Creating a Learning Space in Problem-based Learning

Main Article Content

Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver

Abstract

An important aspect of PBL problems is the affordances that they hold for engaging students in discussion of important content knowledge. In this paper, I argue that one can analyze a problem in terms of a deep problem space and a broader learning space to identify the conceptual ideas for potential engagement. The problem space refers to the specific ideas and concepts that are part of the goals of the problem at hand. The learning space includes those aspects of the problem space and also includes the broader space of related conceptual ideas such as the anatomy and physiology related to a particular disorder or the pathology and clinical medicine of other disorders that might be considered as part of a differential diagnosis. This idea is tested in an exploratory analysis of a PBL tutorial conducted by Howard Barrows. The results demonstrate that much of students’ talk is focused in these related conceptual spaces and a substantial amount of the overall learning space is engaged in the group discussion. These results have implications for understanding the affordances of problems and providing another lens on how learning unfolds in a PBL problem. It also provides another means for evaluation of learning and assessment of discursive productivity in PBL groups.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Castanheira, M. L., Green, J. L., & Yeager, E. (2009). Investigating inclusive practices: An interactional ethnographic approach. In K. Kumpalainen, C. E. Hmelo-Silver & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 145–178). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Diemers, A. D., van de Wiel, M. W. J., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., Heineman, H., & Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2011). Pre-clinical patient contacts and the application of biomedical and clinical knowledge. Medical Education, 45(3), 280–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03861.x

Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7

Dolmans, D. H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). What directs self-directed learning in a problem-based curriculum? In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 251–262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Schmidt, H. G., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1995). The relationship between student- generated learning issues and self-study in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 22(4), 251–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00891779

Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a Community of Learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1

Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., Spiro, R. J., & Dawson-Saunders, B. K. (1992). Knowledge applica- tion and transfer for complex tasks in ill-structured domains: Implications for instruction and testing in biomedicine. In D. Evans & V. L. Patel (Eds.), Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice (pp. 213–244). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulsen, R. L. (1993). Learning, teaching, and testing for complex conceptual understanding. In N. Frederiksen, R. J. Mislevy & I. I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 181–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: MacMillan.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2000). Knowledge recycling: Crisscrossing the landscape of educational psychology in a problem-based learning course for preservice teachers. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 11(2&3), 41–56.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Derry, S. J., Bitterman, A., & Hatrak, N. (2009). Targeting transfer in a STELLAR PBL course for pre-service teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning., 3(2), 24–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1055

Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2), 95–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256

Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students’science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 323–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1003_4

Lewis, C. C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.

Lobato, J., Rhodehamel, B., & Hohensee, C. (2012). “Noticing” as an alternative transfer of learning process. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 433–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.682189

Maher, C. A., Landis, J., & Palius, M. F. (2010). Teachers attending to student reasoning: Using videos as tools. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 1–24.

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004

Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Vernon, D. T., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work?: A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68(7), 550–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199307000-00015

Walker, A. E., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 12–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061

Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). What students learning in problem-based learning: A process analysis. Instructional Science, 40(2), 371–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9181-6

Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Strategic facilitation of problem-based discussion for teacher professional development. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 342–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.553258