<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">36991</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Kyle Fulford - Review of Kelley Tatro, Love and Rage: Autonomy in Mexico City's Punk Scene</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kyle Fulford</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Indiana University</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email>kpfulfor@iu.edu</email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023">
                <year>2023</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kelley Tatro</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Love and Rage: Autonomy in Mexico City's Punk Scene</source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
                <publisher-loc>Middletown</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Wesleyan University Press</publisher-name>
                <page-range>232 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>0819580945</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <fig id="f36991" orientation="portrait" position="anchor">
            <alt-text>Red grafitti-style art</alt-text>
            <graphic xlink:href="51akIUhAvIL._SY445_SX342_.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p>Music scholar Kelley Tatro provides an ethnographic account of Mexico City’s punk scene
            in <italic>Love and Rage: Autonomy in Mexico City's Punk Scene</italic>. Despite having musical
            training, Tatro does not perform or identify as a participant in the scene, establishing
            this positionality early and often. Instead, the author forgoes traditional ethnographic
            methodologies such as formal interviews in favor of a deeply immersive and often
            personal account of this frenetic, and sometimes fractious, musical collective.
                <italic>Love and Rage</italic> is a theoretically rich and detailed account of
            dissent and autonomy in the capital city.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>The capital city is one of the largest and most dangerous in the world. Tatro opens the
            monograph with a detailed description of street vending that serves as an introductory
            marker of <italic>autogestión</italic>. Roughly translated as “self-management,”
            autogestión is a key concept to which Tatro will return throughout the book. While
            autogestión loosely aligns with the familiar punk term “DIY” (do-it-yourself), it also
            evokes a worldview that engages the history of anarchism in Mexico and opposition to
            government oppression (35). To frame the theoretical orientation, Tatro borrows the
            concept of “sowing” and “seeds” from Mexican anarchist Ricardo Flores Magón and refers
            to the figure frequently.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Chapter 1, “Sowing,” builds on the short prologue to more fully flesh out the idea of
            autogestión and explain the motivations of political dissent in Mexico City. Kelley
            Tatro cites <italic>desconfianza</italic>, or a generalized mistrust of authority, as
            common among participants in the punk scene. Tatro explains that punk stereotypes are
            rooted in mistrust by insiders and outsiders alike, fears shaped by the Mexican
            government throughout the twentieth century in its positioning of rock music generally.
            The tumultuous 1970s (“lost decade”) saw the Mexican government crack down on youth
            culture and rock-music performance, which also led to a paucity of rock music recordings
            and media coverage. It is in this context that the burgeoning Mexico City punk scene
            latched on to anarchism in all its subjective forms, informed by a long history of
            revolutionary politics and activists such as Magón.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Tatro calls this distrust and pointed anger <italic>rabia</italic>, or rage, in chapter
            2. Careful to differentiate violence and self-defense, Tatro leans on anthropological
            and ethnomusicological work in affect theory to frame the chapter. Employing “affective
            overdrive” to describe the intensely loud and powerful experience of the slam, the
            author devotes a substantial section to the communal dance practice. Both a “dance of
            energy” and a “dance of friendship,” the slam is ultimately a “dance of solidarity,”
            Tatro argues. Physically demanding and fatiguing, the slam symbolizes trust and mutually
            dependent responsibility among punk-scene participants, who experience catharsis while
            keeping each other safe and free from injury. The author also details the influence and
            crossover of metal and hardcore in the punk scene while making these distinctions clear
            through a series of short vignettes called “seeds.” These inset asides are peppered
            throughout the book, often alongside twenty-five essential (and sometimes visceral)
            photographs by Yaz “Punk” Nuñez.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Rage gives way to dissent in chapter 3. As the intensity of rage is also pleasurable,
            protests become a “clear parallel in which feeling a motivating rage can be a stimulant
            to individual and collective enjoyment” (86). Tatro explains that underground rock in
            Mexico was a form of protest itself and recounts this history in the chapter. As schisms
            developed between punk and hardcore, reliance upon the anti-authoritarian basis of
            anarchism continued to inform dissent and rage in Mexico City’s punk scene. Tatro also
            makes careful distinctions between punk and emo, informed by scene participants through
            informal ethnographic accounts. The author acknowledges that research in the scene does
            not lend itself to formal interviews, and while I found direct quotation and a sense of
            the individual to be lacking, the writing nonetheless contributes to the author’s goal
            of “thick” description.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Descriptions of this “thick” event coalesce in chapter 4, “Love.” Devoting a sizable
            portion of the chapter to fanzines or ’zines, Tatro more importantly frames affective
            ties in Mexico City’s punk scene as a discourse of friendship and solidarity by
            “grouping the two concepts together under the idea of ‘love’” (120). The driving force
            of autogestión motivates a constellation of practices toward revolution, including work
            ethic, local pride, mutual aid, outreach and training, and community engagement.
            Protests and workshops are opportunities for sing-alongs, where well-known “classic”
            punk songs are vociferously performed in a visible and audible act of solidarity.
            Chapter 5, “Autonomy,” serves as an epilogue which positions love and rage as “an
            affective circuitry,” one that promotes autogestión while allowing a range of diverse
            practices and individual experiences. Tatro closes the book with a glimpse of Mexico
            City’s punk scene in a post-pandemic world, one in which many of its spaces and venues
            have since shuddered. But one informant reminds Tatro, and the reader, that punk began
            underground and to the underground it returns, “waiting to regenerate in whatever
            climate might meet their scrappy will to flourish in a post-pandemic world” (168). I
            found <italic>Love and Rage</italic> a fascinating account of punk history and lived
            experience in Mexico City punctuated by a message of hope, community, and ultimately,
            love. The author splendidly dispels stereotypes about punk-scene participants and does a
            good job to situate Mexico City’s position in the global punk scene. Dealing with a
            musical collective known for its material culture, the book favors a description of
            material ephemera (CDRs, bootleg DVDs, ‘zines) over access to them. While I missed a
            companion website or links to musical examples, the visceral photographs and vignettes
            seeded throughout <italic>Love and Rage</italic> help to sound out the voice of
            autogestión in Mexico City’s punk scene.</p>
        <p>--------</p>
        <p>[Review length: 933 words • Review posted on December 04, 2023]</p>
    </body>
</article>
