“We’re doing things that are meaningful”: Student Perspectives of Project-based Learning Across the Disciplines
Main Article Content
Abstract
Supporters of project-based learning (PBL) argue that outcomes from the model include better performance in academic (Bell, 2010; Thomas, 2000) and non-academic outcomes (Saunders-Steward, Gyles, & Shore, 2010). The New Tech Network (NTN) is a school improvement network that provides training and development for high school faculty who commit to using project and/or problem-based learning as the primary instruction methodology (New Tech Network, 2017). This study uses qualitative data to investigate student perspectives of PBL across multiple disciplines at the high school level in NTN schools. Results suggest that students find value in the “hard work” they engaged in whilst completing PBL tasks. Moreover, students can articulate the value of their work and its applicability to a “real-world” setting. We argue that for PBL to work effectively, approaches to PBL from an interdisciplinary perspective must be balanced.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Beldaro, C., Burrows, A. C., & Dambeklans, L. (2017). Partnering science and art: Pre-service teacher’s experiences for use in pre-collegiate classrooms. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(3), 215–263.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83, 39–43.
Borman, G. et al. (2002). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
Boix Mansilla, V., Miller, W., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Boyd, S. & Hipkins, R. (2012). Student inquiry and curriculum integration: Shared origins and points of difference (Part A). Set: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 15–22.
Boykin, A. W., Tyler, K. M., & Miller, O. (2005). In search of cultural themes and their expressions in the dynamics of classroom life. Urban Education, 40(5), 521–549.
Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2011), 132–143.
Comber, B., & Nixon, H. (2009). Teachers’ work and pedagogy in an era of accountability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 333–345.
Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
Corney, G., & Reid, A. (2007). Student teachers learning about subject matter and pedagogy in education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 33–54.
Dabbagh, N., & Blijd, N. D. (2010). Student perceptions of their learning experiences in an authentic instructional design context. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1092
Dewey, J. (1916/2018). Democracy and Education. Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press.
Diamond, J. B. (2012). Accountability policy, school organization, and classroom practice: Partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511431569
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
English, C. M. (2013). The Role of Newly Prepared PBL Teachers’ Motivational Beliefs and Perceptions of School Conditions in Their Project Based Learning Implementation (unpublished doctoral dissertation). George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Fleischman, S., & Heppen, J. (2009). Improving low-performing high schools: Searching for evidence of promise. Future of Children, 19(1), 105–133.
Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, beliefs, and products: Students’ perspectives with project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), Article 6.
Hammond, D. J. (2017). An investigation into the impact of an integrated curriculum on learning in the primary school. (Doctoral thesis). Durham University. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12025/
Huberman, M., Bitter, C., Anthony, J., & O’Day, J. (2014). The shape of deeper learning: Strategies, structures, and cultures in deeper learning network high schools. The American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/Report%201%20The%20Shape%20of%20Deeper%20 Learning_9-23-14v2.pdf
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1
Jickling, B. (2003). Environmental education and environmental advocacy: Revisited. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(2), 20–27.
Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into practice, 34(3), 159–165.
Martelli, C. D., & Watson, P. (2016). Project-based learning: Investigating resilience as the connection between history, community, and self. Voices from the Middle, 23(3), 10–16.
McPhail, G. (2018). Curriculum integration in the senior secondary school: a case study in a national assessment context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1386234
Mehta, J. (2014). Deeper learning has a race problem. Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/learning_deeply/2014/06/deeper_learning_has_a_race_problem.html
Mitra, D. (2007). Student voice in school reform: From listening to leadership. In D. Thiessen and A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School (pp.727–744). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: edweek.org/edweek/learning_deeply/2014/06/deeper_learning_has_a_race_problem.html
Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education— Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 2–16. Retrieved from http://www.aaee.com/au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03/pdf
Mosier, G. G., Bradley-Levine, J., & Perkins, T. (2016). Students’ perceptions of project-based learning within the New Tech school model. International Journal of Educational Reform, 25(1), 2–14.
Nariman, N. & Chrispeels, J. (2016). PBL in the era of reform standards: Challenges and benefits perceived by teachers in one elementary school. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), Article 5.
New Tech Network. (November, 2016). “Who We Are.” Retrieved from https://newtechnetwork.org/who-we-are/ New Tech Network. (2017). New Tech Network Schools: Preparing Students for College and Career. Retrieved from https://32dkl02ezpk0qcqvqmlx19lk-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/NTN_Data_Report_Companion_Piece-spreads.pdf
Palmer, S., & Hall, W. (2011). An evaluation of a project- based learning initiative in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.593095
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Perkins-Gough, D. (2013). The significance of grit: A conversation with Angela Lee Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 14–20.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.
Saldaña, J. (2009). A coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Saunders-Stewart, K. S., Gyles, P. D., & Shore, B. M. (2012). Student outcomes in inquiry instruction: A literature-derived inventory. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 5–31.
Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for problem-based learning: The student perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771.1541-5015.1135
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., Bunting, C. F. (2013). Problem-based learning: Influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Education Engineering, 100(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013