Training final year students in data presentation skills with an iterative report-feedback cycle

Main Article Content

Heather Verkade


Although practical laboratory activities are often considered the linchpin of science education, asking students to produce many large practical reports can be problematic Practical reports require diverse skills, and therefore do not focus the students’ attention on any one skill. They are also time-consuming to write and mark, limiting the speed at which feedback can be returned. To refocus students specifically on the skills of data presentation and interpretation I asked the students to produce a results figure, as would be found in a journal article, one for each of four practical topics. The students found this a challenge, but their skills improved markedly over the semester due to an efficient feedback cycle. Students were very engaged with this assessment, as it caused them to re-consider what they understood about the results of the practical. As this assessment is a small focused version of a practical report, it allows faster marking and return of practicals, and reduces the proportion of marks allocated to practicals, allowing more marks to be allocated to other components of the unit/class such as exams. This is therefore a successful method of focusing students’ attention on presenting and interpreting practical results, in an efficient and cost-effective manner.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Verkade, H. (2015). Training final year students in data presentation skills with an iterative report-feedback cycle. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 70–82.


Adams, D. J. (2009). Current trends in laboratory class teaching in university bioscience programmes. Bioscience Education, 13. doi: 10.3108/beej.13.3

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Collis, M., Gibson, A., Hughes, I., Sayers, G., & Todd, M. (2008). The student view of 1st year laboratory work in the biosciences — Score gamma? Bioscience Education, 11. doi: 10.3108/beej.11.2

Corradi, H. R. (2012). A sample practical report to facilitate writing in the scientific style. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40(1), 65-67. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20571

Deiner, L. J., Newsome, D., & Samaroo, D. (2012). Directed self-inquiry: A scaffold for teaching laboratory report writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(12), 1511-1514. doi: 10.1021/ed300169g

Gratz, R. K. (1990). Improving lab report quality by model analysis, peer review, and revision. Journal of College Science Teaching, 19(5), 292-295.

Greenbowe, T. J., Rudd, J. A., & Hand, B. M. (2007). Using the science writing heuristic to improve students' understanding of general equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(12), 2007. doi: 10.1021/ed084p2007

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106

Hughes, I. (2004). Coping strategies for staff involved in assessment of laboratory write-ups. Bioscience Education, 3. doi: 10.3108/beej.2004.03000005

Jones, H. (2009). Teaching undergraduates to write practical reports. Centre for Bioscience Bulletin 26. Retrieved from

Kirschner, P. A., & Meester, M. A. M. (1988). The laboratory in higher science education: Problems, premises and objectives. Higher Education, 17(1), 81-98. doI: 10.1007/BF00130901

Lerner, N. (2007). Laboratory lessons for writing and science. Written Communication, 24(3), 191-222. doi: 10.1177/0741088307302765

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090

Parry, D., Larsen, C., & Walsh, C. (2008). Summative assessment with formative feedback: An intervention in a small bioscience cohort. Bioscience Education, 11. doi: 10.3108/beej.11.c2

Race, P. (2005). Learning through feedback. Making learning happen. London: Sage.

Tilstra, L. (2001). Using journal articles to teach writing skills for laboratory reports in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(6), 762. doi: 10.1021/ed078p762

Walsh, C., Parry, D., & Larsen, C. (2010). Blending learning: a novel assessment strategy enhancing student learning from practical work in the laboratory. Bioscience Education, 15. doi: 10.3108/beej.15.c2

Watson, D., & Knight, G. L. (2012). Continuous formative assessment and feedback in an enquiry-based laboratory course. Bioscience Education, 20, 101-105. doi: 10.11120/beej.2012.20000101

Whelan, R. J., & Zare, R. N. (2003). Teaching effective communication in a writing-intensive analytical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(8), 904. doi: 10.1021/ed080p904

Wilson, J., Adams, D., Arkle, S., Bevan, R., Boachie-Ansah, G., Bradshaw, T. . . Wilson, J. (2008). Report: 1st year practicals: Their role in developing future bioscientists. Retrieved from