Main Article Content
Promoting and sustaining effective discussion—that which contributes to learning—is a skill that eludes many instructors (Darling-Hammond, 2008; Ge, Yamashiro, & Lee, 2000). This study explored the role and strategies of an expert instructor in an online advanced instructional design (ID) course that utilized a case-based learning (CBL) approach. Discussion posts, as well as interview data, were analyzed and coded to explore how the instructor utilized three strategies noted as being critical to students’ learning during problem-centered discussions: social congruence, cognitive congruence, and content expertise (Schmidt & Moust, 1995; Yew & Yong, 2014). Results showed that facilitation choices were made with course goals in mind: modeling the case analysis process and improving students’ ID problem solving. All three strategies were used frequently during discussion facilitation. Strategies tended to be implemented in clusters, with social congruence strategies appearing in every post but four. Implications are discussed for utilizing a combination of these facilitation strategies, in a dynamic manner, within a case-based context.
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
Ainley, M., & Armatas, C. (2006). Motivational perspectives on students’ responses to learning in virtual learning environments. In J. Weiss (Ed.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 365–394). Netherlands: Springer.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. Newburyport, MA.
An, Y. (2013) Systematic design of blended PBL: Exploring the design experiences and support needs of PBL novices in an online environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 61–79.
Anderson, E., & Schiano, B. (2014). Teaching with cases: A practical guide. Harvard Business Press.
Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 463–482.
Berliner, D. C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Çam, A., & Geban, Ö. (2011). Effectiveness of case-based learning instruction on epistemological beliefs and attitudes toward chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 26–32.
Carder, L., Willingham, P., & Bibb, D. (2001). Case-based, problem-based learning: Information literacy for the real world. Research strategies, 18(3), 181–190.
Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 61–79.
Chaplin, S. (2009). Assessment of the impact of case studies on student learning gains in an introductory biology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(1), 72–80.
Chng, E., Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Effects of tutor-related behaviours on the process of problem-based learning. Advances in Health Science Education, 16, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9282-7
Collins, A., & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dabbagh, N. H., Jonassen, D. H., Yueh, H. P., & Sanouiloua, M. (2000). Assessing a problem-based learning approach to an introductory instructional design course: a case study. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2000.tb00176.x.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, E., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 265–272.
Davis, W. K., Nairn, R., Paine, M. E., Anderson, R. M., & Oh, M. S. (1992). Effects of expert and non-expert facilitators on the small-group process and on student performance. Academic Medicine, 67, 470–474.
Dolmans, D. H., Gijselaers, W. H., Moust, J. H., Grave, W. S. D., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Vleuten, C. P. V. D. (2002). Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: Conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 173–180.
Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. A. (2014). Online case discus- sions: Examining coverage of the afforded problem space. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 617–636.
Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. A. (2015). Facilitated versus non-facilitated online case discussions: Comparing differences in problem space coverage. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27, 69–93.
Ertmer, P. A., & Stepich, D. A. (2002). Initiating and maintaining meaningful case discussions: Maximizing the potential of case-based instruction. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 13(1/3), 5–18.
Ertmer, P. A., & Stepich, D. A. (2005). Instructional design expertise: How will we know it when we see it? Educational Technology, 45(6), 38–43.
Flynn, A. E., & Klein, J. D. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0250491
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Ge, X., Yamashiro, K., & Lee, J. (2000). Pre-class planning to scaffold students for online collaborative learning activities. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 1–16.
Gertzman, A., & Kolodner, J. L. (1996). A case study of problem-based learning in a middle-school science class: Lessons learned. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 91–98). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
Gilkison, A. (2003). Techniques used by “expert”and “non‐expert”tutors to facilitate problem‐based learning tutorials in an undergraduate medical curriculum. Medical Education, 37(1), 6–14.
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436–445.
Groves, M., Régo, P., & O’Rourke, P. (2005). Tutoring in problem-based learning medical curricula: The influence of tutor background and style on effectiveness. BMC Med- ical Education, 5(1), 20.
Hashweh, M. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11, 273–292.
Heckman, R. & Annabi, H. (2006). How the teacher’s role changes in online case study discussion. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(2), 141–150.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1). Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol7/iss1/
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.
Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247–298. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_2
Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65–77.
Kaddoura, M. A. (2011). Critical thinking skills of nursing students in lecture-based teaching and case-based learning. Learning, 5(2), 20.
Kassab, S., Al-Shboul, Q., Abu-Hijleh, M., & Hamdy, H. (2006). Teaching styles of tutors in a problem based curriculum: Students’ and tutors’ perception. Medical Teacher, 28, 460–464. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600627540
Kanuka, H. (2011). Interaction and the online distance classroom: Do instructional methods effect the quality of interaction? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 143–156.
Kaufman, D. M., & Holmes, D. B. (1996). Tutoring in problem-based learning: Perceptions of teachers and students. Medical Education, 30(5), 371–377.
Kolodner, J. L., Hmelo, C. E., & Narayanan, N. H. (1996). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 188–195). Evanston, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., & Gurtner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 75–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Levin, B. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63–79.
Lewandowski, J., van Barneveld, A., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). Posting with intentionality in online instruction: Supporting instructors’ facilitation efforts. Educational Technology, 56(4), 15–21.
Lockspeiser, T. M., O’Sullivan, P., Teherani, A., & Muller, J. (2008). Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: The value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 361–372.
Lowenthal, A., Lowenthal, P. R. (2010, April). A mixed methods examination of instructor social presence in accelerated online course. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Education Research Association, Denver, CO.
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94, 203–229.
Mitchem, K., Fitzgerald, G., Hollingsead, C., Koury, K., Miller, K., & Tsai, H.-H. (2008). Enhancing case-based learning in teacher education through online discussions: Structure and facilitation. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 331–349.
O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1992). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318–335.
Otani, K., Kim, B. J., & Cho, J. I. (2012). Student evaluation of teaching (SET) in higher education: How to use SET more effectively and efficiently in public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 531–544.
Papinczak, T. (2010). An exploration of perceptions of tutor evaluation in problem-based learning tutorials. Medical Education, 44(9), 892–899.
Rangan, V. (1996). Choreographing a case class. Harvard Business School Publishing. Ref. # 9-595-074.
Redmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. ASCILITE Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Redmond-full.pdf
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304.
Richardson, J. C., & Alsup, J. (2015). From the classroom to the keyboard: How seven teachers created their online teacher identities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 142–167.
Richardson, J., Koehler, A. A., Besser, E. D., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 256–297.
Rico R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2015). Examining the Role of the Instructor in Problem-centered Instruction. TechTrends, 59(4), 96–103.
Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 397– 431). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 37–42.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.
Savin-Baden, M. (2003). Facilitating problem-based learning: Illuminating perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2004). Scaffolding problem-based teaching in a traditional social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 32, 349–378.
Schmidt, H. G. (1994). Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research: Does lack of structure cause students to seek tutor guidance? Academic Medicine, 69, 656–662.
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91–97.
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equation modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708–714.
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 19–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schmidt, H. G., Van der Arend, A., Moust, J. H., Kokx, I., & Boon, L. (1993). Influence of tutors’ subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 68, 784–91.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Merill/Prentice-Hall.
Stepich, D. A., Ertmer, P. A., & Lane, M. M. (2001). Problem- solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 53–67.
Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28.
van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 227–269.
Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1996). Computer and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10(1), 47–64.
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based learning: Influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 253–280.
Yadav, A., Vinh, M., Shaver, G. M., Meckl, P., & Firebaugh, S. (2014). Case-based instruction: Improving students’ conceptual understanding through cases in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 659–677.
Yew, E. H. J., & Yong, J. J. Y. (2014). Student perceptions of facilitators’ social congruence, use of expertise, and cognitive congruence in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 42, 795–815.