Assessing Accessibility: Are Online Courses Better Than Face-to-Face Instruction At Providing Access to Course Content for Students with Disabilities?

Main Article Content

Lindsey R. Massengale
Eleazar Vasquez

Abstract

Delivering course material in a manner that is accessible to all students including those with disabilities is important in the online environment. This article presents an analysis focusing on the accessibility of six courses presented through the Webcourses platform. Six professors volunteered one course for analysis. The tool use for analyzing the courses was the WAVE tool bar. Analysis of course was completed individually, but results were reported across courses. Overall results indicated 13 types of challenges and of these 5 were the most prevalent across courses. The author discusses a brief history of distance education, the tool used for analysis, challenges that were identified within course and offers suggestion of how to minimize those challenges. Within the methodology, screen shots of the WAVE tool bar are provided. Visual analysis of the frequency of the 13 challenges is provided. Implications of the WAVE tool are shared with future research directions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Massengale, L. R., & Vasquez, E. (2016). Assessing Accessibility: Are Online Courses Better Than Face-to-Face Instruction At Providing Access to Course Content for Students with Disabilities?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i1.19101
Section
Case Studies

References

Allen, I., E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved August 8, 2014, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf.

Burdette, P. J., Greer, D. L., & Woods, K. L. (2013). K-12 online learning and students with disabilities: Perspectives from state special education directors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(3), 65–72.

Bushweller, K. (2014). Digital advances, common core fuel new testing approaches. Education Week. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/03/13/25execsum.h33.html?qs=students+with+disabilities+and+the+online+environment.

Carr, T., & Prater, T. (2013). Transitioning to the common core: Incorporating iPads into Reading/English language arts. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, (1), 3855–3858.

Casey, D. (2008). A journey to legitimacy: The historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends, 52(2), 45–51. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0135-z

Cast. (2013). How has UDL been defined? National Center On Universal Design for Learning. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udldefined.

Cast. (2014). National Center On Universal Design for Learning. Retrieved October 18, 2014, from http://www.udlcenter.org/.

Coy, K. (2014). Special educators’ roles as virtual teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(5), 110–116. http://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914530100

Dickerson, E. (2012). A communitarian theory of the education rights of students with disabilities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(10), 1093–1109. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00788.x

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013). Common Core State Standards, Writing, and Students with LD: Recommendations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Wiley-Blackwell), 28(1), 28–37. http://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12004

Greer, D., Rowland, A. L., & Smith, S. J. (2014). Critical considerations for teaching students with disabilities in online environments. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(5), 79–91. http://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914528105

Hashey, A. I., & Stahl, S. (2014). Making online learning accessible for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(5), 70–78. http://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914528329

Hong, B. S. S., Ivy, W. F., Gonzalez, H. R., & Ehrensberger, W. (2007). Preparing students for postsecondary education. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(1), 32–38.

McCarthy, D. (2007). Teaching self-advocacy to students with disabilities. About Campus, 12(5), 10–16. http://doi.org/10.1002/abc.225

Molnar, A., Huerta, L., Rice, J. K., Barbour, M., Miron, G., Shafer, S. R., … Horvitz, B. (2014). Virtual Schools in the U.S. 2014: Politics, Performance, Policy, and Research Evidence. National Education Policy Center, 1–20.

Rao, K., & Tanners, A. (2011). Curb cuts in cyberspace: Universal instructional design for online courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(3), 211–229.

Reed, K. (1992). History of federal legislation for persons with disabilities. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(5), 397–408.

Smith, S. J., & Basham, J. D. (2014). Designing online learning opportunities for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(5), 127–137. http://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914530102

U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Building the legacy: IDEA 2004. Retrieved October 12, 2013, from http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,dynamic,TopicalBrief,10.

U.S. Disability Statisitics. (2013). Disability statistics. Retrieved October 12, 2013, from http://www.disabilitystatistics.org/reports/acs.cfm?statistic=2.

W3C. (2015). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/.

WebAIM. (2001). WAVE - Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool [organization]. Retrieved January 8, 2015, from http://wave.webaim.org/about.

WebAIM. (2014). WebAIM: Introduction to Web Accessibility. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://webaim.org/intro/.