An Evidence-Based Practice Review of EMLA Compared with ELA-Max for Pain Reduction in Pediatric IV Insertion
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Evidence Based Practice (EBP) team created the following PICO: "In pediatric patients getting an IV inserted, how does EMLA-cream compared to ELA-max affect pain reduction?" and selected the best research evidence to review. The team synthesized the evidence finding numerous similarities indicating no statistical significance in the suppression of pain between ELA-Max and EMLA-cream. While the team found no statistical significance, several noteworthy clinical differences were determined such as cost, time, clinical expertise, and patient preferences. These results are utilized to recommend organizational policies that promote the use of ELA-Max over EMLA-cream in intravenous insertion in pediatric populations.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
Section
Articles
IUSB Student Journal Copyright Agreement
☐ I declare that this submission is my original work, and that it does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright.
☐ I agree that that [the journal] may, without changing the content, translate the submission to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation.
☐ The Undergraduate Research Journal may keep copies of my submission, and to translate it to any medium for future reproduction and distribution. I understand that I have the right to request that my submission be removed from IUSB online sources at any time by emailing Stephen Finlay, IUSB ScholarWorks administrator, at scfinlay@iusb.edu. Once I have made the request, the item in question will be taken down immediately.