Exploring Students’ Problem Framing in Historical Inquiry: Towards A Framework for Research and Instruction
Main Article Content
Abstract
Problem framing is an essential yet under-explored aspect of problem-based historical inquiry. This study investigated how tenth-grade students in one AP US History class framed an ill-structured historical causal reasoning problem. Data included students’ written brainstorms, students’ responses to open-ended interview questions, and researcher-created causal diagrams. The analysis, grounded in both empirical data and existing literature on historiography and problem-solving, reveals three key dimensions for researching and teaching problem framing: (a) establishing the scale of the problem space, (b) identifying relevant agents and structures, and (c) establishing causal interactions. The findings underscore the importance of metacognition, particularly the need to weigh the affordances and constraints of alternative framings. The study concludes by offering relevant instructional interventions, such as explicitly teaching problem framing concepts, designing tasks to elicit problem framing, and using prompts and visualizations to help students reflect on their problem framing.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Bain, R. B. (2005). They thought the world was flat: Applying the principles of how people learn in teaching high school history. In M.S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 179–216). The National Academies Press.
Balint, P. J., Stewart, R. E., Desai, A., & Walters, L. C. (2011). Wicked environmental problems: Managing uncertainty and conflict. Island Press. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-047-7
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410610508
Blow, F. (2011). “Everything flows and nothing stays”: How students make sense of the historical concepts of change, continuity and development. Teaching History. 145, 47–55
Brien, J. (2013). The role of causation in history. History in the Making, 2(1), 72–81.
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Van Dyke, J., & Gabrys, G. (2000). The Sourcer’s Apprentice: A tool for document-supported history instruction. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 437–470). New York University Press.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2008). The effects of multimedia-supported problem-based inquiry on student engagement, empathy, and assumptions about history. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(1), 21–56. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1052
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2014). An instructional model to support problem-based historical inquiry: The Persistent Issues in History Network. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1409
Carlsnaes, W. (1992). The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600772
Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history? Palgrave Macmillan.
Carretero, M., Asensio, M., & Pozo, J. I. (1991). Cognitive development, historical time representation, and causal explanations in adolescence. In M. Carretero, M. Pope, R. J. Simons, & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (Vol. 3, pp. 27–48). Pergamon Press.
Carroll, J. E. (2018). Couching counterfactuals in knowledge when explaining the Salem Witch Trials with Year 13. Teaching History, 172, 18–29.
Chapman, A. (2003). Camels, diamonds and counterfactuals: A model for teaching causal reasoning. Teaching History, 112, 46–53.
Chapman, A. (2017). Causal explanation. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (2nd ed., pp. 130–143). Routledge.
Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 227–257). W. H. Freeman & Co.
Chi, M. T. H., Roscoe, R. D., Slotta, J. D., Roy, M., & Chase, C. C. (2012). Misconceived causal explanations for emergent processes. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x
Christian, D. (2005). Scales. In M. Hughes-Warrington (Ed.), Palgrave Advances in World Histories (pp. 64–89). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523401_4
Coffin, C. (2004). Learning to write history: The role of causality. Written Communication, 21(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088304265476
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. Continuum.
College Board. (2020). AP U.S. History: Course and exam description. College Board.
Collingwood, R. G. (1956). The idea of history. Oxford University Press.
den Heyer, K. (2012). Mapping the shadow: Bringing scholarship and teachers together to explore agency’s shape and content in social change. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(3), 292–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.705680
Digital Inquiry Group. (n.d.). Reading Like a Historian. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://inquirygroup.org/history-lessons
Eilam, B. (2012). System thinking and feeding relations: Learning with a live ecosystem model. Instructional Science, 40(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9175-4
Ertmer, P. A., Stepich, D. A., Flanagan, S., Kocaman-Karoglu, A., Reiner, C., Reyes, L., Santone, A. L., & Ushigusa, S. (2009). Impact of guidance on the problem-solving efforts of instructional design novices. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(4), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20041
Ertmer, P. A., Stepich, D. A., York, C. S., Stickman, A., Wu, X. L., Zurek, S., & Goktas, Y. (2008). How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20013
Eseryel, D. (2006). Expert conceptualizations of the domain of instructional design: An investigative study on the deep assessment methodology for complex problem-solving outcomes. [Doctoral Dissertation, Syracuse University]. SURFACE Open Access Institutional Repository. https://surface.syr.edu/idde_etd/5/
Evans, R. J. (1987). Death in Hamburg: Society and politics in the cholera years, 1830-1910. Clarendon Press.
Evans, R. J. (1997). In defense of history. Granta.
Fernandes, R., & Simon, H. A. (1999). A study of how individuals solve complex and ill-structured problems. Policy Sciences, 32(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004668303848
Fischer, D. H. (1970). Historians’ fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought. Harper Perennial.
Fitzgerald, J. C. (2014). An analysis of causal asyndetic constructions in United States history textbooks. Functional Linguistics, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-419X-1-5
Foster, S., Lee, P., & Asbhy, R. (2008). Usable Historical Pasts: A study of students’ frameworks of the past. ESRC.
Franchi, R., & Honold, A. (2023). Causation, the long and short of it: A year-long
instructional focus. Social Education, 87(4), 241-247.
Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford University Press.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press. (Original work published 1950)
Gottschalk, L. R. (1963). Understanding history: A primer of historical method. Knopf. (Original work published 1950)
Grohs, J. R., Kirk, G. R., Soledad, M. M., & Knight, D. B. (2018). Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.003
Grotzer, T. A., & Basca, B. B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students’ understanding? Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655891
Grotzer, T. A., Kamarainen, A. M., Tutwiler, M. S., Metcalf, S., & Dede, C. (2013). Learning to reason about ecosystems dynamics over time: The challenges of an event-based causal focus. BioScience, 63(4), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.9
Grotzer, T. A., Powell, M. M., M. Derbiszewska, K., Courter, C. J., Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S. J., & Dede, C. J. (2015). Turning transfer inside out: The affordances of virtual worlds and mobile devices in real world contexts for teaching about causality across time and distance in ecosystems. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9241-5
Guldi, J., & Armitage, D. (2014). The history manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
Halldén, O. (1997). Conceptual change and the learning of history. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89728-5
Halldén, O. (1998). Personalization in historical descriptions and explanations. Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00012-1
Henríquez, R., & Ruiz, M. (2014). Chilean students learn to think historically: Construction of historical causation through the use of evidence in writing. Linguistics and Education, 25, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2013.10.003
Hexter, J. H. (1971). The history primer. Basic Books.
Hicks, D., Doolittle, P., & Ewing, T. (2004). The SCIM-C strategy: Expert historians, historical inquiry, and multimedia. Social Education, 68(3), 221–225.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401
Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1604
Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(3), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.1027
Jacott, L., López-Manjón, A., & Carretero, M. (1998). Generating explanations in history. In M. Carretero & J. Voss (Eds.), International review of history education (Vol. 2, pp. 294–306). Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
Jonassen, D. H., & Ionas, I. G. (2008). Designing effective supports for causal reasoning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9021-6
Jones, D. K., & Read, S. J. (2005). Expert-novice differences in the understanding and explanation of complex political conflicts. Discourse Processes, 39(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3901_2
Jordan, R. C., Brooks, W. R., Hmelo-Silver, C., Eberbach, C., & Sinha, S. (2014). Balancing broad ideas with context: An evaluation of student accuracy in describing ecosystem processes after a system-level intervention. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.821080
Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272885
Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In M.S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 31–78). National Academies Press.
Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7-14. In P. N. Stearns, P. C. Seixas, & S. S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives. New York University Press.
Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2009). Is any explanation better than none?: Over-determined narratives, senseless agencies and one-way streets in students’ learning about cause and consequence in history. Teaching History, 137, 42–49.
Lloyd, C. (1993). The structures of history. Wiley.
Marx, K. (1926). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. International Publishers. (Original work published 1852)
Masterman, L., & Sharples, M. (2002). A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history. Computers & Education, 38, 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00072-0
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Sustainability Institute.
Minigan, A. P., Westbrook, S., Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining inquiry with students’ questions. Social Education, 81(5), 268-272.
Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
Monte‐Sano, C. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension and summary: Learning to read and write in history by focusing on evidence, perspective, and interpretation. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(2), 212–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00547.x
National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3)
framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/c3/c3-framework-for-social-studies-rev0617.pdf
Nersäter, A. (2018). Student understanding of causation in history in relation to specific subject matter: Causes behind the scramble for Africa. Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, Historical Cultures and History Education, 5(1), 76–89.
Neustadt, R. E., & May, E. R. (1988). Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision-makers. Free Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.
Petri, J., & Niedderer, H. (1998). A learning pathway in high‐school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1075–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200905
Pomper, P. (1996). Historians and individual agency. History and Theory, 35(3), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505451
Reed, S. K. (2016). The structure of ill-structured (and well-structured) problems revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 691–716.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9343-1
Reisman, A. (2009). Teaching the historical principle of contextual causation: A study of transfer in historical reading. In M. Martens, U. Hartmann, M. Sauer, & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Interpersonal understanding in historical context (pp. 43–60). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460910685_004
Reisman, A. (2012). The ‘document-based lesson’: Bringing disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.591436
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2011). Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Harvard Education Press.
Shreiner, T. L. (2014). Using historical knowledge to reason about contemporary political issues: An expert–novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 32(4), 313–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.948680
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications.
Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0037-8
Stoel, G. L., van Drie, J. P., & van Boxtel, C. A. M. (2017). The effects of explicit teaching of strategies, second-order concepts, and epistemological underpinnings on students’ ability to reason causally in history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000143
Svihla, V., & Reeve, R. (2016). Facilitating problem framing in project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1603
Taber, K. S. (2008). Exploring conceptual integration in student thinking: Evidence from a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1915–1943. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701589404
Tapp, E. J. (1952). Some aspects of causation in history. The Journal of Philosophy, 49(3), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2020913
Thomassen, A. O., & Stentoft, D. (2020). Educating students for a complex future: Why integrating a problem analysis in problem-based learning has something to offer. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i2.28804
US News & World Report (n.d.). U.S. News public high school rankings. Retrieved December 15th, 2021, from https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools
Voss, J. F., Carretero, M., Kennet, J., & Silfies, L. N. (1994). The collapse of the Soviet Union: A case study in causal reasoning. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 403-429). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., & Penner, B. C. (1983). Problem-solving skill in the social sciences. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 165–213). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60099-7
Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In The nature of expertise (pp. 261–285). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Voss, J. F., & Wiley, J. (2006). Expertise in history. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 569–584). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.033
Weber, M. (2012). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Courier Corporation. (Original work published 1905)
Wendell, J. (2018). Explaining the Third Reich: Swedish students’ causal reasoning about the Nazi seizure of power in Germany. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1398098
Wendell, J. (2020). Qualifying counterfactuals: Students’ use of counterfactuals for evaluating historical explanations. History Education Research Journal, 17(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.17.1.05
Wieseman, K. C., & Cadwell, D. (2005). Local history and problem-based learning. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 18(1), 11–14.
Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H., & Wilensky, U. J. (2015). Patterns, probabilities, and people: Making sense of quantitative change in complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 204–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.976647
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028003495
Woodcock, J. (2005). Does the linguistic release the conceptual? Helping Year 10 to improve their causal reasoning. Teaching History, 119, 5–14.
Yetiv, S. (2011). History, international relations, and integrated approaches: Thinking about greater interdisciplinarity. International Studies Perspectives, 12(2), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00422.x
Yoon, S. A. (2008). An evolutionary approach to harnessing complex systems thinking in the science and technology classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601101672
Zydney, J. M. (2008). Cognitive tools for scaffolding students defining an ill-structured problem. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(4), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.38.4.a