<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">38402</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Pamela Dearinger - Review of David M. Krueger, Myths of the Rune Stone: Viking Martyrs and the Birthplace of America</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Pamela Dearinger</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff></aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2016</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>David M. Krueger</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Myths of the Rune Stone: Viking Martyrs and the Birthplace of America
                </source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2015</year>
                <publisher-loc>Minneapolis</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>University of Minnesota Press</publisher-name>
                <page-range>224 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>978-0-8122-9691-8 (hard cover), 978-0-8166-9696-3 (soft cover)</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <fig id="f0" orientation="portrait" position="anchor">
            <alt-text>Vikings, swords and arrows characters.</alt-text>
            <graphic xlink:href="Myths of the Rune Stone.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p>This book, a revision of the author's doctoral thesis, provides a fascinating insight
            into the motives of those who have promoted the story of a carved flat rock that came to
            be known as the Kensington Rune Stone. Supposedly unearthed by a Swedish-American farmer
            in the summer of 1898, the rock itself is about thirty-six inches long by fifteen inches
            wide, and weighs about two hundred pounds (17). Its inscription indicates that it was
            carved in commemoration of a tragedy that befell a group of Viking explorers in the year
            1362 (some members of the group died violently, presumably at the hands of the local
            skrælings, a derogatory term for the Native Americans). The “runic” inscriptions carved
            into the rock were almost immediately denounced as fake, and since then numerous
            authorities have determined the stone to be a hoax. Yet, despite all the evidence
            against it, the Kensington Rune Stone has continued to have its defenders. For a variety
            of reasons, the stone has been championed over the years by what might be considered a
            cult-like following. One of the first, and definitely one of the most fervent and
            tireless promoters of the stone, was a self-styled historian named Hjalmar Holand, who
            built an entire career around the promotion, defense, and continued embellishment of its
            story as an authentic article of Scandinavian-American history. Others followed in his
            footsteps, further building on the legend to meet their own agendas.</p>
        <p>More than just a history lesson about Scandinavian immigrants and the controversy
            surrounding Minnesota's own rune stone, Krueger's book unearths the motivations of those
            true believers who have been the most ardent advocates for the stone. The author
            portrays the rune stone as a kind of touchstone that has been used to remind the white
            population of their history in Minnesota, to legitimize their endeavors, and to
            strengthen their resolve in the face of adversity and perceived threats from outside
            influences. Communities are said to be imagined and traditions invented, and apparently
            history can be the product of inventive imaginations as well. This appears to be the
            case with the stories supporting the Kensington Rune Stone.</p>
        <p>The author explains how some characteristic mythologies associated with immigrant
            populations, which are aimed at legitimizing their presence in their new homelands, can
            be identified in relationship to the stone. The five chapters tell the saga of the stone
            in chronological order and the author makes a convincing case that a combination of
            immigrant myths and opportunism has created a civil religion centered on this
            controversial object. In the first chapter, he makes the case that belief in the
            Kensington Rune Stone exemplifies a “foundation myth” (18) because, if legitimate, this
            artifact would prove that Scandinavians had arrived well before Columbus, and therefore
            they had been the ones who actually “discovered” America. This is an example of “a long
            tradition of marginalized groups in U.S. history making the claim that their ancestors
            had traveled to North America prior to Columbus” (166). Such stories of discovery tend
            to downplay the fact that North America was already inhabited. Certainly there were
            Native Americans in Minnesota when the Vikings supposedly arrived there in 1362. They
            were apparently an unseen, but deadly, presence. While “homemaking myths” (18) may
            contribute to community histories and are used to create a sense of belonging for some,
            it seems they will inevitably exclude certain “others” who remain marginalized.</p>
        <p>Chapter 2 details how it came to be that the Vikings who allegedly carved the rune stone
            as a memorial to their fallen comrades were portrayed as white Scandinavian martyrs and
            as Christian martyrs. Krueger does not believe it is mere coincidence that the stone is
            dated 1362, exactly five hundred years before the Dakota War of 1862, the memory of
            which no doubt still haunted Scandinavian-Americans in 1898. The date seems to imply
            that skrælings had been a danger hundreds of years earlier and that things hadn't
            changed much over the course of time. Chapter three describes how economic factors and
            elitist criticism of small town life led people once again to turn to the Kensington
            Rune Stone to symbolize small town values as the bedrock of American culture. In chapter
            4, Krueger depicts how Catholics in the area, feeling themselves to be a marginalized
            group, co-opted the story of the rune stone as a means of increasing their social
            capital. In this scenario, the Vikings were not just Christian martyrs but Catholic
            martyrs. Catholic leaders even created a shrine to “Our Lady of the Runestone.”
            (Happily, the book contains numerous illustrations, as some things must be seen to be
            fully appreciated.) Chapter 5 deals with the Cold War and how, once again, the stone was
            used as a symbol of strength, faith, and determination.</p>
        <p>The desire for inclusion, justification of white settlement, and an appeal to belief in
            God and country (no doubt accompanied by a fascination for Vikings), all account in some
            measure for the continued interest in the Kensington Rune Stone. Krueger, who grew up in
            the area where the stone had its beginnings, has done extensive research and he makes
            well-crafted arguments about the nature of the appeal of this artifact that has been so
            widely discredited. The real story here, of course, is not the authenticity of the
            stone, but rather its enduring ability to inspire and to become whatever some particular
            group needs it to be at any given time. One might wish for a single concrete answer to
            explain its popularity, but ultimately the explanation seems to come down to a matter of
            faith. If people really want to believe in something, they will find a way to justify
            that belief. The recurring themes behind the myths can be identified and classified, but
            the influence of faith can't be denied. This book should be of interest to students of
            folklore, Scandinavian-American history, religion, or just human nature in general. It's
            an entertaining and informational read.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 986 words • Review posted on April 27, 2016]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>