Understanding Undergraduate Research Experiences through the Lens of Problem-based Learning: Implications for Curriculum Translation
Main Article Content
Abstract
There has been criticism about STEM education not focusing enough on problem solving, especially in authentic real-world contexts which are most often associated to ill-structured domains. To improve education, it is essential that curricula bring students to high levels of cognitive development by exposing them to authentic problems. Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered pedagogy that offers a strong framework upon which to build a curriculum to teach students essential problem solving skills. An authentic problem solving experience, which is highly valued and promoted outside of the classroom, yet almost non-existent in the classroom is undergraduate research (UR). Herein, the goal was to understand the nature of UR problems and what students learn during these experiences as a means of translating UR problems and experiences into the classroom using PBL methodologies. Using survey design, data was collected from sixty students participating in summer undergraduate research experiences. Our findings revealed UR problems to be well-suited for PBL implementation in the classroom since they are moderately structured and fairly complex because they require students to use many cognitive operations, to integrate multiple domains (knowledge, skills, and attitudes), to work on interdisciplinary teams, to deal with a continuously changing environment, etc.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (2001-2002). Project 2061 Update. Washington, DC: AAAS.
Attrde-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytical tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.
Barrows, H. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springer.
Barrows, H. S. & Tamblyn R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 210-230.
Boyer Commission on Education of Undergraduates in the Research University (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities, New York.
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (2002). Reinvent- ing undergraduate education: Three years after the Boyer Report. S. S. Kenny (chair). State University of New York-Stony Brook.
Celia H. M. (2005) Undergrad research makes a difference: Studies look at the impact of undergraduate research on retention and student outcomes. Chemical and Engineering News, 83(17), 37-38.
Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Cho, K. L. & Jonassen, D.bH. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 50(3), 5-22.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design—Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
Du X., Graaff E. de, & Kolmos A. (2009). Chapter 1: PBL-diversity in research questions and methodologies. In X. Du, E. de Graaff, & A. Kolmos (Eds.), Research on PBL practice in engineering education (pp. 1-7). Boston: Sense Publishers.
Dunkle, M. E., Schraw, G. & Bendixen, L. D. (1995, December). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, California.
Graff, E. de & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. Boston: Sense Publishers.
Graff, E. de & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education. 19(5), 657-662.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education: Research and development in curriculum and instruction. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 221-239.
Hong, N. S., Jonassen, D. H., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 6-33.
Hunter A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students cognitive, personal and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36-74.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design model for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-95.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
Jonassen D. H., Strobel J., Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education 95(2), 139-151.
Jonassen, D. H., Hung, W. (2008) All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 6-28.
Kolmos, A., Graaff E. de, & Du X. (2009). Chapter 2: Diversity of PBL-PBL learning principles and models. In X. Du, E. de Graaff, & A. Kolmos (Eds.), Research on PBL practice in engineering education (pp. 1-7). Boston: Sense Publishers.
Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3: 270-277.
Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D.C. Berlinert & R.C. Cafee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47-62). New York: Macmillan.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE) (2005). Adapting engineering education to the new century educating the engineer of 2020. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
National Science Foundation. (2009). Research experiences for undergraduates. Retrieved October 2009 from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09598/nsf09598.pdf.
National Science Foundation. (1996). New expectations for undergraduate education in sci- ence, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: NSF Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
Pierrakos O., & Trenor, J, (2009, June). Using a mixed-methods approach to investigate students’ perceived learning and challenges faced during a summer undergraduate research experience. Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Austin, TX.
Pierrakos O., Borrego, M., Lo, J. (2008, June). Assessing students’ learning outcomes during summer undergraduate research experiences. Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Pittsburg, PA.
Ravitz, Jason (2009) Introduction: Summarizing findings and looking ahead to a new generation of PBL research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 3(1), 4-11.
Russell S. H. (2005). Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: Survey of STEM graduates. Contributors C. Ailes, M. Hancock, J. McCullough, J. D. Roessner, and C. Storey. (Draft Final Report to the NSF.) Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved March 17, 2007 from http://www.sri.com/policy/csted/reports/.
Russell S. H., Hancock, M. P., McCullough, J. (2007). The Pipeline: Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. AAAS, Science 316, 548-549.
Savery, John R. (2006) Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 1(1), 9-20.
Savin-Baden, M. (2007). Challenging models and perspectives of problem-based learning . In Graff, E. de & Kolmos, A. (Eds.), Management of change; Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering (pp. 9-29). Boston: Sense Publishers.
Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) and Open University Press.
Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 110-16.
Seymour E., Hunter A. B., Laursen S. L., DeAntoni T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493-534.
Simon, D. P. (1978). Information processing theory of human problem solving. In D. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive process (pp. 380-385).. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, M. U. (1991). A view from biology. In M. U. Smith (Ed.), Toward a untied theory of problem solving (pp. 20-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spiro, R., et al. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruc- tion for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Duffy, Thomas M. & Jonassen, David H. (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Trenor J., Pierrakos, O. (2008, June). Utilizing a social cognitive theoretical framework to investigate the influences of a summer undergraduate research experience on participants’ academic and career plans. Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Pittsburg, PA.
U. S. Congress. (2006). America Competes Act. Summary of the America Competes Act. 110th Cong. Retrieved January 7th, 2010 from http://energy.senate.gov/public/_files/SUMMARYOFTHEAMERICACOMPETESACT22607.pdf.
Woods, D. et al. (1997). Developing problem-solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program, Journal of Engineering Education, 2(86), 75-93.
Woods, D. (1994). How to gain most from problem-based learning. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University Press.
Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. (2002a) Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151-157.
Zydney, A., Bennett, J., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. (2002b). Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate research experience in science and engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 291-297.