I thought this was going to be a waste of time: How portfolio construction can support student learning from project-based experiences
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this work, we sought to understand ways that students experienced a small-scale portfolio assignment provided to them as an opportunity reflect on their experiences in a project-based class. This work was motivated by research in various instructional contexts showing that portfolio construction results in important learning outcomes. We wanted to see if such findings would extend to project-based learning situations in engineering. In addition, our research was motivated by the need to better understand specific portfolio assignments in terms of the effort required of students, the extent and ways in which students value such assignments, and how student overall experiences differ in terms of learning, effort, and value. To address these issues, we interviewed thirteen students who had completed a portfolio assignment as a culminating activity for a project-based manufacturing class. We selected these students because their individual responses to a screening survey suggested that they had had very different experiences with the portfolio assignment. We then conducted open-ended interviews with the students in order to better understand their experiences. In this paper, we show how the themes of epistemically different, manageably effortful, and ultimately valuable can be used to understand three ways of experiencing the assignment (as a significant experience, a muted experience, and a limited experience). This work provides practical information to educators interested in supporting reflection while also contributing the scholarship on how portfolios support learning from experience.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449.
Bartoochi, N. and Keshavarz, M. H. (2002). Assessment of achievement through portfolios and teacher-made tests. Educational Research, 44(3), 279-288.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.
Brown, J. (2002). Know thyself: The impact of portfolio development on adult learning, Adult Education Quarterly, 52(3), 228-245.
Cambridge, D. (2008). Audience, integrity, and the living document: eFolio Minnesota and life-long and lifewide learning with ePortfolios. Computers and Education, 51, 1227-1246.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: MacMillan.
Eccles, J. S. and Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Eliot, M. and Turns, J. (2009, April). Engineering students’ construction of professional identity during professional portfolio creation. Paper presented at the 2009 American Education Research Association National Conference, San Diego.
Gee, J. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-124.
Hofer, B. and Pintrich, P. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. and Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21-39.
Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 55-77.
Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H. and Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 6-28.
Kegan, R. (2000), What "form" transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In J. Mezirow and Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress, (pp. 35-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Klenowski, V. (2000). Portfolios: Promoting teaching. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 215-237.
Kolb, D. A. (1984), Experiential learning experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mezirow, J. (1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 185-198.
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Richardson, J. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53-82.
Rogers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. The Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-866.
Savery, J. R. (2006), Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9-20.
Scholes, J., Webb, C., Gray, M., Endacott, R., Miller, C., Jasper, M., & McMullan, M. (2004). Making portfolios work in practice. Issues and Innovations in Nursing Education, 46(6), 595-603.
Scott, C. and Plumb, C. (1999). Using portfolios to evaluate service courses as part of an engineering writing program. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 337-350.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group.
Svinicki, M. (2004). Learning and motivation in the postsecondary classroom. Bolton, MA: Anker.