<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">39073</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Jeanmarie Rouhier-Willoughby - Review of Anna-Leena Siikala and Oleg Uliashev, Hidden Rituals and Public Performances: Traditions and Belonging among the Post-Soviet Khanty, Komi and Udmurts (Studia Fennica Folkloristica 19)</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Jeanmarie Rouhier-Willoughby</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>University of Kentucky</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2012</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Anna-Leena Siikala and Oleg Uliashev</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Hidden Rituals and Public Performances: Traditions and Belonging among the Post-Soviet Khanty, Komi and Udmurts (Studia Fennica Folkloristica 19)
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2011</year>
                <publisher-loc>Helsinki</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Finnish Literature Society</publisher-name>
                <page-range>365 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>978-952-222-307-4 (soft cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p><italic>Hidden Rituals and Public Performances</italic> is dedicated to the study of the
            religion, rites, and song traditions of three Siberian Finno-Ugric groups in the
            post-Soviet context. The book focuses on the intersection between the traditions of the
            many Finno-Ugric peoples in Russia as well as on the Russian and Tatar (or other Turkic)
            influences. The authors emphasize the long-standing cultural exchanges among these
            peoples and how this phenomenon has affected their beliefs, rites, and songs. They also
            address the changing nature of folk tradition as a tool to present minority identity in
            a multicultural country and in a globalizing world.</p>
        <p>The book is divided into four sections. Part One, Representations of the Russian
            Finno-Ugrians, deals with the history of the study of the Russian Finno-Ugric peoples by
            scholars from Finland and Hungary as well as by Russians from the nineteenth century to
            the post-Soviet period. This section takes issue with anthropological and sociological
            scholarship on the evolution of societies toward a post-traditional state. The authors
            critique Western approaches to traditional, local culture as a “static, closed system
            characterised by the epithets cold, repetitive, ritualistic, predetermined,
            differentiated and organised, in contrast to the hot, experimental, reflexive,
            undifferentiated or unorganised modern/post-modern West” (22). Rather, they hope to show
            that the folk practices of the Khanty, Komi and Udmurt have always been in dialogue with
            other ethnic traditions. As such, their societies and folk traditions have been
            constantly renegotiated on the basis of socio-political and cultural contexts. Building
            upon this premise, the authors turn to the question of how folkloristics can and must
            cope with globalizing forces to “examine complex processes of tradition and
            identity-formation in diffuse networks of diverse interconnections, of ideological,
            economic and power relations” (24). Of particular concern is how and why the Siberian
            Finno-Ugric peoples have chosen to present and adapt their folk practices (described as
            neo-tradition) to post-Soviet society.</p>
        <p>Part Two, The Khanty: Preserving and Performing Religious Traditions, examines the
            religious beliefs and rites of the Shuryshkary Khanty along the northern the Ob’ river
            in the Yamal-Nenets National Area of Russia. This section presents an overview of the
            socio-cultural organization of the northern Khanty with an emphasis on kinship and
            gender. The authors take issue with Western approaches to vernacular religion, arguing
            that ethnic religions such as this one cannot be perceived as closed systems, from the
            normative point of view of Western religious institutions, or understood only on an
            individual level, as Leonard Primiano has suggested. [1] They argue for a consideration
            of the complex ethnic cross-pollination among these peoples as well as for the
            importance of the social worlds of these religions. The authors examine relationships to
            protective spirits and deities, the secret holy spaces where they are propitiated and
            fed, the concept of the multiple human souls, and funerary and commemorative rituals.
            This section concludes with a study of the post-Soviet shamanistic revival. Both
            Christianization, beginning in the eighteenth century, and the official Soviet policy of
            atheism, forced religious practices underground. In the 1990s, after the fall of the
            USSR, public shamanic rites, connected both to religious holidays and to official,
            secular festivals, e.g., the 160th anniversary of the regional political center held on
            St. Elijah’s Day, reemerged. The authors assert that the public shamanic séances were
            chosen to represent the Khanty on the public stage to “reconcile differing, even
            contradictory interpretations of ritual by honouring the original Khanty culture as well
            as highlighting the importance of connections between ethnic history and ethnic values”
            (197). While this argument is compelling on its surface, the authors could offer a more
            nuanced analysis, particularly from the growing field of post-socialist studies, of the
            fascinating ethnographic data. Another weakness is the failure to mention the
            provocative parallels between some of the commemorative rites for the dead and those in
            the Russian Orthodox tradition. While the authors argue that much Christian belief has
            been abandoned, given the long-standing interaction between the Khanty and the Russians,
            a major focus of the work, this issue merits comment at least.</p>
        <p>Part Three, The Komi: Proliferating Singing Traditions, turns to the folk revival in the
            singing traditions in the Upper Vychegda region of the Komi Republic. This section
            focuses on the interaction of Russian and Komi song traditions since the latter’s
            Christianization in the fourteenth century. The authors present a convincing case for
            how Soviet intellectual views of folklore and the establishment of cultural clubs in the
            1930s led to the rise of female singing groups among the Komi. The singers in these
            local, regional, and in some cases, (semi-) professional, ensembles not only perform
            traditional women’s songs but also have adapted traditional men’s songs to their
            repertoires. Likewise, they have borrowed from the canon of official Soviet songs as
            well as from Russian and Komi popular and literary sources in their creation of this
            song tradition. Despite these sources, the authors demonstrate that the songs are
            characterized by regional variants, have been adapted to folk language, and are passed
            on orally. Of particular note is the coded use of adapted literary texts written by Komi
            poets officially banned during the Stalin era as a means to convey ethnic belonging and
            values in the face of the official governmental policy. The authors consider the entire
            range of festival performances, including pre-festival gatherings, practice sessions,
            and informal singing evenings, to demonstrate how these events should be classified as
            part of the folk tradition. They conclude that these singing groups have become the mark
            of Komi identity on the public stage.</p>
        <p>The one significant weakness in this section is that the authors do not provide clear
            guideposts for the reader. The theoretical basis for the approach to the material is
            outlined nearly fifty pages into the section, well after the actual analysis has begun.
            The discussion of examples is particularly hard to follow at times. In the analysis of
            songs and their relation to literary sources, for example, the original poem may be
            mentioned, but the authors may not provide the text; it is often unclear which variant
            of the songs under discussion is being presented because variants are not clearly
            labeled; in some cases, variants are discussed in detail, but yet another version is
            presented; or a translation of the Komi version is given, but not of the Russian
            source.</p>
        <p>Part Four, Comparisons and Observations, gives a brief overview of preservation of the
            Udmurt nature religion during the Soviet period and its post-Soviet public revival in
            the context of two iterations (1993 and 1996) in the national Gerber festival organized
            by the Udmurt Cultural Society. The discussion centers around the dilemma of conveying a
            unified Udmurt identity, minimizing the divide between Udmurt believers in Christianity
            or in the nature religion, as well as a consideration of the role intellectuals,
            political forces, and the media play in these festivals. The rest of the chapter
            contrasts how these representative subsets of three Finno-Ugric minorities use
            neo-traditional folklore to present their identities to each other, to their fellow
            citizens in Russia, and to the global populace.</p>
        <p>While occasionally in need of more thorough argumentation or improved organization and
            presentation of material, this book is a welcome addition to the literature in English
            on the Siberian minority peoples, if for the intriguing ethnographic data alone.</p>
        <p>Footnote</p>
        <p>[1] See Leonard Primiano, “Vernacular Religion and the Search for Method in Religious
            Life,” <italic>Western Folklore</italic> 54 (1995): 37-56.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 1227 words • Review posted on September 26, 2012]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>