Conexiones: Fostering Socioscientific Inquiry in Graduate Teacher Preparation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Socioscientific Inquiry (SSI) represents one approach designed to target interest and knowledge in science. In this context, students consider scientific issues that have social implications and require a range of trade-offs, concepts, and considerations in order to arrive at informed conclusions (Sadler, 2004). However, inquiry tasks in general and SSI projects in particular are not widely adopted in K-12 settings, despite strong beliefs among teachers that these types of activities are valuable (Marshall, Horton, Igo, & Switzer, 2009). We suggest Collaborative Action Research may provide an important platform for enabling teachers to experience success through systematic investigations of their practice supported by peer interaction and collaboration (Capobianco & Feldman, 2006). In our investigation, we sought to understand the learning experiences of teachers within redesigned graduate-level courses aimed at preparing teachers to implement SSI approaches in the classroom. Data were collected from course participants to capture changes in scientific content knowledge, perceptions of SSI instruction, and strengths as well as recommendations of the experience. Results suggest that teachers can gain both content knowledge and pedagogical capacity in SSI methods.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science Pedagogical Content Knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 523–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9109-4
Bleicher, R. E. (2006). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 165–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9016-5
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school committee on developments in the science of learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2014). An instructional model to support problem-based historical inquiry: The Persistent Issues in History Network. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 39–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1409
Capobianco, B. M., & Feldman, A. (2006). Promoting quality for teacher action research: Lessons learned from science teachers’ action research. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 497–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650790600975668
Capobianco, B. M., & Joyal, H. (2008). Action Research meets engineering design: Practical strategies for incorporating professional development experiences in the classroom. Science and Children, 45(8), 22–26.
Capobianco, B. M., Lincoln, S., Canuel-Browne, D., & Trimarchi, R. (2006). Examining the experience of three generations of teacher researchers through collaborative science teachers’ inquiry. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 61–78.
Dolan, T. J., Nichols, B. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Using socioscientific issues in primary classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03174719
Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Sherwood, R. D., & Schlegel, W. M. (2013) Students’ participation in an interdisciplinary, socioscientific issues based undergraduate human biology major and their understanding of scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 43, 1051–1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9298-x
Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013) Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues: A large scale and in depth study. Research in Science Education, 43, 599–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9279-5
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (ed)., Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed). New York: MacMillan.
France, B., Mora, H. A., & Bay, J. L. (2012). Changing perspectives: Exploring a pedagogy to examine other perspectives about stem cell research. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 803–824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.630427
Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science and Education, 17, 829–854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9080-z
Gardner, G., & Jones, G. (2012). Perceptions and practices: Biology graduate teaching assistants’ framing of a controversial socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1031–1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500691003743244
Griffith, G., & Scharmann, L. (2008). Initial impacts of No Child Left Behind on elementary science education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 35–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03174707
Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173790
James, L. E., Laatsch, S., Boss Bossé, M. J., Rider, R., Lee, T., & Anderson, C. J. (2006). Science center partnership: Outreach to students and teachers. The Rural Educator, 28, 33–38.
Kara, Y. (2012). Pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions on the instruction of socio-scientific issues in the curriculum. European Journal of Teacher Education 35(1), 111–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633999
Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010) Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690902894512
Kolstø, S. D. (2001) Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
Krall, R., Lott K., & Wymer, C. (2009). Inservice elementary and middle school teachers’ conceptions of photosynthesis and respiration. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 41–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9117-4
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfled, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 483–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461779
Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009) Science Teachers’ Inspiration for Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 931–960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690801898903
Lynd-Balta, E., Erklenz-Watts, M., Freeman, C., & Westbay, T. D. (2006). Professional development using an interdisciplinary learning circle: Linking pedagogical theory to practice. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(4), 18–24.
Marin-Dunlop, C. (2006). Science learning environments and action research. Science Scope, 30(1), 44–47.
Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K–12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 575–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7
Matkins, J. J., & Bell, R. L. (2007). Awakening the scien- tist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 137–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9033-4
Merriam, S. B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study: Applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Mills, G. E. (2006) Action Research: A guide for the teacher researcher (3rd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2011 (NCES 2012-465). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Diane Publishing Company: Darby, PA. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Rentner, D. S., Scott, C., Kober, N., Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., Joftus, S., & Zabala, D. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, D.C.: Center on Education Policy. http://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=301
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513–536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science class- rooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Re- search in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353–376. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/tea.20142
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Re- search in Science Education, 37, 371–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 112–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
Saunders, K.J., & Rennie, L. J. (2011). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43, 253–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
Saye, J., Kohlmeier, J., Brush, T., Howell, J., & Maddox, L. (2009-2010). Assessing the effects of a teacher education program on pre-service secondary social studies teachers’ instructional decision-making. The International Journal of Social Education, 24(2), 35–76.
Shulman (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1387–1410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690601068095
Valanides, N., Nicolaidou, A., & Eilks, I. (2003). Twelfth grade students’ understanding of oxidation and combustion: Using action research to improve teachers’ practical knowledge and teaching practice. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21, 159–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0263514032000127211
Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2007). Preservice elementary teachers’ beliefs about science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 183–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9084-1
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Scoioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684