Let’s Get Ethical: An Exploration of Undergraduate Decision Making Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has prompted students at Indiana University Bloomington (IUB) to confront questions about its ethical use in coursework, especially in the absence of consistent university policies and guidelines. This study explores undergraduate students’ perceptions and beliefs regarding the ethical use of GenAI in academic work. Specifically, it addresses two research questions: (1) How do IUB undergraduate students define the ethical use of GenAI in their academic work? and (2) What factors influence students’ decisions to use GenAI? Understanding these questions is critical as GenAI becomes increasingly prevalent in higher education. Faculty and staff must grasp the motivations behind students’ use of GenAI to establish shared expectations for ethical AI use and the situations it is appropriate. Grounded in Rest’s Four Component Model of Moral Decision Making, this study employed an open-ended qualitative survey distributed across the Bloomington campus to collect student perspectives. Thematic analysis of the narrative survey responses will reveal key themes regarding when students consider GenAI use appropriate and the factors influencing their decisions. Findings aim to inform institutional policies and foster alignment between educators and students on ethical GenAI use for students’ coursework.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with the Journal of the Indiana University Student Personnel Association (hereinafter “the Journal”) agree to the following terms:
By submitting to the Journal, the author grants to the Journal the non-exclusive right to reproduce, translate (as defined below), and/or distribute your submission worldwide in print and electronic format and in any medium, including but not limited to audio or video.
The author agrees that the Journal may, without changing the content, translate the submission to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation.
The author agrees that the Journal may keep more than one copy of this submission for purposes of security, back-up and preservation.
The author represents that the submission is his/her original work, and that s/he has the right to grant the rights contained in this agreement. The author also represents that his/her submission does not, to the best of his/her knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.