A COHERENT FOUNDATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the field of epistemology, two theories about how belie! justification occurs compete with each other for prominence. Foundationalism holds that there are a few basic b!!liefs upon which all subsequent knowledge and justification rest. Coherentism, on the other hand, claims this is impossible because all beliefs are justified only in context with other beliefs. This paper examines the basic characteristics of each theory, pointing out their respective strengths and weaknesses. It then seeks to create a plausible compromise between the theories by combining their respective strengths, enabling them to avoid common pitfalls.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
Section
Articles
IUSB Student Journal Copyright Agreement
☐ I declare that this submission is my original work, and that it does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright.
☐ I agree that that [the journal] may, without changing the content, translate the submission to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation.
☐ The Undergraduate Research Journal may keep copies of my submission, and to translate it to any medium for future reproduction and distribution. I understand that I have the right to request that my submission be removed from IUSB online sources at any time by emailing Stephen Finlay, IUSB ScholarWorks administrator, at scfinlay@iusb.edu. Once I have made the request, the item in question will be taken down immediately.