<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">40133</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Dianna Bell - Review of Matthew Engelke and Matt Tomlinson, editors, The Limits of Meaning: Case Studies in the Anthropology of Christianity</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Dianna Bell</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>University of Idaho</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2007</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Matthew Engelke and Matt Tomlinson, editors</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>The Limits of Meaning: Case Studies in the Anthropology of Christianity
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2006</year>
                <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Berghahn Books</publisher-name>
                <page-range>248 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>1-84545-170-8 (hard cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p><italic>The Limits of Meaning: Case Studies in the Anthropology of Christianity
            </italic>is a collection of eight articles written by anthropologists whose research
            deals specifically with Christianity. The majority of the essays were originally
            presented in the “Christian Ritual and the Limits of Meaning” session at the American
            Anthropological Association conference in 2002. The book’s editors, Matthew Engelke and
            Matt Tomlinson, have conducted extensive research in the anthropology of Christianity.
            Engelke focuses primarily on Christianity and spirit possession in Zimbabwe, while
            Tomlinson concentrates on ritual and Christianity in Fiji.</p>
        <p>The first chapter serves as a thoughtful introduction to the complexity of the ideas
            presented in the book. Drawing primarily from Talal Asad’s criticism of Clifford Geertz,
            Tomlinson and Engelke suggest that not all religious symbols and actions are embodied
            with meaning. They reason that, if actions, words, and objects have the ability to carry
            meaning, then, similarly, they must also have the potential to bear limited or no
            meaning. Both Chapter One and the Afterword, which is offered by Joel Robbins,
            convincingly argue that Christianity is a religion entrenched in not only physical
            symbols, but also in symbolic language and behavior. Accordingly, it is the faith’s
            responsibility to isolate these symbols and create meaning from them. If such is the
            case, how do Christians deal with situations in which meaning is denied, overshadowed,
            or non-existent? Tomlinson and Engelke wisely do not restrict themselves to a concise
            definition of “meaning.” Rather, they offer a thorough explanation of how meaning can be
            used as a structure, an intention, a symbol, and a being.</p>
        <p>The volume focuses primarily on situations in which traditional Christian meaningfulness
            has been violated. The sites represented in the book include Sweden, Zimbabwe, West
            Papua, Fiji, Samoa, Bolivia, and the United States. Because the region, type of
            Christian worship, and the doctrinal focus vary with each contributor, every chapter
            offers a unique assessment of how Christians encounter meaning.</p>
        <p>Simon Coleman describes a Charismatic sermon in Sweden in which the preacher
            uncharacteristically concludes his sermon with complete silence. The preacher’s
            intention was to demonstrate the power and godliness of silence and to remind his
            congregation of the importance of words by eliminating them. The congregation, however,
            had difficulty knowing how to understand this finale. Matthew Engelke’s contribution
            involves the Masowe Church in Zimbabwe and details a leader who asks his followers a
            question they are unable to answer. Engelke argues that the interplay between ambiguity
            and clarity is a tool leaders often intentionally use in order to limit meaning and
            understanding. Erica Bornstein discusses an anti-climatic prayer meeting in Zimbabwe of
            limited import. Bornstein compares the meeting to the 1950s “theater of the absurd,” in
            which entire plays were based on the premise of nothing of any significance ever
            occurring. Bornstein wisely points out that the genuine absence of meaning is far
            different from meaninglessness: the latter offers hope that meaning will eventually turn
            up. Danilyn Rutherford discusses the manipulation of meaning in West Papua to ensure
            that rituals, texts, and positions of authority carry only the precise meanings
            intended. Rutherford writes that missions, schools, and churches all manipulate meaning
            to suit their purposes. A central theme of the chapter is Rutherford’s contention that
            the management of meaning is possible due largely to the Church’s presence in social and
            political spheres. Rutherford convincingly argues the deliberate production of meaning
            and interpretations in Christianity. Focusing on the construction of meaning and purpose
            in Methodist sermons in Fiji, Matt Tomlinson examines the effects on church followers of
            sermons that fail to create meaning. Tomlinson also details the importance of meaning in
            both Christianity and scholarly ethnographies. Ilana Gershon discusses meaninglessness
            as a motivator in Samoa. Specifically, she explains how limits in meaning motivate
            Samoans to convert to other forms of Christianity which provide them with more
            meaningful explanations and experiences. Gershon provides an example of such a
            conversion through an excerpt of an interview with a couple who converted to Mormonism
            after finding that faith better suited to their moral orientation. Andrew Orta describes
            how meaning seems to be overextended in Bolivia. Specifically, Orta smartly explains the
            phenomenon of enculturation and how this affects Christian values and meaning, and
            potentially leads to its augmentation. In the final chapter, James D. Faubion explores
            Seventh-day Adventism in the United States. Faubion details the life and revelations of
            a devout follower and connects her experiences to the importance of rituals, prophets,
            dualism, and the paranomic.</p>
        <p><italic>Limits of Meaning </italic>is an important contribution to the growing literature
            on and interest in the anthropological study of Christianity. For those less interested
            in Christianity, the book remains significant as it connects the essays under a common
            theme that is pertinent to the current discussions within the field of the anthropology
            of religion. Furthermore, <italic>Limits of Meaning </italic>is exceptional in its
            presentation of ethnographic fieldwork. Rather than interpreting events of obvious
            significance, the contributors each competently discuss actions of imperfect
            consequence. The book might have benefited from a contribution exploring the limits of
            meaning in regards to physical symbols in Christianity, but it is a robust survey
            nonetheless. Those interested in religion, the phenomenon of meaning, or fresh
            approaches to presenting ethnography will find <italic>Limits of Meaning
            </italic>stimulating.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 868 words • Review posted on April 5, 2007]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>