English obstruent perception: The content of the p-map and its relationship to natural class structure
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper reports a series of analyses of consonant identification data from Cutler, Weber, Smits, & Cooper (2004) and which empirically derive perceptual similarity to determine how it compares with feature-based models of phoneme similarity. A model in which minimal contrast structure is equivalent to perceptual structure provides a baseline 'null hypothesis'. This baseline model is compared to 1) an empirically fitted choice model that does not require intersegment similarity to bear any particular relation to feature structure, 2) models which add an explicit interaction between features, and 3) a set-theoretic model in which feature structure relates to perceptual structure via the number of each pair of segments’ shared and non-shared natural classes (the Natural Class Similarity Model, Frisch 1996). These model comparisons indicate that features interact pervasively in perception and that syllable position modulates these interactions. Pairs of similarity parameters were then compared across the listeners in order to identify contrasts that systematically differ from one another in similarity (which we define as a failure in Feature Equivalence), and contrasts that systematically differ in similarity depending on the segments in which the contrast appears (which we define as a failure in Feature Independence). Some of these identified differences could be accounted for by the set theoretic model, though this model systematically underestimates the distinctiveness of sibilants from other segments, does not account for the robustness of coda voicing contrasts, and overestimates the distinctiveness of dental fricatives. Finally, multidimensional scaling analyses indicate that the expected phonological contrast structure was present in the confusion patterns, despite the pervasive and robust presence of irregularities. The results robustly document a pattern of perceptual irregularity in the face of an overall pattern of featural contrast structure, and are discussed in terms of a number of factors involved in relating perceptual confusability to phonological systems.
Downloads
Article Details
The Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers (the "Publisher") and Author(s) agree as follows.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher's agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author's name in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials.
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in the Author's name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to notify IULCWP before publishing the Work elsewhere.
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author's original Work and that the Author has full power to enter into this Agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another; (c) contains no material that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory. Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ). This lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original IULCWP publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.