U.S. Economic Development Administration University Centers: Leveraging Federal Dollars Toward Best Practices

Main Article Content

G. Jason Jolley Behzad Taimur

Abstract

This paper reviews the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) University Center (UC) program, which encompasses 58 UCs across EDA’s six regions. A review of each UC’s activities reveals a diverse, and often specialized, expertise for UCs that reflects and integrates best practices in economic development. Older UCs more often focus on traditional economic development activities, such as technical assistance to organizations in their service region, while newer UCs reflect learning and best practices by focusing on entrepreneurship support, targeted commercialization of research, workforce development, and business counseling associated with Third Wave strategies. This work informs not only the scholarly community about the depth and diversity of the UC program, but also economic development practitioners who may work with UCs on economic development initiatives.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

G. Jason Jolley, Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs Ohio University

G. Jason Jolley is the MPA director and an assistant professor at the George V. Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs at Ohio University. His research has been published in Economic Development Quarterly, Business Strategy and the Environment, State and Local Government Review, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, & Financial Management, and other scholarly outlets. He received a Ph.D. in public administration from North Carolina State University.

Behzad Taimur, Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs Ohio University

Behzad Taimur graduated from Ohio University with a Master of Public Administration and a Master of Arts in Communication and Development Studies. His research interests include democratic governance, local government and socio-economic empowerment of distressed and marginalized communities.

References

Bagchi-Sen, S., & Smith, H. L. (2012). The Role of the University as an Agent of Regional Economic Development. Geography Compass, 6(7), 439-453. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00497.x

Bowen, W. M. (2007). Evolutionary Systems Theory, Universities, and Endogenous Regional Economic Development. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 20(2), 31-40. SRI International (2014). Making connections: Evaluation project to assess best practices in EDA's University Center Program. SRI International. U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration. Retrieved June 12, 2015

Clinton, W.J. and A. Gore, Jr., 1993, Technology for America's Economic Growth. A New Direction to Build Economic Growth (Executive Office of the President,
Washington, DC).

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.

Decker, R., Haltiwanger,Jo., Jarmin, R. & Miranda, J. (2014) The role of
entrepreneurship in us job creation and economic dynamism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 3-24. doi:10.1257/jep.28.3.3

Department of Commerce. (2013). Economic Development Administration fiscal year 2013 annual report. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved June 12, 2015

Fatzinger, G. B. (1979). Strengthening economic and small business development through university outreach efforts. Journal of Small Business Management, 17(3), 59-64.

Franklin, Nancy E. 2009. "The Need Is Now: University Engagement in Regional Economic Development." Journal of Higher Education Outreach And
Engagement 13, no. 4: 51-73. ERIC, EBSCOhost (accessed June 16, 2015).

Goldstein, H. and Drucker, J. (2006). The economic development impacts of universities on regions: do size and distance matter? Economic Development Quarterly. 20. 22–43.

Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction. Boston: Pearson, 2011.

Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. 1999. Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.

Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research policy, 25(6), 843-863.

Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2013). Knowledge spillovers, collective entrepreneurship, and economic growth: the role of universities. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 797-817. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9507-7

Mullin, J., Kotval, Z., & Cooper, J. (n.d). The university and local economic
development. Transylvanian Review Of Administrative Sciences, 126-136.

National Center on Education and the Economy. 2007. Tough choices or tough times. The Report of the New Commission on the Skills for the American Workforce. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

PACEC. (2010). The higher education knowledge exchange system in the United States. [Online]. Retrieved on 3 October 2010 from:
http://www.pacec.co.uk/documents/USKESystem-FullReport.pdf.).


Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114-116.

Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133.

Stephan, P. (2001). Educational implications of university–industry technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 199–205.


Thelin, John. 2004. A history of American higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.