<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">37049</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Jack Daly - Review of Emily Hilliard, Making Our Future: Visionary Folklore and Everyday Culture in Appalachia</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Jack Daly</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Penn State University Harrisburg</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>jjd6529@psu.edu</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023">
                <year>2023</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Emily Hilliard</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Making Our Future: Visionary Folklore and Everyday Culture in Appalachia</source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
                <publisher-loc>Chapel Hill</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>University of North Carolina Press</publisher-name>
                <page-range>312 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>1469671611</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <fig id="f37049" orientation="portrait" position="anchor">
            <alt-text>playful painting of a river running through the countryside</alt-text>
            <graphic xlink:href="81BeGU3yuOL._SY522_.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p>Emily Hilliard’s touching and insightful book, <italic>Making Our Future: Visionary
                Folklore &amp; Everyday Culture in Appalachia, </italic>draws from her experiences
            as the state folklorist of West Virginia to show how the folklore of this region is not
            lost in a dead past, but rather is constantly being created, reevaluated, and challenged
            through expressive forms. The title of her book reflects this ethos of creating a future
            out of the past, and that sense is found in a variety of sources documented in
            Hilliard’s fieldwork: through songwriters, foodways, creative writers, occupational
            folklore, and retrofuture visions of Appalachia in video games such as <italic>Fallout
                76</italic>. One of Hilliard’s collaborators, Elaine Purkey, echoed this sentiment
            in her song “One Day More,” saying “we’re fighting for our future, don’t you
            understand?” Hilliard routinely focuses on how West Virginia has been a locus of
            extraction and an “isolated cultural anachronism” (13) that has been exploited by
            industries. The focus of her work, then, is to show the creative ways that folklore is
            used to fight these narratives and imagine a new future. Throughout the book, Hilliard
            cites Henry Glassie’s definition of tradition as “the creation of the future out of the
            past,” noting that these traditions are “a moving target constantly churning” (209). </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>One of Hilliard’s main goals in writing this book is to employ a collaborative
            ethnographic methodology in her fieldwork. This methodology is defined, Hilliard tells
            us, by conducting open-ended interviews, through mutual dialogue throughout the
            fieldwork process, and by sharing drafts of her work throughout the writing process
            (xii). By incorporating collaborative ethnography, Hilliard was able to receive an
            expanded perspective on what she, or her collaborators, may be taking for granted.
            Hilliard reiterates that her role as a non-native West Virginian meant that she would
            ask questions or make observations about details that her collaborators might see as
            self-evident. This mix of emic and etic perspectives allowed for a richer fieldwork
            experience. At one point, Hilliard was referred to as a “flatland foreigner.” She notes,
            though, that it was not always her outsider status that created reluctance, but rather
            her role as an institutional representative in an area with a history of exploitation.
            This reasoning is why her collaborative approach was so important, and in the end,
            fruitful, because it worked to erase the hierarchical dichotomy between
            folklorist/participant and create a shared sense of importance in the fieldwork. She
            concludes that “the folklorist asks not to direct or control the conversation but to be
            invited into conversations that are already happening” (9). </p>
        <p/>
        <p>Hilliard’s journey through the Mountain State begins in Scotts Run, a small town in
            Monongalia County. This town is home to Scotts Run Museum and History Trail, which hosts
            a collection of regular guests at its coffee shop on Saturdays. She argues that these
            regulars use the museum and their interactions as vernacular counternarratives about the
            town. Scotts Run is intertwined with the legacy of Eleanor Roosevelt, who visited the
            town several times between 1933 and 1943. The impetus for Roosevelt’s visits to Scotts
            Run came from an Associated Press article saying the town was the worst place they’d
            ever seen. The coffee shop regulars, however, have created a network and a physical
            place where they are able to combat historical narratives and imagine new collective
            horizons through maintenance of the museum and shop, of their own relationships, and
            through creative forms such as a Scotts Run CD. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The songwriting of several individuals, Shirley Campbell, Ella Hanshaw, Cora Hairston,
            and Elaine Purkey, forms a powerful example of how Hilliard’s fieldwork documents the
            songs that folk musicians create to define and assert personal identity. During the
            course of her writing the book, Hanshaw, Purkey, and Campbell passed away, and their
            songs remain as a material remembrance of their lives. Campbell’s songs, written earlier
            in her life, document her observations on life in West Virginia, while also providing a
            creative outlet to deal with her interpersonal relationships. Hanshaw, a devout
            Pentacostal, used her songs as an expression of her faith. Hairston, an African American
            woman, writes songs in order to conceptualize her relationships and role in the world.
            Purkey crafted songs to be performed, as she did at the American Folklife Festival. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>By documenting foodways in the Swiss community of Helvetia, Hilliard shows how the
            culture of West Virginia is not monolithic and immutable, but rather pluralistic and
            dynamic. She details how the rosette, a crispy fried dough, exemplifies the complex
            cultural influences in the town at the yearly pre-Lenten festival of Fasnacht. This
            festival is itself an amalgamation of multiple Swiss festivities, which points to the
            celebration as an identity-building experience. Hilliard discovered that rosettes have a
            complex foodway lineage, reflecting the multifarious emigrations to central Appalachia. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The chapter on Breece D’J Pancake shows how his creative writing and ghost stories
            integrated folklore and folkways from his hometown of Milton, West Virginia. The town
            has creatively incorporated his legacy into the physical explorations of the town,
            ranging from his gravesite to his childhood home. By analyzing Pancake’s documentation
            of the town, a sense emerges of the changes the area has undergone. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Most people would probably not think about teachers’ strikes as emblematic of folk
            culture, but Hilliard shrewdly notes that their expressive culture took important
            creative form during the 2018-19 strike. This took many forms, such as memetic signs,
            references to popular culture, and creative chants. These teachers used their artistic
            communication to combat their marginalization. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Continuing the theme of foodways, Hilliard shows how the West Virginia hot dog is
            intertwined with the history of labor and issues across the spectrum of race, gender,
            and class. In this provocative chapter, the ways in which hot dogs vary throughout West
            Virginia’s geography reveal intricate insights into the state’s cultural heritage. By
            showing how this seemingly insignificant form takes on extremely important meanings,
            Hilliard draws scholars’ critical attention to that which we consider trivial. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Hilliard’s search for expressive culture in West Virginia continues in a chapter about
            independent professional wrestling. The history of the sport is contextualized within
            previous vernacular traditions in the region and has become a popular enterprise that
            has gained interest in recent years. Through her ethnography of the sport, Hilliard
            shows the complex roles that both the performers and the audience play. </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Perhaps the most interesting chapter in the book is her discussion of the popular game
                <italic>Fallout 76</italic> and its portrayal of the West Virginia landscape in its
            postapocalyptic rendering of the state. She shows how physical locales, such as Helvetia
            and the Mothman Museum in Point Pleasant, create a unique sense of West Virginian
            identity in the game. Hilliard argues that the expansion game, <italic>Wastelanders:
                Fallout 76,</italic> failed to achieve the same popularity in part because of its
            lack of distinct West Virginia-ness. The game itself was another way for a new future to
            be created, and to articulate a concrete narrative about the local culture and folklore. </p>
        <p><italic>Making Our Future </italic>is an overwhelming success as a book about public
            folklore and the documentation of expressive culture. The depth of Hilliard’s fieldwork
            demonstrates the level of immersion that she was able to achieve in her role as state
            folklorist. Beyond that, the book’s prose strikes the rare balance between academic and
            poetic. What results is an engaging read with valuable insights for both the public and
            academic sectors of folklore scholarship. Of course, editorial choices must be made when
            compiling a book-length project, and one wonders what rich details from the author’s
            fieldwork were necessarily excluded. I hope that more projects such as this one emerge
            not just from Hilliard, but from other public folklorists as well.</p>
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 1271 words • Review posted on December 11, 2023]</p>
    </body>
</article>
