Foregrounding Design Thinking In Project-Based Learning amid the Transition to the New Normal
Main Article Content
Abstract
Incorporating design thinking in project-based learning (PBL) can generate a new praxis to epitomise an ecology of active-learner approach and embrace the authenticity of collaborative problem-based learning. Design-oriented disciplines in higher education are expanding their teaching and research objectives to prepare future designers to confront the increasingly complex problems arising in the new normal. This paper discusses the learning outcomes of two joint collaborative PBL projects by higher education institutes in Hong Kong and Australia to explore the application of the theoretical structure of design thinking to multidisciplinary design projects where students partner with community stakeholders and professionals to construct new social innovation. The paper explains how empathic design can encourage transdisciplinary student engagement, enhance learners’ motivation and generate a sustainable impact on society.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Almqvist, F. (2017). The fuzzy front-end and the forgotten back-end: User involvement in later development phases. The Design Journal, 20(Suppl. 1), S2524–S2533. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352765
Al-Samarraie, H., & Hurmuzan, S. (2018). A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002.
Bamford, D., Karjalainen, K., & Jenavs, E. (2012). An evaluation of problem-based assessment in teaching operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(12), 1493–1514.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (Vol. 1). Springer Publishing Company.
Bennett, E. E., & McWhorter, R. R. (2019). Social movement learning and social innovation: Empathy, agency, and the design of solutions to unmet social needs. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(2), 224–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319827939
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 1–18. https://doi.org /10.1007/BF00138871
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Bilda, Z., & Demirkan, H. (2003). An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Design Studies, 24(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00032-7.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Branco, R., Quental, J., & Ribeiro, Ó. (2015). Getting closer, empathising and understanding: Setting the stage for a co-design project with people with dementia. Interaction Design and Architecture, 26, 114–113.
Brassler, M., & Dettmers, J. (2017). How to enhance interdisciplinary competence—interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of problem-based Learning, 11(2).
Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. In W. Brenner & F. Uebernickel (Eds.), Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice (pp. 3–21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3_1
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (20192010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056
Carriger, M. S. (2015). Problem-based learning and management development–Empirical and theoretical considerations. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 249–259.
Cassim, F. (2013). Hands on, hearts n, minds on: Design thinking within an education context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01752.x
Chin, D. B., Blair, K. P., Wolf, R. C., Conlin, L. D., Cutumisu, M., Pfaffman, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2019). Educating and measuring choice: A test of the transfer of design thinking in problem solving and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(3), 337-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1570933
Choi, K. Y., Yu, W. Y., Lam, C. H. I., Li, Z. C., Chin, M. P., Lakshmanan, Y., Wong, F. S. Y., Do, C. W., Lee, P. H., & Chan, H. H. L. (2017). Childhood exposure to constricted living space: A possible environmental threat for myopia development. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 37(5), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12397
Cockton, G. (2009). Getting there: Six meta-principles and interaction design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2223–2232). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519041
Collins, J. A., & Chiaramonte, M. W. (2017). Project-based learning and design thinking: Fomenting agility and innovation in government. 2017 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2017.8013938
Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, 26(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005
Cummings, C., & Yur-Austin, J. (2022). Design thinking and community impact: A case study of project-based learning in an MBA capstone course. Journal of Education for Business, 97(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1887795
Daniel, A. D. (2016). Fostering an entrepreneurial mindset by using a design thinking approach in entrepreneurship education. Industry and Higher Education, 30(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422216653195
Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Kowalske, K. (2016). Transforming pedagogy: Changing perspectives from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), 1.
Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design issues, 22(3), 4-17.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Downing, K., Ning, F., & Shin, K. (2011). Impact of problem-based learning on student experience and meta-cognitive development. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal, 5(1), 55–69.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
Escalante, M. A. L., Tsekleves, E., Bingley, A., & Gradinar, A. (2017). ‘Ageing Playfully’: A story of forgetting and remembering. Design for Health, 1(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2017.1295529
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152103796
Gerber, E., & Carroll, M. (2012). The psychological experience of prototyping. Design Studies, 33(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.005
Glen, R., Suciu, C., Baughn, C. C., & Anson, R. (2015). Teaching design thinking in business schools. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.05.001
Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (2016). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. In Taking design thinking to school (pp. 21-37). Routledge.
Gottlieb, M., Wagner, E., Wagner, A., & Chan, T. (2017). Applying design thinking principles to curricular development in medical education. AEM Education and Training, 1(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10003
Harker, L. (2006). Chance of a lifetime: The impact of bad housing on children’s lives. Shelter. ISBN 1 903595 64 9.
Hendriks, N., Truyen, F., & Duval, E. (2013). Designing with dementia: Guidelines for participatory design together with persons with dementia. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013 (pp. 649–666). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_46
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16, 235-266.
Ho, K. Y., Li, W. H. C., Chung, J. O. K., Lam, K. K. W., Chan, S. S. C., & Xia, W. (2016). Factors contributing to the psychological well-being for Hong Kong Chinese children from low-income families: A qualitative study. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 10(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-016-0088-0
Hsieh, C., & Knight, L. (2008). Problem-based learning for engineering students: an evidence-based comparative study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 25–e30.
Iwaoka, W. T., Li, Y., & Rhee, W. Y. (2010). Measuring gains in critical thinking in food science and human nutrition courses: The Cornell critical thinking test, problem-based learning activities, and student journal entries. Journal of Food Science Education, 9(3), 68–75.
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023.
Kelley, K., Fowlin, J., Tawfik, A., & Anderson, M. (2019). The role of using formative assessments in problem-based learning: A health sciences education perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1814
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1921). Dangers and difficulties of the project method and how to overcome them—a symposium. Teachers college record, 22(4), 1-6.
Klein, J. T. (2006). Afterword: the emergent literature on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research evaluation. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 75-80.
Kleinsmann, M., Valkenburg, R., & Sluijs, J. (2017). Capturing the value of design thinking in different innovation practices. International Journal of Design, 11(2), 17.25-40. http://ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2771/780
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning (pp. 317-34). na.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34–37.
Leung, K. M., & Yiu, C. Y. (2019). Rent determinants of sub-divided units in Hong Kong. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(1), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-018-9607-4
Liauw, L. (2001). Elderly care residential typologies: Comparative case studies between care residential typologies: Comparative case studies between Hong Kong & international facilities and industry trends [Presentation]. Elderly Commission: The 26th Meeting, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Lindsay, S., Brittain, K., Jackson, D., Ladha, C., Ladha, K., & Olivier, P. (2012). Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 521–530). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207749.
Mansilla, V. B. (2010). Learning to synthesize: The development of interdisciplinary understanding. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, 288-306.
Manzini, E. (2011). Design schools as agents of (sustainable) change: A design labs network for an open design program. In E. Bohemia, B. Borja de Mozota, & L. Collina, Researching Design Education - 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers (pp. 9-16). Cumulus Association and DRS.
Manzini, E. (2013). Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Design Issues, 30(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00248
Margolin, V., & Margolin, S. (2002). A “social model” of design: Issues of practice and research. Design Issues, 18(4), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793602320827406
Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why problem-based learning works: Theoretical foundation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 221–238.
Matthews, E. (2005). Dementia and the identity of the person. In J. Hughes, S. Louw, & S. R. Sabat (Eds.), Dementia: Mind, Meaning, and the Person (pp. 163–177). Oxford. University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198566151.003.0010
McDonagh, D., 2006. Empathetic design: emerging design research methodologies [Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University]. Loughborough University’s Institutional Repository.
McLaughlan, R., Pert, A., & Lodge, J. M. (2021). Productive uncertainty: The pedagogical benefits of co‐creating research in the design studio. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12344
McLaughlin, J. E., Wolcott, M. D., Hubbard, D., Umstead, K., & Rider, T. R. (2019). A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8
Melles, G., de Vere, I., & Misic, V. (2011). Socially responsible design: Thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design. CoDesign, 7(3/4), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630473
Melsop, S. (2010). Community design matters: A new model of learning. Design Principles & Practice: An International Journal, 4(6), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v04i06/38000
Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
Mitchell, J. E., Canavan, B., & Smith, J. (2010). Problem-based learning in communication systems: student perceptions and achievement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(4), 587–594.
Mitchell, V., Ross, T., May, A., Sims, R., & Parker, C. (2016). Empirical investigation of the impact of using co-design methods when generating proposals for sustainable travel solutions. CoDesign, 12(4), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1091894
Mulder, I., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Rethinking design: A critical perspective to embrace societal challenges. In G. Kossoff & R. Potts (Eds.), Can Design Catalyse the Great Transition: Papers from the Transition Design Symposium 2016 (pp. 16–24). Carnegie Mellon University.
Muratovski, G. (2011). In pursuit of new knowledge: The need for a shift from a multidisciplinary to a transdisciplinary model of doctoral design education and research. Proceedings of the 2011 Doctoral Education in Design. Hong Kong Polytechnic University. https://www.academia.edu/19846122/In_Pursuit_of_New_Knowledge_ Conference
Newman, D. (2010). The process of design squiggle. The Design Squiggle. http://thedesignsquiggle.com.
Papanek, V., & Lazarus, E. L. (2005). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change Ed. 2. Academy Chicago Publishers
Parmar, A. J. (2014). Bridging gaps in engineering education: Design thinking a critical factor for project based learning. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044081
Peters, D., Loke, L., & Ahmadpour, N. (2021). Toolkits, cards and games – A review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation. CoDesign, 17(4), 410–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444
Ranscombe, C., Zhang, W., Eisenbart, B., & Kuys, B. (2021). Which visualisation tools and why? Evaluating perceptions of student and practicing designers toward digital sketching. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26(3), 261–275.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rodgers, P. A. (2018). Co-designing with people living with dementia. CoDesign, 14(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1282527
Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21.
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In. A. Walker, H. Leary, C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.) Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp.5-15). Purdue University Press.
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428296
Smeenk, W., Sturm, J., & Eggen, B. (2018). Empathetic handover: How would you feel? Handing over dementia experiences and feelings in empathetic co-design. CoDesign, 14(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1301960
Souleles, N. (2017). Design for social change and design education: Social challenges versus teacher-centred pedagogies. The Design Journal, 20(Suppl. 1), S927–S936. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353037
Span, M., Hettinga, M., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Eefsting, J., & Smits, C. (2013). Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, 12(2), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2013.01.002
Stanley, T., & Marsden, S. (2012). Problem-based learning: Does accounting education need it? Journal of Accounting Education, 30, 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accedu.2012.08.005
Svihla, V. (2017). Design thinking and agile design. In R. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. EdTech Books.
Tekmen-Araci, Y., & Kuys, B. (2019). The impact of excessive focus on performance during engineering design process on creativity. International Journal of Engineering Education. 35(6), 1618-1629.
Tekmen-Araci, Y., & Kuys, B. (2022). Ameliorating creativity in engineering education: educator perspective. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 8(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00040_1
Thompson, C., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., Withall, A., & Brodaty, H. (2010). Prospective memory function in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(2), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709991354
Torp, L. and Sage, S. (2002) Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education. 2nd Edition, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
Tiwari, A., Lai, P., So, M., & Yuen, K. (2006). A comparison of the effects of problem‐based learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking. Medical Education, 40(6), 547–554.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design thinking as an effective toolkit for innovation. In K. Huizingh, S. Conn, M. Torkkeli, & I. Bitran (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference (pp.1–20). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). https://www.proquest.com/docview/1368553865/abstract/4900F585E3B04333PQ/1
Tu, J.-C., Liu, L.-X., & Wu, K.-Y. (2018). Study on the learning effectiveness of Stanford design thinking in integrated design education. Sustainability, 10(8), 2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082649
van Rijn, H., van Hoof, J., & Stappers, P. J. (2010). Designing leisure products for people with dementia: Developing “the Chitchatters” game. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 25(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317509333039
Wahl, D. C., & Baxter, S. (2008). The designer’s role in facilitating sustainable solutions. Design Issues, 24(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.2.72
Wang, T. (2010). A new paradigm for design studio education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01647.x
Williams, A. (2009). User-centered design, activity-centered design, and goal-directed design: A review of three methods for designing web applications. Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on design of communication (pp. 1-8). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621995.1621997.