Students’ Experiences of Learning Research Methods in an Interdisciplinary Project-Based Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teaching research methods is a challenging endeavor in any discipline. Approaches that offer beneficial and rewarding learning opportunities to students could improve their experiences of methods courses. This article describes research psychology students’ and urban planning students’ experiences of an approach that combines experiential and interdisciplinary scholarship in a university–science council research collaboration. Qualitative data from a focus group discussion and in-depth interviews generated three themes: Learning about research in the real world, experiences of multidisciplinary teamwork, and the professional and personal development of emerging researchers. These themes underline the importance of offering opportunities for learning about research in real-world settings, particularly when it is possible to involve external partners. We present implications of and recommendations for the implementation of the interdisciplinary project-based learning strategy for teaching research methods.
Article Details
Claire Wagner, University of Pretoria
Claire Wagner is a professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. Her research interests include social research methods pedagogy and environmental psychology.
Jacques du Toit, University of Pretoria
Jacques du Toit is an associate professor in the Department of Town and Regional Planning at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. His research interests include urban sustainability and the planning research-practice nexus.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
American Psychological Association. (2017). Standards of accreditation for health service psychology. https://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/about/policies/standards-of-accreditation.pdf
Baldwin, C., & Rosier, J. (2017). Growing future planners: A framework for integrating experiential learning into tertiary planning programs. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16634864
Balleisen, E. J., Howes, L., & Wibbels, E. (2023). The impact of applied project-based learning on under-graduate student development. Higher Education, 87(4), 1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01057-1
Brassler, M., & Dettmers, J. (2017). How to enhance interdisciplinary competence – Interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1686
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Chen, D. J., Huang, W. J., Wang Y. K., & Chang Y. (2022). Training for interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental planning: The shore-land project, Taiwan. Planning Practice & Research, 37(4), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.2023987
Costantino, T., Kellam, N., Cramond, B., & Crowder, I. (2010). An interdisciplinary design studio: How can art and engineering collaborate to increase students’ creativity? Art Education, 63(2), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2010.11519062
Foley, G. (2016). Reflections on interdisciplinarity and teaching chemical engineering on an interdisciplinary degree programme in biotechnology. Education for Chemical Engineers, 14, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2015.11.002
Goodman, R., Freestone, R., & Burton, P. (2022). Planning practice and academic research: Views from the parallel worlds. Planning Practice & Research, 37(4), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1378970
Harmer, N., & Stokes, A. (2016). “Choice may not necessarily be a good thing”: Student attitudes to autonomy in interdisciplinary project-based learning in GEES disciplines. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1174817
Koch, F. D., Dirsch-Weigand, A., Awolin, M., Pinkelman, R. J., & Hampe, M. J. (2017). Motivating first-year university students by interdisciplinary study projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1193126
Korobar, V. P., & Siljanoska, J. (2016). Challenges of teaching sustainable urbanism. Energy and Buildings, 114, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.049
Kueffer, C. E., Underwood, E., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Holderegger, R., Lehning, M., Pohl, C., Schirmer, M., Schwarzenbach, R., Stauffacher, M., Wuelser, G., & Edwards, P. (2012). Enabling effective problem-oriented research for sustainable development. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05045-170408
Lee, J. S., Blackwell, S., Drake, J., & Moran, K. A. (2014). Taking a leap of faith: Redefining teaching and learning in higher education through project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1426
Lewthwaite, S., & Nind, M. (2016). Teaching research methods in the social sciences: Expert perspectives on pedagogy and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1197882
Lyall, C., & Meagher, L. R. (2012). A masterclass in interdisciplinarity: Research into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers. Futures, 44(6), 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011
Matzembacher, D. E., Gonzales, R-L., & do Nascimento, L. P. M. (2019). From informing to practicing: Students’ engagement through practice-based learning methodology and community services. The International Journal of Management Education, 17, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.03.002
Oonk, C., Gulikers, J., & Mulder, M. (2019). Educating boundary crossing planners: Evidence for student learning in the multistakeholder regional learning environment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(3), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X177375989
Pan, G., Seow, P-S., & Koh, G. (2019). Examining learning transformation in project-based learning process. Journal of International Education in Business, 12(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-06-2018-0022
Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
Racine, N., Madigan, S., Cardinal, S., Hartwick, C., Leslie, M., Motz, M., & Pepler, D. (2022). Community-based research: Perspectives of psychology researchers and community partners. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 63(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000318
Rooij, R., & Frank, A. I. (2016). Educating spatial planners for the age of co-creation: The need to risk community, science and practice involvement in planning programmes and curricula. Planning Practice & Research, 31(5), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2016.1222120
Salama, A. M., & Patil, M. P. (2024). Unpacking transdisciplinary research scenarios in architecture and urbanism. Encyclopedia, 4, 352–378. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4010025
Stan, M. M., Dumitru, C., Dicu, M. M., Tudor, S. L., Langa, C., & Lazar, A. N. (2023). Modelling research competence in social and engineering sciences at master’s level programs: A scoping review. Sustainability, 15(1), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010574
Stoa, R., Chu, T. L., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2022). Potential potholes: Predicting challenges and learning outcomes in research methods in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 49(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979881
Suiter, S. V., Morgan, K. Y., & Thurber, A. (2023). The struggle animates the learning: Exploring student experiences with a community-engaged, project-based course on evaluation. Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement, 27(1), 5–18. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/3090/2780
Trisdiono, H., Siswandari, S., Suryani, N., & Joyoatmojo, S. (2019). Multidisciplinary integrated project-based learning to improve critical thinking skills and collaboration. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.1.2
Vogler, J. S., Thompson, P., Davis, D. W., Mayfield, B. E., Finley, P. M., & Yasseri, D. (2018). The hard work of soft skills: Augmenting the project-based learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork. Instructional Science, 46(3), 457–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9438-9
Wagner, C., & Du Toit, J. L. (2019). A qualitative study of interdisciplinary near-peer research mentoring in professional training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000213
Wagner, C., & Du Toit, J. L. (2020). Developing research skills for the future workplace through interdisciplinary near-peer mentoring. Africa Education Review, 17(1), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2018.1490155
Wagner, C., & Du Toit, J. (2023). Planning students’ experiences of interdisciplinary near-peer research mentoring. Journal of Planning Education & Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X231181036
Warr, M., & West, R. (2020). Bridging academic disciplines with interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28590