K., & Symeonidou, S. (2014). Employing the principles of universal design for learning to deconstruct the Greek-Cypriot new national curriculum. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(9), 918–933. doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.859308
Mayer, R. E. (2011). Does styles research have useful implications for educational practice? Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 319–320. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.016
McGhie-Richmond, D., & Sung, A. N. (2012). Applying Universal Design for Learning to Instructional Lesson Planning. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 9(1), 43–59.
Özyurt, Ö., & Özyurt, H. (2015). Learning style based individualized adaptive e-learning environments: Content analysis of the articles published from 2005 to 2014. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 349–358. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.020
Pashler, H., Mcdaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning Styles Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. doi:10.1177/0741932513518980
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. (V. A. Alexandria, Ed.).
Rose, D., Harbour, W., Johnston, C. S., Daley, S., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal Design for Learning in Postsecondary Education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability (Vol. 19).
Smith, F. G. (2012). Analyzing a College Course That Adheres to the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Framework. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 31–61.
Smith, S. J., & Harvey, E. E. (2014). K-12 online lesson alignment to the principles of Universal Design for Learning: the Khan Academy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and ELearning, 29(3), 222–242. doi:10.1080/02680513.2014.992402
Truong, H. M. (2015). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014
Vanderheyden, K., & De Baets, S. (2015). Does cognitive style diversity affect performance in dyadic student teams? Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.006
Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The Scientific Status of Learning Styles Theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266–271. doi:10.1177/0098628315589505