Main Article Content
Although practical laboratory activities are often considered the linchpin of science education, asking students to produce many large practical reports can be problematic Practical reports require diverse skills, and therefore do not focus the students’ attention on any one skill. They are also time-consuming to write and mark, limiting the speed at which feedback can be returned. To refocus students specifically on the skills of data presentation and interpretation I asked the students to produce a results figure, as would be found in a journal article, one for each of four practical topics. The students found this a challenge, but their skills improved markedly over the semester due to an efficient feedback cycle. Students were very engaged with this assessment, as it caused them to re-consider what they understood about the results of the practical. As this assessment is a small focused version of a practical report, it allows faster marking and return of practicals, and reduces the proportion of marks allocated to practicals, allowing more marks to be allocated to other components of the unit/class such as exams. This is therefore a successful method of focusing students’ attention on presenting and interpreting practical results, in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, (CC-BY) 4.0 International, allowing others to share the work with proper acknowledgement and citation of the work's authorship and initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- Authors are able to enter separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
- In pursuit of manuscripts of the highest quality, multiple opportunities for mentoring, and greater reach and citation of JoSoTL publications, JoSoTL encourages authors to share their drafts to seek feedback from relevant communities unless the manuscript is already under review or in the publication queue after being accepted. In other words, to be eligible for publication in JoSoTL, manuscripts should not be shared publicly (e.g., online), while under review (after being initially submitted, or after being revised and resubmitted for reconsideration), or upon notice of acceptance and before publication. Once published, authors are strongly encouraged to share the published version widely, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Adams, D. J. (2009). Current trends in laboratory class teaching in university bioscience programmes. Bioscience Education, 13. doi: 10.3108/beej.13.3
Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collis, M., Gibson, A., Hughes, I., Sayers, G., & Todd, M. (2008). The student view of 1st year laboratory work in the biosciences — Score gamma? Bioscience Education, 11. doi: 10.3108/beej.11.2
Corradi, H. R. (2012). A sample practical report to facilitate writing in the scientific style. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40(1), 65-67. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20571
Deiner, L. J., Newsome, D., & Samaroo, D. (2012). Directed self-inquiry: A scaffold for teaching laboratory report writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(12), 1511-1514. doi: 10.1021/ed300169g
Gratz, R. K. (1990). Improving lab report quality by model analysis, peer review, and revision. Journal of College Science Teaching, 19(5), 292-295.
Greenbowe, T. J., Rudd, J. A., & Hand, B. M. (2007). Using the science writing heuristic to improve students' understanding of general equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(12), 2007. doi: 10.1021/ed084p2007
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
Hughes, I. (2004). Coping strategies for staff involved in assessment of laboratory write-ups. Bioscience Education, 3. doi: 10.3108/beej.2004.03000005
Jones, H. (2009). Teaching undergraduates to write practical reports. Centre for Bioscience Bulletin 26. Retrieved from http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/newsletters/bulletin26.pdf
Kirschner, P. A., & Meester, M. A. M. (1988). The laboratory in higher science education: Problems, premises and objectives. Higher Education, 17(1), 81-98. doI: 10.1007/BF00130901
Lerner, N. (2007). Laboratory lessons for writing and science. Written Communication, 24(3), 191-222. doi: 10.1177/0741088307302765
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
Parry, D., Larsen, C., & Walsh, C. (2008). Summative assessment with formative feedback: An intervention in a small bioscience cohort. Bioscience Education, 11. doi: 10.3108/beej.11.c2
Race, P. (2005). Learning through feedback. Making learning happen. London: Sage.
Tilstra, L. (2001). Using journal articles to teach writing skills for laboratory reports in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(6), 762. doi: 10.1021/ed078p762
Walsh, C., Parry, D., & Larsen, C. (2010). Blending learning: a novel assessment strategy enhancing student learning from practical work in the laboratory. Bioscience Education, 15. doi: 10.3108/beej.15.c2
Watson, D., & Knight, G. L. (2012). Continuous formative assessment and feedback in an enquiry-based laboratory course. Bioscience Education, 20, 101-105. doi: 10.11120/beej.2012.20000101
Whelan, R. J., & Zare, R. N. (2003). Teaching effective communication in a writing-intensive analytical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(8), 904. doi: 10.1021/ed080p904
Wilson, J., Adams, D., Arkle, S., Bevan, R., Boachie-Ansah, G., Bradshaw, T. . . Wilson, J. (2008). Report: 1st year practicals: Their role in developing future bioscientists. Retrieved from www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/reports/pracworkshopreport.pdf