<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">39824</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Jessica Anderson Turner - Review of Charles Reagan Wilson, editor, The New Encyclopedia of Southern Culture, Volume 4: Myth, Manners, and Memory</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Jessica Anderson Turner</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff> Indiana University</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2008</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Charles Reagan Wilson, editor</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>The New Encyclopedia of Southern Culture, Volume 4: Myth, Manners, and Memory
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2006</year>
                <publisher-loc>Chapel Hill</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>University of North Carolina Press</publisher-name>
                <page-range>312 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>0-8078-3029-1 (hard cover), 0-8078-5692-4 (soft cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>Sponsored by the Center for the Study of Southern Culture at the University of
            Mississippi and published by the University of North Carolina Press, <italic>The New
                Encyclopedia of Southern Culture</italic> is a twenty-four volume series that is a
            revised and expanded version of the original <italic>Encyclopedia of Southern
                Culture</italic> published as a single volume in 1989. Currently, the first ten
            volumes of <italic>The New Encyclopedia of Southern Culture</italic> are in print.
            Volume 4, <italic>Myths, Manners, and Memory</italic>, is a highly relevant and
            provocative collection that deals with collective attitudes, beliefs, and memories about
            the fluid and contested region of the South.</p>
        <p>At first glance, one might assume that <italic>Myths, Manners, and Memory</italic> is an
            unlikely assembly of three unlucky letter “M”s, caught in the categorizational fervor of
            encyclopedia-making. On the contrary, however, these topics merge quite poignantly in
            this collection. This volume “examines how representations of the region and its people,
            their patterns of etiquette and social interaction, and their remembrance of the past
            have helped make it a region that resonates with people who see its many creative
            expressions” (xvii). Many scholars recognize that myths about the South have played a
            role in making the South a distinctive region (xvii), validating beliefs about the South
            in narratives of a collective consciousness. It is impossible to separate the physical
            region of the South from the mythic South that is socially constructed, and the overview
            of these ideas provided in this volume is tantamount to understanding why the South is
            such an enduring concept.</p>
        <p>The notions of historical memory and a mythic South are two that naturally seem fitting
            to be included in the same volume, and entries on historical memory, such as
            “Confederate Monuments,” “Museums,” or “Jim Crow,” or on specific myths such as
            “Plantation Myth,” “New South Myth,” “Garden Myth,” or “Lost Cause Myth” are documented.
            Often, however, these concepts merge in discussions of specific topics such as “Civil
            War Reenactments,” “Fighting South,” or “Stereotypes.” Social interaction is discussed
            throughout the volume and specifically the entries “Etiquette of Race Relations in the
            Jim Crow South,” “Ladies and Gentlemen,” “Manners,” and “Visiting.” Some entries morph
            into accounts of Southern meaning, such as those on “Community,” “Family,” and
            “Sexuality.” For example, in “Family,” author Ted Ownby writes that “People in the South
            sometimes like to claim that an attachment to family, or even a sense of family, is an
            important regional trait, but their definitions of family vary so widely that it is
            clear the concept has far different meanings for different people. Perhaps the best
            generalization is that people in the South have often used the concept of the family to
            think and argue--and have sometimes used it to fight--about who they are and want to be”
            (55). In fact, it is often a southern-specific interpretation of meaning that is
            discussed in many of the individual entries, such as “Beauty,” “Sexuality,” and “Sense
            of Place.”</p>
        <p>While the contributors to this volume occasionally make generalized statements about the
            whole South or all Southerners, most often care is taken to provide specific
            ethnographic examples that stand on their own rather than unnecessarily represent the
            entirety. Because the work is an encyclopedia, many of the entries focus on breadth over
            time rather than depth. However, the majority of this volume is richly detailed and
            theoretically engaging. The volume is abundant with theoretical perspectives, even
            including entries on “Modernism and Postmodernism.” The “Cult of Beauty” entry is
            particularly notable and includes much research on the myth of southern beauty,
            particularly as it pertains to beauty pageants and the energy and expense that
            Southerners spend on pageantry, “rituals that perform a specific, regional notion of
            gender.” This entry combines well with others such as “Gays” and “Sexuality” for an
            overall portrayal of gender and sexuality in the South.</p>
        <p>One criticism of this otherwise remarkable volume is that this volume of <italic>The New
                Encyclopedia</italic> often seems to be an updated account of the Old South,
            dwelling on history rather than the present day (<italic>History</italic> is a separate
            volume in the encyclopedia series), and contemporary practices are discussed in some
            entries only as afterthoughts. The volume’s emphasis on historical memory
            notwithstanding, entries that focus on memory such as that on “Confederate Monuments”
            merely hint at contemporary consciousness, as when author Thomas Brown notes “several
            attempts to remove or recontextualize” some Confederate monuments. More detail about
            contemporary interactions with historical memory--the reinterpretation and
            recontextualization of memory--would reveal change in collective consciousness that is
            noteworthy. The entry “Manners” contains some interesting contemporary anecdotal
            material that makes one wish for deeper analysis of today’s practices. While these
            historical analyses of southern cultural history are indeed fascinating and important,
            more focus on contemporary practices would be welcome additions to this volume. Notable
            exceptions to the volume’s heavy focus on the past are the entries “Motherhood” and
            “Sexuality,” which draw from and interpret contemporary practice.</p>
        <p>Ironically, my criticism is itself addressed in the entry “Memory,” in which author W.
            Scott Poole writes that some Southerners argue that there is a Southern obsession with
            the past (106). Indeed, the South maintains a “culture of remembrance” in which
            remembering, commemorating, and re-interpreting the past are flourishing activities
            reserved not only for scholars. It is this culture of remembrance as it is practiced
            today that deserves equal documentation in <italic>The New Encyclopedia of Southern
                Culture: Myths, Manners, and Memory</italic>. Quibbles aside, this volume is an
            extraordinary collection of topics that encompass the beliefs and attitudes that define
            the South and is an essential read for those who wish to understand how the South is
            imagined and lived.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 949 words • Review posted on August 5, 2008]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>