Main Article Content
This paper proposes a model for implementing a college wide initiative designed to promote student competence with essential learning outcomes. This mixed-methods study combined descriptive and qualitative approaches to explore experiences of students and faculty as they engaged in a project that focused on the integration of essential learning outcomes (ELOs), The researchers relied on the use of descriptive statistics and interpretive phenomenological analysis to explore the phenomena that emerged while the faculty participants in this study engaged in a collaborative study group designed to support instructional pedagogy with the integration of ELOs and students’ experienced competence. Six themes emerged from the focus on ELO integration, including connection, awareness, utility, reflection, intention and facilitation. Additionally, using a student survey of self-perceived ELO competence from the beginning to the end of the semester, researchers found a difference in student ratings of 0.25, (p ≤ 0.05), suggesting an increase in student ELO competence. The findings support the importance of the themes identified and propose a model for successful ELO integration.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Tracking a global academic revolution Change Magazine, 42(2), 30-39. Also available from http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/March-April%202010/tracking-globalfull.html
Barber, M., Donnelly, K., & Rizvi, S. (2013). An avalanche is coming: Higher education and the revolution ahead. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/FINAL%20Embargoed%20Avalanche%20Paper%20130306%20%281%29.pdf
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13-25.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Cross, K. P. (1976). Accent on learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Cydis, S. (2014). Fostering competencies in future teachers: A competency-based approach to teacher education, Creative Education Journal, 5(13), 1148-1159.
Fink, L. D. (2013).Creating significant learning experiences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hesse-Biber, S., Kinder, T. S., & Dupuis, P. R. (2014). HyperResearch (Version 3.5.2) [Software]. Available from http://www.researchware.com/products/hyperresearch.html
Kuh, G., Jankowski, N., Ikenberry, S., & Kinzie, J. (2014). Knowing what students know and can do. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/2013%20Abridged%20Survey%20Report%20Final.pdf
Liberal Education and America’s Promise (2005). The Essential Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from http://leap.aacu.org/toolkit/wp-content/files_mf/leapelos.pdf
Lodge, J. M., & Bonsanquet, A. (2014). Evaluating quality learning in higher education: Reexamining the evidence, Quality in Higher Education, 20(1) 3-23.
Lumina Foundation (2011). The Degree Qualifications Profile. Retrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/tag/degree_profile/
Mansilla, V. B. (2005) Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads, Change, 37(1), 14-21.
NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 8, 2008.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2012). NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software (Version 8) [Software]. Available from http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx
Reiners, G. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husseri’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research, Journal of Nursing Care, 1(5) 119. Retrieved from http://omicsgroup.org/journals/understanding-the-differences-husserls-descriptiveand-heideggers-interpretive-phenomenological-research-2167-1168.1000119.php?aid=8614. Also available at http://omicsgroup.org/journals/understanding-the-differences-husserls-descriptive-andheideggers-interpretive-phenomenological-research-2167-1168.1000119.pdf
Richard Stockton College (2012). Essential Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from http://intraweb.stockton.edu/eyos/page.cfm?siteID=260&pageID=1
Shavelson, R. (2010). Measuring college learning responsibly: Accountability in a new era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Shuttleworth, M. (2009). Hawthorne Effect. Retrieved from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/hawthorne-effect
Spronken-Smith, R., Walker, R., Batchelor, J., O’Steen, B., & Angelo, T. (2012). Evaluating student perceptions of learning processes and intended learning outcomes under inquiry approaches, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 57-72.
Taylor, C. W. (1968). Cultivating new talents: A way to reach the educationally deprived. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 83-90.
Voorhees, R. A. (2001). Measuring what matters: Competency-based learning models in higher education. San Francisco, CA: New Directions for Institutional Research, Jossey-Bass Inc.
Walker, P. (2008). What do students think they (should) learn at college? Student perceptions of Essential Learning Outcomes, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 45-60.
Wehlburg, C. (2006) Meaningful course revision, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.