Main Article Content
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Gosser, D. K., & Roth, V. (1998). The workshop chemistry project: Peer-led team learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 185-187. doi:10.1021/ed075p185.
Bagozzi, R.P., & Burnkrant, R.E. (1979). Attitude measurement and behaviour change: a reconsideration of attitude organization and its relationship to behaviour. Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 295-302. doi: 10.1108/13612021011046101
Barbera, J., Adams, W.K., Wieman, C.E., & Perkins, K.K. (2008). Modifying and validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for use in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(10), 1435-1439. doi: 10.1021/ed085p1435
Bauer, C.F. (2008). Attitude towards chemistry: A semantic differential instrument for assessing curriculum impacts. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(10), 1440-1445. doi: 10.1021/ed085p1440
Berg, C. (2005). Factors relating to observed attitude change toward learning chemistry among university students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1039/b4rp90001d
Brandriet, A.R., Xu, X., Bretz, S.L., & Lewis, J.E. (2011). Diagnosing changes in attitude in first-year college chemistry students with a shortened version of Bauer’s semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2011, 12, 271-278.
Brown, S.J., Sharma, B.N., Wakeling, L., Naiker, M., Chandra, S., Gopalan, R.D., & Bilimoria, V.B. (2014). Quantifying attitude to chemistry in students at the University of the South Pacific. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 184-191. doi: 10.1039/c3rp00155e
Coll, R.K., Dalgety, J., & Salter, D. (2002). The development of the chemistry attitudes and experiences questionnaire (CAEQ). Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 3(1), 19-32. doi: 10.1039/b1rp90038b
Freedman, M.P. (1997). Relationships among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343-357. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<343::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-R
Grove, N.P, & Bretz S.L. (2007). CHEMX: Assessing students' cognitive expectations in learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(9), 1416-1424. doi: 10.1021/ed084p1524
Handelsman, M.M., Briggs, W.L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-191. doi: 10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
Heredia, K., & Lewis, J.E. (2012) A psychometric evaluation of the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for use in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 436-441. doi: 10.1021/ed100590t
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P.J. (2005). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, Hoboken, NY.
Lovelace, M., & Brickman, P. (2013). Best practices for measuring students’ attitudes toward learning science. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 12, 606-617. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-11-0197
Miller, R.B., Greene, B.A., Montalvo, G.P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J.D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388-422. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0028
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
Rosenberg, M.J., & Hovland, C.I. (1960). Cognitive, affective and behavioural components of attitudes. In M.J. Rosenberg & C.I. Hovland (Eds.) Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components. New Haven: Yale University Press, USA.
Steiner, R., & Sullivan, J. (1984). Variables correlating with student success in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 1072-1074. doi: 10.1021/ed061p1072
Xu, X., & Lewis, J.E. (2011). Refinement of a chemistry attitude measure for college students. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 561-568. doi: 10.1021/ed900071q
Xu, X., Southam, D., & Lewis, J.E. (2012). Attitude toward the subject of chemistry in Australia: An ALIUS and POGIL collaboration to promote cross-national comparisons. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 72, 32-36.
Xu, X., Villafane, S.M., & Lewis, J.E. (2013). College students’ attitudes toward chemistry, conceptual knowledge and achievement: structural equation model analysis. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 188-200. doi: 10.1039/c3rp20170h