Thinking outside the Higher Education Box: Expanding upon the Economic and Community Development Roles of Urban Universities to Create a Win-win Situation

Main Article Content

Serena E. Alexander
Candi Clouse
Ziona Austrian

Abstract

This article sheds light on the bi-directional and self-reinforcing relationship between an urban public university and its neighboring communities. Through a case study of Cleveland State University (CSU), located in downtown Cleveland, we found that enormous mutual benefits can be expected from further integration of universities with their surrounding communities. By opening up its historically inward-looking campus to the neighborhood through better planning, using the existing fabric of downtown and teaming up with non-profit organizations and private investors to build and operate facilities, and enhancing the relevancy of education and research at the university to the community, CSU has played a significant community and economic development role in its neighborhood, city and region. Through this better collaboration, CSU has not only transformed its adjacent neighborhoods but also enhanced its mission of “engaged learning” and met its campus needs at a time of diminished public funding for higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Serena E. Alexander, Cleveland State University

Serena E. Alexander is a PhD candidate in Urban Studies at Cleveland State University and a Research Assistant at the Center for Economic Development.

Candi Clouse, Cleveland State University

Candi Clouse is a Program Manager at the Center for Economic Development and a PhD candidate in Urban Studies.

Ziona Austrian, Cleveland State University

Ziona Austrian, PhD is the Director of Center for Economic Development at the Cleveland State University.

References

Altbach, P. G. (2004). Higher education crosses borders: Can the United States remain the top destination for foreign students?. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36 (2).

Austrian, Z., & Norton, J. (2005). An overview of university real estate investment practices. In The university as urban developer (pp. 193-221). New York: M. E. Sharpe.

Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37, 1175-1187.

Branscomb, L.W. (1997). From technology politics to technology policy. Issues in Science and Technology, 13 (3).

Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Cleveland State University: A Brief History. (n.d.). Retrieved August 3, 2015, from http://www.clevelandmemory.org/csu/index.html

Desrochers, D., & Kirshstein, R. (2012). College spending in a turbulent decade: Findings from the Delta Cost Project. Retrieved August 4, 2015, from http://www.deltacostproject.org/sites/default/files/products/Delta-Cost-College-Spending-In-A-Turbulent-Decade.pdf

Klotsche, J. (1966). The urban university and the future of our cities. New York: Harper & Row.

Norton, J., & Austrian, Z. (2003). The role of colleges and universities in neighborhood real estate development: Based on the experience if five institutions. Urban Publications, 261. Retrieved July 7, 2015 from http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub/261/?utm_source=engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu%2Furban_facpub%2F261&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Perry, D., & Wiewel, W. (2005). From campus to city: The university as developer. In The university as urban developer (pp. 3-21). New York: M. E. Sharpe.

Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.