<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.1/JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article dtd-version="1.1" article-type="book-review"
    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>JFRR</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Folklore Research Reviews</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2832-8132</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>IU ScholarWorks</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">36734</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Charles Camp - Review of Kimberly Kattari, Psychobilly Subcultural Survival</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Charles Camp</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                    <aff>Maryland Institute College of Art</aff>
                    <address>
                        <email></email>
                    </address>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date publication-format="epub" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021">
                <year>2021</year>
            </pub-date>
            <product product-type="book">
                <person-group>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kimberly Kattari</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </person-group>
                <source>Psychobilly Subcultural Survival</source>
                <series></series>
                <year iso-8601-date="2021">2020</year>
                <publisher-loc>Philadelphia</publisher-loc>
                <publisher-name>Temple University Press</publisher-name>
                <page-range>258 pages</page-range>
                <price></price>
                <isbn>978-1-4399-1860-9</isbn>
            </product>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Reviewers retain copyright and grant JFRR the right of first publication with the review simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or redistribute reviews with an acknowledgment of the review's original authorship and initial publication JFRR.</copyright-statement>
            </permissions>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <fig id="f0" orientation="portrait" position="anchor">
            <alt-text>Cartoon representation of a pair of skeletons playing stringed instruments.</alt-text>
            <graphic xlink:href="Psychobilly Subcultural Survival.jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <p>First off, the musical subject of this interesting book is less likely to be familiar to
            folklorists than its cultural/subcultural approach. Kimberly Kattari’s work is a deeply
            academic analysis of a musical sub-genre hatched in England and the United States in the
            mid-to-late 1970s, now receding due to the growing (middle) age of its leading
            practitioners. A musical form derived from 1950s-style rockabilly and 1970s punk,
            psychobilly was—or is—an odd hybrid of the energetic American acoustic style brought to
            the fore by Elvis Presley and many other young southern players and the loud, defiant
            sound of British punk.</p>
        <p>Kattari’s book has less to do with the roots of psychobilly than with its metabolism as a
            subculture serving young musicians and an audience committed to stepping over these
            roots and creating something original, distanced from pop and other musical forms
            engineered by the recording industry for young audiences. Hence the author’s
            attentiveness to the distinctive hairstyles of psychobilly musicians and their favoring
            elaborately decorated upright bass fiddles over electric bass guitars. Details such as
            these are useful markings of psychobilly’s borrowings from the past and the musical
            community’s insistence upon creating a clear distinction not only from its musical roots
            but also from other forms of music in the air—the mark of a clearly defined subcultural
            community.</p>
        <p>How well Kattari defines this community is consequently a matter of some importance. As
            an ethnomusicologist specializing in popular music, Kattari’s effort is somewhat uneven.
            On the plus side, her incorporation of wide-ranging fieldwork provides breadth and
            solidity to the study, as does a broad employment of academic literature. The book is
            original in its organization, giving special attention to the place of women in the
            unique (largely male) world psychobilly creates for itself in the performances that
            inscribe its boundaries and recharge its membership.</p>
        <p>On the negative side, for a book about music, Kattari does not always display a sure hand
            in describing what she and her subjects are hearing. Psychobilly is not only a
            subcultural musical form; most readers will also find it somewhat obscure, if relying
            upon the author to create bridges between what she has heard and what we have heard.
            This is not an easy problem to solve, but it is a challenge with which
            ethnomusicologists are familiar. I own albums by a couple of the psychobilly bands to
            which Kattari refers, but I found this familiarity insufficient in drawing the
            comparisons necessary to follow several of the author’s key points. It might have been
            worth the time and trouble to package even a brief CD sampler of some important artists,
            or--if not--to expand the book’s skimpy discography with either brief descriptions of
            the thirty-two items the discography contains, or to select for description a few of the
            titles international companies like Bear Family has released. After all, Bear Family has
            released more than one hundred psychobilly titles. (Please note: this is not an
            endorsement of Bear Family.)</p>
        <p>Belaboring this point a little bit further, I noted above that Kattari establishes the
            importance of the psychobilly “look.” Yet only five of the book’s fourteen
            black-and-white photographs depict the appearance of psychobilly musicians or
            enthusiasts. It turns out that web merchant Etsy sells more than six hundred different
            items that their website identifies as “psychobilly.” I don’t take their word for it and
            would welcome Kattari’s guidance through Etsy’s maze of t-shirts and hair clips. (Note:
            I don’t endorse Etsy.) My point is that images are out there that might provide a useful
            supplement to this book. If Kattari did no more than identify sites where the music and
            apparel that are distinctive to psychobilly could be found, then the rather thin
            discography and illustrations would be considerably enhanced.</p>
        <p>All in all, the book under review is an original and worthy undertaking. No offense, but
            ethnomusicology seldom yields solid academic books about American subcultural music.
            Scholars interested in the subject should find in <italic>Psychobilly: Subcultural
                Survival</italic> a worthy effort to inspire and guide future efforts.</p>
        
        <p>--------</p>
        
        <p>[Review length: 664 words • Review posted on April 29, 2021]</p>
        
        
    </body>
</article>
