“I Know This is Supposed to be More Like the Real World, But . . .”: Student Perceptions of a PBL Implementation in an Undergraduate Materials Science Course

Main Article Content

Holly R. Henry
Andrew A. Tawfik
David H. Jonassen
Robert A. Winholtz
Sanjeev Khanna

Abstract

This qualitative case study examines the initial implementation of a problem-based versionof an undergraduate course in materials science for the purpose of identifying areasof improvement to the curriculum prior to a planned second implementation. The coursewas designed around problems that students work in small teams to solve under the guidanceof facilitators, with early sequence problems designed to foster the problem-solvingskills required to succeed in the course. This report describes students’ impressions ofand experiences in the course as they worked to solve the final problem at the end of thesemester and compares those impressions, where applicable, to impressions gatheredafter they had completed the first problem near the beginning of the semester. Usinggrounded theory techniques to analyze the data, six central themes emerged from theimplementation: course structure, facilitation roles, student roles, group processes, coconstruction,and resources. Implications for practice and potential instructional designsolutions that may aid in future implementations are discussed.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3-12. doi:10.1002/tl.37219966804

Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.

Budinski, K. G., & Budinski, M. K. (2002). Engineering materials: Properties and selection (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73-105. doi:10.1111/j.1756- 8765.2008.01005.x

Chiriac, E. H. (2008). A scheme for understanding group processes in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 55(5), 505-518. doi:10.1002/tl.37219966804

Coll, R. K. (2006). The role of models, mental models and analogies in chemistry teaching. In J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (Vol. 30). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1002/tl.37219966804

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dahlgren, M. A. (2000). Portraits of PBL: Course objectives and students’ study strategies in computer engineering, psychology and physiotherapy. Instructional Science, 28(4), 309- 329. doi:10.1002/tl.37219966804

Dahlgren, M. A. (2003). PBL through the looking-glass: Comparing applications in computer engineering, psychology and physiotherapy. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 672-681.

Dahlgren, M. A., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Portraits of PBL: Students’ experiences of the char- acteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology. Instructional Science, 30(2), 111-127. doi:10.1023/A:1014819418051

Dolmans, D. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(4), 321-336. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9012-8

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487

Hendry, G. D., Ryan, G., & Harris, J. (2003). Group problems in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 25(6), 609-616. doi:10.1080/0142159031000137427

Henry, H., Jonassen, D. H., Winholtz, R. A., & Khanna, S. (2010, November 12-18). Challenges of introducing problem-based learning in a materials science course in the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Paper presented at the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada.

Henry, H., Jonassen, D. H., Winholtz, R. A., & Khanna, S. (2011, April 9). “We kind of got pushed off into the deep end”: PBL in undergraduate engineering. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2003). The effects of case libraries on problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 103-114. doi:10.1046/j.0266- 4909.2002.00010.x

Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00010.x

Johnson, P. A. (1999). Problem-based, cooperative learning in the engineering classroom. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125(1), 8. doi:10.1061/ (ASCE)1052-3928(1999)125:1(8)

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.

Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65-77. doi:10.1007/BF02504994

Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.

Khanna, S. (2008). Effectiveness of problem-based learning in a materials science course in the engineering curriculum. NSF Grant Proposal. University of Missouri. Columbia, MO.

Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N., & Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (Second ed., pp. 829-861). Matwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Larusson, J. A., & Alterman, R. (2009). Wikis to support the “collaborative” part of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 371- 402. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9076-6

Mitchell, J. E., & Smith, J. (2008). Case study of the introduction of problem-based learning in electronic engineering. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 45(2), 131-273.

Mitchell, J. E., Smith, J., & Kenyon, A. J. (2005).“It’s not for lazy students like me. . .” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 42(1), 41-51.

Nasr, K. J., & Ramadan, B. H. (2008). Impact assessment of problem-based learning in an engineering science course. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 9(3/4), 16-24.

Ochoa, T. A., & Robinson, J. M. (2005). Revisiting group consensus: Collaborative learning dynamics during a problem-based learning activity in education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(1), 10-20. doi:10.1177/088840640502800102

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557842

Vardi, I., & Ciccarelli, M. (2008). Overcoming problems in problem-based learning: A trial of strategies in an undergraduate unit. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 345-354. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290802377190