The Effect of Whiteness and Attempts to Preserve It on Political Division in the United States

Main Article Content

Therin Alrik Showalter


Beginning in the early 1990s, the American public has become increasingly politically polarized. As party affiliations have become more rigid, a racial trend has emerged in which white voters are much less likely than black voters to identify as liberal or align with the Democratic Party. Using voting data from the 2016 presidential election, this study correlates the prevalence of whiteness in certain counties with those counties’ support for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. This paper first details the increasing polarization over the past decades and the dramatic shift of white voters away from liberalism. It then analyzes the political affiliations of other identity groups (such as women, millennials, and college graduates) that are majority liberal and demonstrates that, when restricted to their white members, those groups all lean conservative.

The research results find a significant correlation between concentrated whiteness and a rejection of Hillary Clinton. The correlation on a national level is weaker, however, than the correlation of counties when separated regionally, suggesting that the relationship between whiteness and anti-liberalism depends heavily on a county’s degree of whiteness (or anti-liberalism) in its geographical context. While it is impossible to determine whether the race of white voters consciously motivates their voting behavior, the results suggest that American democracy is informed, in some way, by the racial identities of its participants.

These results should encourage the public to discuss the current political climate and its intensely divided electorate from a racial perspective. If the nation perceives political division as a problem to be solved, it is essential to understand what factors might be causing the division. To that end, the results of this study would be fundamental to the nation’s dialogue and should be considered when voters make their decision on Election Day. 


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Showalter, T. A. (2018). The Effect of Whiteness and Attempts to Preserve It on Political Division in the United States. IU Journal of Undergraduate Research, 4(1), 113–117.
Social Sciences
Author Biography

Therin Alrik Showalter, Indiana University

Therin Showalter is a senior in the Media School pursuing a B.A. in Media with minors in Playwriting and Creative Writing.


CNN. (2016, November 23). Exit polls. Retrieved from

Coates, T. (2017, October). The first white president. The Atlantic, 320(3), Retrieved from

Cohn, N., & Quealy, K. (2017, October 5). Nothing divides voters like owning a gun. The New York Times, Retrieved from

Collins, E. (2016, August 31). Poll: Clinton, Trump most unfavorable candidates ever. USA Today, Retrieved from

Devine, C., & Kopko, K. (2016, November 15). 5 things you need to know about how third-party candidates did in 2016. The Washington Post, Retrieved from

Edsall, T. (2017, October 5). How immigration foiled Hillary. The New York Times, Retrieved from

Newman, B. (2013, April). Acculturating contexts and Anglo opposition to immigration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 374-390.PBS. (2017, February 17). The latest election results from the Associated Press. Retrieved from

Pew Research Center. (2017, October 5). The partisan divide on political values grows even wider.

Pew Research Center. (2017, June 22). America’s complex relationship with guns.

Pew Research Center. (2016, September 13). The parties on the eve of the 2016 election: two coalitions, moving further apart.

Pew Research Center. (2015, April 7). A deep dive into party affiliation. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015, February 9). Census divisions and census regions. Retrieved from

U.S. Census Bureau. (2011, September). The white population: 2010.Wasserman, D. (2017, March 8). Purple America has all but disappeared. Retrieved from