Implementing and Evaluating a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) at a Hispanic-Serving Institution
Main Article Content
Abstract
We are examining the impact of a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) at a land-grant, Hispanic-serving institution in the southwestern United States. Students in our CURE completed one or two extended research projects over a single semester. Our CURE enrolled a high proportion of underrepresented minority students (70.3%), including 60.2% Hispanic students. One year after CURE completion, 31.5% of CURE students had graduated with a STEM degree, and 54.3% were enrolled in a STEM major. Pre- and postcourse surveys of indicators of persistence including scientific self-efficacy, scientific identity, valuing scientific community objectives, and intention to persist showed positive shifts. Impacts on STEM persistence have implications for the role of our CURE in diversifying the STEM pipeline, particularly for students historically underrepresented in STEM.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Allchin, D. 2013. Problem- and case-based learning in science: An introduction to distinctions, values, and outcomes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12, 364–372.
Auchincloss, L., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., . . . Dolan, E. L. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 29–40.
Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 602–606.
Bascom-Slack, C. A., Arnold, E., & Strobel, S. A. (2012). Student-directed discovery of the plant microbiome and its products. Science, 338, 485–486. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215227
Bass, R. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: What’s the problem? inventio, 1(1).
Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., Seawell, P. C., Imam, J. F., Eddy, S. L., . . . Cyert, M. S. (2015). A high- enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092
Brownell, S. E., & Kloser, M. J. (2015). Toward a conceptual framework for measuring the effectiveness of course-based undergraduate research experiences in undergraduate biology. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 525–544.
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 469–491.
Corwin, L., Graham, M. J., & Dolan, E. (2015). Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: An agenda for future research and evaluation. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–13.
Corwin, L., Runyon, C., Ghanem, E., Sandy, M., Clark, G., Palmer, G., . . . Dolan, E. (2018). Effects of discovery, iteration, and collaboration in laboratory courses on undergraduates’ research career intentions fully mediated by student ownership. CBE-Life Sciences Education 17:1r20.
Dolan, E. L. (2016). Course-based undergraduate research experiences: Current knowledge and future directions. Paper commissioned for the Committee on Strengthening Research Experiences for Undergraduate STEM Students. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Board on Life Sciences, Division of Earth and Life Studies. Retrieved from http://nas.edu/STEM_Undergraduate_Research_CURE
Elgin, S., Bangera, G., Decatur, S. M., Dolan, E. L., Guertin, L., Newstetter, W. C. . . . Labov, J. B. (2016). Insights from a convocation: Integrating discovery-based research into the undergraduate curriculum. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15, 1–7.
Ertmer, P. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2018). Problem-based learning: Essential design characteristics. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design & technology (4th ed., pp. 286–295). New York, NY: Pearson.
Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P., & Schultz, P. W. (2011). Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. J. Educ Psychol, 103(1), 216–222.
Frantz, K. J., Demetrikopoulos, M. K., Britner, S. L., Carruth, L. L., Williams, B. A., Pecore, J. L., . . . Goode, C. T. (2017). A comparison of internal dispositions and career trajectories after collaborative versus apprenticed research experiences for undergraduates. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 16(ar1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-06-0206
Fukami. T. (2013). Integrating inquiry-based teaching with faculty research. Science, 339, 1536–1537.
Harvey, P. A., Wall, C., Luckey, S. W., Langer, S., & Leinwand, L. A. (2014). The Python Project: A unique model for extending research opportunities to undergraduate students. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 698–710.
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2018). What is a case study? Evid Based Nurs, 21, 7–8.
Hernandez, P., Wesley Schultz, P., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. J. Educ Psychol, 105(1), 89–107.
Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1604
Hunter, A-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal , and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
Jordan, T. C., Burnett, S. H., Carson, S., Caruso, S. M., Clase, K., DeJong, R. J. . . . Hatfull, G. F. (2014). A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio, 5(1), e01051-13.
Kloser, M. J., Brownell, S. E., Chiariello, N. R., & Fukami, T. (2011). Integrating teaching and research in undergraduate laboratory education. PLoS Biol, 9(11), e1001174. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001174
Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. CBE, 3, 270–277.
Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6, 297–306.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17-310. Arlington, VA. Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
Office of Institutional Analysis, New Mexico State University. Retrieved September 9, 2018, from Factbooks. https://oia.nmsu.edu/data-reports/factbooks/
Olimpo, J. T., Fisher, G. R., & DeChenne-Peters, S. E. (2016). Development and evaluation of the Tigriopus course-based undergraduate research experience: Impacts on students’ content knowledge, attitudes, and motivation in a majors introductory biology course. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(ar72). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-11-0228
Pierrakos, O., Zilberberg, A., & Anderson, R. (2010). Understanding undergraduate research experiences through the lens of problem-based learning: Implications for curriculum translation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1103
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
Rodenbusch. S. E., Hernandez, P. E., Simmons, S. L., & Dolan, E. L. (2016). Early engagement in course-based research increases graduation rates and completion of science, engineering, and mathematics degrees. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15, 1–10.
SEA-PHAGES. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://seaphages.org/.
Seymour, E., Hunter, A-B., Laursen, S., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Sci Ed, 88, 493–534.
Shaffer, C. D., Alvarez, C. J., Bednarski, A. E., Dunbar, D., Goodman, A. L., Reinke, C. . . . Elgin, S. C. R. (2014). A course-based research experience: How benefits change with increased investment in instructional time. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-08-0152
Shanle, E., Tsun, I., & Strahl, B. (2016). A course-based undergraduate research experience investigating p300 bromodomain mutations. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(1), 68–74.
Shortlidge, E. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). How to assess your CURE: A practical guide for instructors of course-based undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 17(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1103
Small World Initiative. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from http://www.smallworldinitiative.org/.
Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L., & Hunter, A-B. (2011). What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 357–388.
University of Texas at Austin, College of Natural Sciences. (2018). Freshman Research Initiative. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from https://cns.utexas.edu/fri/about
Villarejo, M., Barlow, A. E., Kogan, D., Veazey, B. D., & Sweeney, J. K. (2008). Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: Career path survey results. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 394–409.