Beyond Beliefs: Teachers Adapting Problem-based Learning to Preexisting Systems of Practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
Problem-based learning (PBL) is a constructivist method of instruction aligned with the science educational reform movement to increase scientific literacy for all Americans. As such, PBL instruction is an increasingly popular topic for professional development workshops offered to teachers in secondary learning environments. This research presents a case study of four teachers’ alignment of classroom practice with constructivist principles after participating in a one-week PBL workshop. Teachers assimilated PBL instruction into their current system of teaching; therefore, despite congruent beliefs, those teachers without a constructivist system of practice taught the PBL method with less alignment to constructivist principles. This discrepancy between beliefs and practice could be addressed by helping PBL workshop participants contemplate how components of PBL encourage reform-based constructivist practices and by assisting teachers with modifying preexisting routines to better assimilate PBL instruction.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers’ opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 18-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4
Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52-81.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1991). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2003). Challenges of standards-based reform: The example of California’s science content standards and textbook adoption process. Science Education, 87, 378-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.10064
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brown, D. F. (2005). The significance of congruent communication in effective classroom management. The Clearing House, 79(1), 12-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.79.1.12-15
Carroll, T. M. (1999). Developing partnerships: Teacher beliefs and practices and the STS classroom. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual international conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp.331-338). Greenville, NC: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 431626)
Chiappetta, E. L. and Koballa Jr., T. R. (2005). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Czerniak, C. M. & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4), 247-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00058659
Donnelly, L. A. & Sadler, T. D. (2009). High school science teachers’ views of standards and accountability. Science Education, 93(6), 1050-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20347
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K-12 teachers. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 40- 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005
Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3
Glatthorn, A. A. & Craft-Tripp, M. (2000). Standards-based learning for students with disabilities. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Hagen, J. B. (1996). Robert Whittaker and the classification of kingdoms. In J. B. Hagen, D. Allchin, & F. Singer, Doing Biology (pp. 11-22). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(3), 61-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02319858
Luft, J. A. (1999). Teachers’ salient beliefs about a problem solving demonstration classroom in-service program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 141-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<141::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690121307
Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(1), 25-48.
National Research Council. (1995). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teacher Association. (2006, May). NSTA position statement: Professional development in science education. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/profdev.aspx
Opfer, V. D. & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher’s beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pecore, J. L. (2009). A study of secondary teachers facilitating a historical problem-based learning instructional unit. Middle-Secondary Education and Instructional Technology Dissertation. Paper 52. http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/msit_diss?52.
Rhem, J. (1998). Problem-based learning: An introduction. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 8(1), 1-2.
Richardson, V. (2003). The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 401-406.
Savasci, F., & Berlin, D. F. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(1), 65-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9262-z
Savery, J. R,. & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Shaver, A., Cuevas, P., Lee, O., & Avalos, M. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of policy influences on science instruction with culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 725-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20151
Smith, C. A., Powell, S. C., & Wood, E. J. (1995). Problem based learning and problem-solving skills. Biochemical Education, 23(3), 149-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(95)00019-Y
Sonmez, D., & Lee, H. (2003). Problem-Based Learning in Science (ERIC Digest). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED482724)
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Education Research, 27(4), 293-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & White, L. R. (1994, April). CLES: An instrument for monitoring the development of constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Torp, L. & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-12 education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Van Berkel, H. J. M. & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 40(2), 231-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004022116365
Walker, A., Recker, M., Robertshaw, M. B., Olsen, J., Leary, H., Ye, L., & Sellers, L. (2011). Integrating technology and problem-based learning: A mixed methods study of two teacher profes- sional development designs. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2), 70-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1255
Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08327154
Weller, H. and Karp-Boss, L. (2007). Using case studies in science teaching. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/boss/classes/SMS_491_2007/Case%20Studies.pdf.
Weizman, A., Covitt, B. A., Koehler, M. J., Lundeberg, M. A., Oslund, J. A., Low, M. R., Eberhardt, J., & Urban-Lurain, M. (2008). Measuring teachers’ learning from a problem-based learn- ing approach to professional development in science education. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 29-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1081