<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">38913</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Gordon Brotherston - Review of Dennis Tedlock, 2000 Years of Mayan Literature</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Gordon Brotherston</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>University of Essex</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2013</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Dennis Tedlock</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>2000 Years of Mayan Literature
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2011</year>
                <publisher-loc>Berkeley</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>University of California Press</publisher-name>
                <page-range></page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>9780520232211 (hard cover), 9780520271371 (soft cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <p>As Dennis Tedlock remarks in his introduction to this work, it's not as if publications
            on its precise topic have ever been superabundant (though they certainly do exist). And
            he goes on to suggest reasons why this might have been the case. Among them is the sheer
            complexity of Maya hieroglyphic script, which only in the last half century or so has
            yielded protracted readings, thanks not least to recognition of the phonetic element
            embedded in it. Another is the degree to which the idea of literary intelligence has
            been displaced by linguistics and the urge to reduce and decipher, most often with
            little or no regard for larger context or genre. Perhaps most important of all with
            respect to “this most deeply American of literary traditions,” is the question of
            European colonization, and the ideology that accompanied the propagation of the Roman
            alphabet over much of the globe. As Tedlock forcefully puts it, “according to the story
            of progress, which is always teleological, the problem was not that the alphabet had
            somehow become flat and one-dimensional but that other writing systems had failed to
            evolve to a high enough level to rid themselves of nonphonetic signs.” This when the
            Mayans were writing their history long before any European set foot in America and when
            English had still to be fully born as a written language.</p>
        <p>The study itself falls into two parts, devoted respectively to the two scripts Maya
            literature is written in, indigenous hieroglyphs and imported Roman letters. Part One
            begins with some pretty workman-like observations on learning to read, the core of the
            writing system being the divinatory calendar shared throughout Mesoamerica. At this
            early stage we are also informed about the workings of syllabic signs and logographs in
            ways that help explain Maya hieroglyphs as a composite script whose beginnings are
            traced back to the late preclassic period (400 BC - 240 AD). In the seventeen chapters
            that make up the rest of Part One we are first taken in turn through texts from major
            cities of the Classic period (230-925 AD). The first is Maxam, later known as Naranjo,
            close to Guatemala's border with Belize, and is exemplary in being the source of two
            beautiful chocolate drinking vessels ingeniously designed by a scribe-painter who signs
            himself as “the skilled observer.” Next comes a consideration of stone stelas from
            eastern Copan and Quirigua, on the lowermost Motagua River. The chapters jointly
            entitled “Cormorant and her Three Sons” (5-7) center on the three temples housing carved
            stone tablets at the western city of Palenque. There follow Yaxchilan with its famed
            lintels, and central Calakmul, the source of pottery painted in the style of books. All
            these cities are located in the rainforest and prior to moving north to Coba and Chichen
            Itza in more arid Yucatan, Tedlock inserts two less geographically centered chapters (10
            and 11), touching respectively on the phenomena of glyphs that read as concrete poems,
            no less, and graffiti. This paves the way to the concluding remarks, at the end of this
            first part, on the pages of surviving Maya books, notably the astronomical knowledge
            (moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars) in the Dresden and other codices.</p>
        <p>In dealing with Maya literature written in the Roman alphabet Tedlock respects the phases
            of the European invasion and moves from the lowlands to the highlands. After the rich
            hieroglyphic heritage transcribed in part alphabetically in the books of Chilam Balam
            from an array of Yucatecan towns, chief among them Chumayel, Mani, Tizimin, and Kaua, we
            learn about the highland treasures of the Quiché, above all their superlative
                <italic>Popol Vuh</italic> and the verse drama <italic>Rabinal Achi</italic>, and
            the Kaqchikel, whose annals fall into years of 400 days. He also pays close attention to
            the little-known Kiché Codex which records astronomical phenomena in pre-alphabetic
            fashion as late as the early decades of the eighteenth century.</p>
        <p>The thirty-two chapters of Parts One and Two conclude in a brief epilogue that culminates
            in the advent of printed Maya texts and what is termed the Maya renaissance of the
            late-twentieth century. Well chosen and succinct notes accompany each part of the main
            text, which also includes helpful photographic and other illustrations.</p>
        <p>It will be hard not to recognize Tedlock's volume as a landmark contribution to the
            understanding of a millennial literature too often misconstrued or simply ignored in its
            own terms. Some may find it hard to adapt to his use of non-Yucatec terms for the twenty
            signs, his insistence on a spatial rather than a temporal understanding of the world-age
            creation story, legible elsewhere in Mesoamerican genesis (not least the <italic>Popol
                Vuh</italic> translation of his predecessor Munro Edmonson), and the occasional
            privileging of US over European scholarship, for example with regard to Maya signs for
            direction. As for the late-twentieth-century rebirth of Maya letters it's chastening to
            recall that it coincided with wholesale massacres of the Maya themselves, unmentioned
            here, as Rigoberta Menchú testified as one of their number, while for US collusion in
            them President Clinton on assuming office offered an unprecedented apology.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 842 words • Review posted on February 27, 2013]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>