Main Article Content
In this study, a problem-based capstone course was designed to assess the University of Wyoming Microbiology Program’s skill-based and process-based student learning objectives. Students partnered with a local farm, a community garden, and a free downtown clinic in order to conceptualize, propose, perform, and present studies addressing problems experienced by these partners. Instructor assessments enabled understanding of student competencies, and according to external subject matter experts students demonstrated mastery of all learning objectives on the final research presentation. Community partners were completely satisfied with the students’ solutions, professionalism, and communication. Instructional diagnosis and student course evaluations showed satisfaction, engagement, and growth. Assessments enabled reflective practice by faculty and led to improvements of the capstone course and the microbiology program. Consequently, the course gained institutional support and an official course listing.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541
Allen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.465
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Baker, N. (2016). ASM’s curriculum recommendations: Microbiology majors program. Retrieved March 14, 2016, from http://www.asm.org/index.php/education/undergraduate-faculty/curriculum-resources-and-publications/29-education/undergraduate-faculty/223-asms-curriculum-recommendations-microbiology-majors-program
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guz- dial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, A. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, J. D., . . . Smith, T. L. (2015). University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Nature, 523(7560), 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/523282a
Butler, A., Phillman, K. B., & Smart, L. (2001). Active learning within a lecture: Assessing the impact of short, in-class writing exercises. Teaching of Psychology, 28(4), 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2804_04
Coffman, S. J. (1991). Improving your teaching through small-group diagnosis. College Teaching, 39(2), 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1991.9925493
Crawford, P., Lang, S., Fink, W., Dalton, R., & Dielitz, L. (2011). Comparative analysis of soft skills: What is important for new graduates? Perceptions of Employers, Alum, Faculty and Students. East Lansing, MI: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU) and Univer- sity Industry Consortium (UIC).
Downing, K., Kwong, T., Chan, S., Lam, T., & Downing, W. (2009). Problem-based learning and the development of metacognition. Higher Education, 57(5), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9165-x
Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for profession. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504858
Eppes, T. A., Milanovic, I., & Sweitzer, H. F. (2012). Strengthening capstone skills in STEM programs. Innovative Higher Education, 37(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9181-0
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performances in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Friedland, A. J., & Folt, C. L. (2009). Writing successful science proposals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Gilbert, M. K. (2010). Educated in agency: A feminist service-learning pedagogy for community border crossings (Doctoral dissertation). Boston College, Boston, MA. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1814
Gonyea, R., Anderson, P., Anson, C., & Paine, C. (2010). Powering up your WAC program: Practical, productive ways to use assessment data from NSSE’s consortium for the study of writing in college. Paper presented at the 10th International Writing across the Curriculum Conference, Bloomington, IN.
Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific Teaching. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Hooker, E. (2005). Rubric for the holistic assessment of critical thinking across the curriculum. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from https://valenciacollege.edu/learningevidence/documents/ThinkRubricforHolisticAssessmentJune102005.pdf
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II) (pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1080
Kanare, H. (1985). Writing the Laboratory Notebook. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Leonard, H. S., & Marquardt, M. J. (2010). The evidence for the effectiveness of action learning. Action Learning: Reaserch and Practice, 7(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2010.488323
Malcom, S. M., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2016). Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students’ Diverse Pathways. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First Principles of Instruction. Educational Research Training and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
Murray, J., & Summerlee, A. (2007). The impact of problem- based learning in an interdisciplinary first-year program on student learning behaviour. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37.3(2007), 87–107.
Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II) (pp. 241–267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Roy, D. (2004). Feminist theory in science: Working toward a practical transformation. Hypatia, 19(1), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01277.x
Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate reaserch experiences. Science, 316(5824), 548–549. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140384
Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Designing constructivist learning environments (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, CA: Educational Technology Publications.
Simon, G., Wee, B., Chin, A., Tindle, A., Guth, D., & Mason, H. (2013). Synthesis for the interdisciplinary environmental sciences: Integrating systems approaches and service learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 42–49.
Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x
Spektor-Levy, O., Eylon, B.-S., & Scherz, Z. (2009). Teaching scientific communication skills in science studies: Does it make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 875–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9150-6
Taylor, J. L., Smith, K. M., van Stolk, A. P., & Spiegelman, G. B. (2010). Using invention to change how students tackle problems. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-02-0012
Waldrop, M. M. (2015). The Science of Teaching Science. Nature, 523(7560), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/523272a
Wolf, D. P. (1993). Assessment as an episode of learning. In R. E. Bennet & W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.