Problem-Based Learning as a Model for the Interior Design Classroom: Bridging the Skills Divide Between Academia and Practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
The addition of problem-based learning (PBL) pedagogy to studio-based learning (SBL) environments may help bridge the divide between traditional design education and initial postgraduate jobs. This paper demonstrates how one instructor adapted a PBL model to the interior design studio, including planning, execution, and evaluation. The relationship between PBL and SBL is explored. Two realistic design problems were created for use by interior design students who participated in PBL sessions. All of the groups adequately answered the client’s design programmatic needs. Students learned to perform as team members, including how to collaborate and compromise while working toward an effective design product. The evaluation process was the most challenging component for students. The skills fostered by PBL would be valuable in the workplace.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Anderson, L. (2014, June). NCARB supports faster path to licensure. Architectural Record News. Retrieved from http://archrecord.construction.com/news/2014/06/140605-NCARB-Supports-Faster-Path-to-Licensure.asp
Barrows, H. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Barrows, H. S. (1994). Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1998). The challenge of problem-based learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
Boyer, E. L., & Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building community: A new future for architecture education and practice. A special report. Ewing, NJ: California Princeton Fulfillment Services.
Burroughs, S., Brocato, K., & Franz, D. (2009). Problem based and studio based learning: Approaches to promoting reform thinking among teacher candidates. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 19(3), 1–14.
Cennamo, K., Brandt, C., Scott, B., McGrath, M., Reimer, Y., & Vernon, M., (2011). Managing the complexity of design problems through studio-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 12–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1253
Cowdroy, R. M., & Maitland, B. (1994). Integration, assessment and PBL. Reflections on PBL, 45–66.
Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. Dutton, T. A. (1987). Design and studio pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(1), 16–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
Ehrenberg, R. G. (2000). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much, with a new preface. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fisher, T. (2000). In the scheme of things: Alternative thinking on the practice of architecture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Gutman, R. (2010). Architecture from the outside in. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisci- plinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004
Kostof, S. (1977). The architect: Chapters in the history of the profession. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Ledewitz, S. (1985). Models of design in studio teaching. Journal of Architectural Education, 38(2), 2–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1985.10758354
Lee, R., & Kwan, C. (1997). The use of problem-based learning in medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 1(2), 149–157.
Lewis, R. K. (1998). Architect? A candid guide to the profession. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nabih, H. E. (2010). Process-based learning: Towards theoretical and lecture based coursework in studio style. ArchNet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2/3).
Nicol, D., & Piling, S. (2000). Architectural education and the profession. In D. Nicol & S. Piling (Eds.), Changing Architectural Education. London, UK: E & F Spon.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
Tombesi, P., Dave, B., & Scriver, P. (2003). Routine production or symbolic analysis? India and the globalization of architectural services. The Journal of Architecture, 8(1), 63–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1380236032000068479
Ward, A. (1990). Ideology, culture and the design studio. Design Studies, 11(1), 10–16.
West, R. E., Williams, G. S., & Williams, D. D. (2013). Improving problem-based learning in creative communities through effective group evaluation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 102–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1394
Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.