<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">39186</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Nicolasa M. Chavez - Review of Michelle Heffner Hayes, Flamenco: Conflicting Histories of the Dance</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Nicolasa M. Chavez</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Museum of International Folk Art</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2011</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Michelle Heffner Hayes</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Flamenco: Conflicting Histories of the Dance
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2009</year>
                <publisher-loc>Jefferson, NC</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>McFarland Publishers</publisher-name>
                <page-range>212 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>978-0-7864-3923-2 (soft cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>Michelle Heffner Hayes adds to the contemporary scene of flamenco research and
            scholarship with this book. Hayes uses a multidisciplinary approach by incorporating
            anthropological, post-modernist, post-colonial, film, and feminist critiques and
            theories and applying them to a multitude of flamenco histories. In using the term
            “history” Hayes refers to multiple forms of representation that tell the story of
            flamenco. These include nineteenth-century Romantic travel writers, early-twentieth
            century scholarship, documentary film and fictional cinematography, and live performance
            during the past decade. The book is divided into seven chapters and also contains
            chapter notes, a bibliography, and an index. Hayes uses the narratives to portray the
            development of and reason for the image of the flamenco woman as the desired “exotic
            other.” The various incarnations of this image and how and why people incorporate that
            imagery into their own histories is the main theme of this book. The continual theme of
            the female dancer as the exotic other and how this ideal is used, interpreted, or
            re-invented is carried throughout the book.</p>
        <p>Chapter 1, titled “Desiring Narratives: Flamenco in History and Film,” introduces the
            premises for the following chapters. The author discusses how the colonial gaze of the
            onlooker, tourist, or foreign flamencophile has affected and influenced how the world
            understands the traditional art form of flamenco and the role of the female dancer
            within that tradition. Chapter 2, titled “Purism, Tourism and Lost Innocence,” deals
            with travel writers of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. The
            development of Prosper Merimeé’s <italic>Carmen</italic> and how this character became
            the idealized image of flamenco women is traced. The author divulges how past foreign
            flamencophiles used, co-opted, re-invented, or re-interpreted the romanticized folkloric
            roots of flamenco and how these authors claim their own authority over the histories
            they have written.</p>
        <p>In the third chapter, “Imagining Andalusia,” Hayes compares “scholarly” works on flamenco
            written during the twentieth century. She discusses foreign flamencophiles who have
            lived amongst the practitioners of flamenco in Andalusia and how these authors claimed
            to “know” flamenco from the inside and therefore were entitled to write proper
            historical narratives. These writers emphasize a nostalgia for flamenco’s past and the
            “pure” aesthetic. This purist aesthetic is deeply shaped and influenced by the image of
            the female flamenco dancer.</p>
        <p>In the fourth chapter, “Fatal Filmic Flamencas,” Hayes returns to the image of Carmen as
            portrayed in fictional Spanish cinema. She discusses how the image of the
                <italic>flamenca</italic> was used to represent a general image of Spanishness in
            twentieth-century film. She also looks at the early collaborative films of director
            Carlos Saura and dancer Antonito Gades, known for creating the modern flamenco
            dance-drama. Hayes uses these films to compare and contrast the central role of the
            female and how her presence and actions are pivotal to every other role in the
            films.</p>
        <p>The next chapter, “Realism Reinvented,” discusses the modern flamenco documentary. The
            first part of the chapter relies heavily on previous research by anthropologist William
            Washabaugh, who studied the documentary series, <italic>Rito y Geografía del Cante
                Flamenco</italic>, which aired during the Franco years. Hayes continues Washabaugh’s
            discussion on how artists used traditional imagery to combat
                <italic>nacionalflamenquismo</italic> under the Franco dictatorship. Hayes then
            continues her discussion with the documentary style of filmmaker Carlos Saura and his
            films <italic>Flamenco</italic> and <italic>Sevillanas</italic>. According to Hayes
            these works used multi-textured/multi-layered imagery to portray both traditional and
            contemporary themes within flamenco.</p>
        <p>Chapter 6, “Reinterpreting the Exotic,” continues the discussion of the image of the
            exotic other and how modern flamencas of the early-mid-twentieth century fit into that
            category. Most of the chapter deals with Carmen Amaya’s success in the United States.
            Hayes discusses Amaya’s great skill, technique, perceived “wildness,” and her ability to
            break from traditional feminine imagery by wearing pants. Amaya conquers the world with
            a new exoticized image of the gypsy dancer as firecracker.</p>
        <p>The last chapter, “‘Somos Anti-Guapas’—Against Beauty in Contemporary Flamenco,” is
            comprised of theatrical critiques, interviews, and descriptions of performances by three
            of the most important flamenco artists of the past decade. Hayes discusses how women are
            breaking barriers and creating a newer image of the flamenca. Theatrical critiques
            illustrate the general acceptance or rejection of these new modes of interpretation. The
            chapter is summed up by describing the dancers as modern, innovative, and abstract,
            while simultaneously being upholders of an age-old tradition. While this chapter is
            extremely informative, this reviewer would have liked to have seen more of the book
            devoted to this contemporary subject matter.</p>
        <p>Overall the book is an informative contribution to the growing field of flamencology. The
            author offers a unique approach to the field of study by including contemporary
            documentary, fictional film, and live performance. Little work has been done previously
            to include these genres in the general history and discourse on flamenco. Even so,
            several items are worth mentioning. The book lacks a formal conclusion and instead sums
            everything up in the last two paragraphs of the final chapter. Given the extensive
            introductory chapter, a stronger conclusion is called for. Also missing is a glossary of
            Spanish and flamenco terminology that would prove helpful to those new to the topic.</p>
        <p>Hayes shows that she is well-equipped to research, interpret, and dissect flamenco
            histories from a multiplicity of vantage points. Given that most histories and
            narratives on flamenco are written by men, Hayes provides a fresh perspective on the
            future and continuance of the flamenco tradition and its women into the twenty-first
            century. The author joins the ranks of contemporary women flamenco scholars such as
            Loren Chuse and Ninochka Bennahaum in bringing new research to the forefront on a
            usually ignored piece of flamenco history.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 941 words • Review posted on April 27, 2011]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>