<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">39617</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>ReviwerNameReviewofBookAuthorsNameBookTitle</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Lee Haring - Review of Emmanouela Katrinaki, Le Cannibalisme dans le Conte Merveilleux Grec: Questions d’interprétation et de Typologie (Folklore Fellows Communications 295)</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Lee Haring</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2009</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Emmanouela Katrinaki</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Le Cannibalisme dans le Conte Merveilleux Grec: Questions d’interprétation et de Typologie (Folklore Fellows Communications 295)
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2008</year>
                <publisher-loc>Helsinki</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Academia Scientiarum Fennica/Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia</publisher-name>
                <page-range>328 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>978-951-41-1025-2 (hard cover), 978-951-41-1026-9 (soft cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>In 1926, French psychoanalysts sufficiently overcame the objections of medical and
            psychiatric professionals to establish an Institute of Psychoanalysis. Thenceforward
            French intellectuals took up this revelatory system of thought, but when Freud died in
            1939, psychoanalysis was still controversial. Thereafter, psychoanalysts around the
            world multiplied, then diminished, but at the death of Jacques Lacan in 1981, France had
            more psychoanalysts per capita than any other nation. The psychoanalytic criticism of
            literature there has had notable champions: Charles Mauron, Jean Bellemin-Noël, Hélène
            Cixous, even Roland Barthes. For folktale it has had one: Nicole Belmont, who shows in
                <italic>Poétique du conte</italic> (1999) how, without ignoring the Grimms, the
            Finnish school, or V. Propp, Freudian dream interpretation can be adapted to oral
            literature. Folktales invite criticism as if they were collective dreams. The book under
            review, a dissertation written under Nicole Belmont’s direction, tests and validates
            psychoanalytic criticism of folktale by concentrating on a single theme, fictional
            cannibalism, in a defined corpus, wonder tales orally told, from a single nation and
            language, Greece. The author seeks to establish what anthropophagy may mean for the
            psychological development of heroes and heroines. Despite a perhaps inevitably tedious
            dissertation style, the author knows the corpus of her materials well, shows admirable
            grasp of the history of folktale analysis, and presents convincing if limited
            interpretations of Greek versions, which will not be familiar to many scholars.</p>
        <p>After a detailed introduction forecasting the contents, the book is divided into three
            parts, each with its own introduction explaining, in good dissertation style, what will
            come next. The first part deals with two tale types about daughters who are depicted in
            Greek tradition as eating their parents—Cinderella (Aarne-Thompson-Uther 510A) and the
            Cannibal Sister (ATU 315A). Greek versions of type 510A show cannibalism as an
            insuperable obstacle to a daughter’s marriage. Two daughters kill and eat their mother,
            thus regressing to the oral stage of the libido and dooming them to celibacy; the third
            daughter, by identifying herself with their mother, attains sexual maturity. The tale of
            the <italic>Strigla</italic>, who incessantly devours animals, then is discovered and
            destroyed by her brother, shows the link between oral and incest fantasies; both tales
            trace cannibalistic representations to the primordial relation between mother and child
            (295). Here and in all the texts discussed, cannibalism is decisive in shaping the
            initiatory path of the hero or heroine towards maturity.</p>
        <p>In the second part, the author takes up cannibal parents, treating Greek versions of
            Little Brother and Little Sister (ATU 450), The Devil (Witch) Carries the Hero Home in a
            Sack (ATU 327C), and The Brothers and the Ogre (ATU 327B + 328). She proposes that in
            these texts, ogres and ogresses represent both father and mother figures to the hero. In
            ATU 450, a return to the womb constitutes a mythic sort of dénouement, which violates
            the norms of the folktale genre. One type (327C) is one of the few especially aimed for
            children. Its ogress is a cannibalistic mother figure, who must be tricked and trapped
            by the tiny, potentially edible hero. To deal with the threat of a man-eater, he
            utilizes the ogress’s very own means, thus representing “the sadistic aspect of
            infantile oral fantasies” (299). The Greek Tom Thumb—in a rich collection of varied
            texts, some showing the influence of Perrault, others departing from him—is shown
            traversing orality and emerging victorious from the Oedipal stage.</p>
        <p>Analyzing, in her third part, the Rescue by the Sister (ATU 311) and The Ghoulish
            Schoolmaster and the Stone of Pity (ATU 894), the author shows connections to other tale
            types. Though she treats each type as a semantic unit, thus honoring the history of
            folktale classification, her Greek versions show the same tendency to escape strict
            classification that transpires from Hans-Georg Uther’s revision of Aarne and Thompson
            (reviewed by <ext-link
                xlink:href="https://wayback.archive-it.org/219/20220511223608/https://jfr.sitehost.iu.edu/%E2%80%9Chttp://www.indiana.edu/~jofr/review.php?id=127%E2%80%9D"
                >William Hansen in <italic>JFRR</italic> in 2005</ext-link>). But the Greek corpus
            rewards study. In type 311, cannibalism is interpreted as the heroine’s representation
            to herself of what sexuality looks like at the moment she discovers it. In other tale
            types, a girl again discovers the cannibal nature of her husband, a theme so widespread
            (we think of Bluebeard and the African tale of the <italic>fille difficile</italic>)
            that Emmanouela Katrinaki’s insistence on the initiatory character of most folktales is
            confirmed.</p>
        <p>Such patient, detailed narrative and comparative analysis helps to demonstrate the
            relevance of psychoanalytic interpretation to folktale study, at a time when American
            folklorists continue to resist it. It would be difficult to refute Emmanouela
            Katrinaki’s contention that cannibalism, like other folktale themes, is always
            symbolizing something about family relations, sexual development, and oral and incest
            fantasies. But the contention is addressed only to her colleagues. For readers outside
            the academy, the startling quality of Freudian interpretation would still have charm, if
            it were given a shorter and more forceful presentation.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 801 words • Review posted on October 27, 2009]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>