<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">39537</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>David A. McDonald - Review of John O’Flynn, The Irishness of Irish Music (Ashgate Popular and Folk Music Series)</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>David A. McDonald</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Indiana University</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2010</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>John O’Flynn</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>The Irishness of Irish Music (Ashgate Popular and Folk Music Series)
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2009</year>
                <publisher-loc>Burlington, VT</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Ashgate Publishing</publisher-name>
                <page-range>256 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>978-0-7546-5714-9 (hard cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>So what makes it Irish? Or rather, what is particularly Irish about Irish music? In eight
            well-organized, neatly subdivided chapters, John O’Flynn draws together a diverse set of
            analytical tools with which to answer some of these basic questions. A timely
            contribution to the fields of ethnomusicology, musicology, folklore, Irish and European
            studies, <italic>The Irishness of Irish Music</italic> offers the reader unique insight
            into the relations between production and consumption practices and larger
            socio-cultural discourses of authenticity and national identity formation in the Irish
            Republic.</p>
        <p>O’Flynn’s important study succeeds among a burgeoning field of ethnomusicological
            monographs on Irish music. Within the last two years major works from Helen O’Shea
            (2008), Fintan Vallely (2008), and Sean Williams (2010) (to name but a few) have
            considerably expanded the breadth and depth of Irish music studies. Coupled with the
            recent establishment of a special interest group in Irish music sponsored by the Society
            for Ethnomusicology, it seems that the scholarly study of Irish music (particularly in
            North America) has firmly taken root in the academy. In this regard, O’Flynn offers an
            important contribution to this literature, precisely in his detailed analysis of
            consumption practices and performance reception among Irish audiences.</p>
        <p>O’Flynn’s introductory chapter outlines an interpretive framework for understanding Irish
            music based on a review of the relevant literature. While such an in-depth literature
            review is rare in contemporary ethnomusicology, it does provide the uninitiated reader
            with a solid foundation for engaging O’Flynn’s later discussions of music consumption
            and aesthetics. In chapter 2 O’Flynn presents a brief history of Irish music, tracing
            its development from the folk-inspired “ballad boom” of the 1960s to the World Beat
            productions of the early 2000s. Following this, O’Flynn provides some of his most
            important insights in chapter 3, offering a detailed statistical analysis of Irish
            musical production, distribution, and consumption practices. In chapter 4 O’Flynn
            attempts an ethnographic examination of three archetypal sites (and genres) of Irish
            music performance: classical, traditional, and popular. Here O’Flynn mediates his
            earlier statistical analysis with qualitative interview data grounded in everyday
            musical practices and beliefs. The various themes and issues that arise in this segment
            of the book serve as a springboard for further introspection in the remainder of the
            book. In chapter 5 O’Flynn critically interrogates the influence of traditional musics
            in the national imaginary, following this with an exploration of alternative conceptions
            of national identity in chapter 6. In the final two chapters of the book O’Flynn folds
            his quantitative and qualitative data together into a larger discussion of Irish
            authenticity, first by looking specifically into the analysis of musical sound and
            meaning, and later examining the dialectical relationships at the heart of Irish
            identity.</p>
        <p>O’Flynn nestles his discussion of Irish national identity within a field of inquiry that
            wavers between essentialist and anti-essentialist tendencies. Too often the field of
            Irish cultural studies has been dominated by the analytical tendency to see Irish
            identity as a given, stable, and coherent mode of consciousness. Recent academic
            scholarship has begun to critically engage these essentialist tropes, arguing for a more
            fluid understanding of Irish identity as a social construction. While O’Flynn recognizes
            the importance of anti-essentialist approaches, he reminds the reader that this
            framework is not necessarily replicated in the everyday practices and interpretations of
            his interlocutors. Instead, O’Flynn attempts to juxtapose established theories of
            Irishness with the everyday assumptions and beliefs of those who produce and consume
            Irish music. To do this he seeks out the opinions of producers and consumers alike, and
            interprets these diverse “perspectives in relation to the range of cultural practices
            and products from which they arise” (18). This approach successfully balances everyday
            assertions of Irishness within larger discourses of authenticity in Irish music and
            performance.</p>
        <p>Since O’Flynn takes on such an important and timely project, there are several aspects of
            his theoretical and methodological approach that might require further explanation.
            While we are warned against essentializing Irish identity around celebratory tropes,
            O’Flynn sees little problem in deploying rigid (essentialist) genre formations
            (classical, traditional, and popular) to advance his argument. These unproblematized
            categories of musical practice prove to be blunt instruments for understanding the
            heterogeneous, processual, and contingent aspects of music performance and identity
            formation in Ireland. Rather, in examining parallel discourses of authenticity and
            national identity formation these very concepts might have been a more appropriate site
            for analysis.</p>
        <p>Likewise, it is curious that in a book on Irish identity, O’Flynn circumscribes his
            analysis so narrowly to indigenous Irish citizens of the Republic, avoiding the
            entanglements of Northern Ireland or the millions who claim Irish ancestry in diaspora.
            In his attempt to examine musical practices through which Irish identity is articulated,
            O’Flynn strategically restricts the discussion to those whom he defines
            unproblematically as “Irish.” It would seem that a discussion of Irish identity among
            those for whom such a marker is not presumed, but rather must be continually asserted in
            dialogic relations with a non-Irish “other,” would have led to a more nuanced
            understanding of the myriad ways in which Irishness is constituted, performed, and
            consumed.</p>
        <p>Despite these minor qualifications, throughout his analysis O’Flynn demonstrates a
            command of the relevant literature on Irish music, greatly expanding our understanding
            of often under-acknowledged aspects of musical practice in Ireland.</p>
        <p>WORKS CITED</p>
        <p>O’Shea, Helen. <italic>The Making of Irish Traditional Music</italic>. Cork: Cork
            University Press, 2008.</p>
        <p>Vallely, Fintan. <italic>Traditional Music and Identity in Northern Ireland</italic>.
            Cork: Cork University Press, 2008.</p>
        <p>Williams, Sean. <italic>Focus: Irish Traditional Music</italic>. New York: Routledge
            Press, 2010.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 912 words • Review posted on March 30, 2010]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>