Problem-Based Learning in K–8 Mathematics and Science Education: A Literature Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
This systematic literature review was conducted to explore the effectiveness of problem-based and project-based learning (PBL) implemented with students in early elementary to grade 8 (ages 3–14) in mathematics and science classrooms. Nine studies met the following inclusion criteria: (a) focus on PBL, (b) experimental study, (c) kindergarten to grade 8 level, and (d) focus on mathematics or science content. For these studies, we examined: the definitions of PBL used, the components of PBL explicitly identified as salient to student learning, and the effectiveness of PBL. This review found that although there is no consistent definition of PBL, PBL is an effective method for improving K–8 students’ science academic achievement, including knowledge retention, conceptual development, and attitudes. Implications and limitations are discussed.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
Akınoğlu, O., & Tandoğan. R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 71–81.
Araz, G., & Sungur, S. (2007). Effectiveness of problem‐based learning on academic performance in genetics. Biochem- istry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(6), 448–451.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Classrooms and staff rooms: The sociology of teachers and teaching (pp. 36–47). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1976). An evaluation of problem-based learning in small groups utilizing a simulated patient. Journal of Medical Education, 51(1), 52–54.
Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.Bell, J. (2010). Doing your research project. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bennett, J., Campbell, B., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2007). A systematic review of the effects on high school students of context-based and science-technology (STS) approaches to the teaching of science. York, UK: Department of Educa- tional Studies, The University of York.
Boyce, M. C., & Singh, K. (2008). Student learning and evaluation in analytical chemistry using a problem-oriented approach and portfolio assessment. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(12), 1633.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (2001). In search for understanding the case for constructivist classrooms. Upper Sad- dle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, and J. Morgan (Eds.), Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathemat- ics (STEM) approach (2nd ed., pp. 1–6). Rotterdam, Neth- erlands: Sense.
Chen, C. H., & Chen, C. Y. (2012). Instructional approaches on science performance, attitude and inquiry ability in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 11(1), 113–122.
Colley, K. E. (2008). Project-based science instruction: A primer. The Science Teacher, 75(8), 23–28.
Curry, J. J. (2002). Problem-based learning pathway student handbook. Columbus: The Ohio State University, College of Medicine and Public Health.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
Didem, I. E., & Balım, A. G. (2010, December). The effects of using problem-based learning in science and technology teaching upon students’ academic achievement and levels of structuring concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 11(2).
Drake, K. N., & Long, D. (2009). Rebecca’s in the dark: A comparative study of problem-based learning and direct instruction/experiential learning in two 4th-grade classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(1), 1–16.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182.
English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 128–150.
Gallagher, S. A., & Stepien, W. J. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 136–147.
Gallagher, S. A., & Stepien, W. J. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(3), 257–275.
Gijbels, D., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2009). Constructivist learning (environments) and how to avoid another tower of Babel: Reply to Renkl. Instructional Science, 37(5), 499–502.
Gould, K., & Sadera, W. (2015). Evaluation of health profession student attitudes toward an online nutrition education problem-based learning module. International Journal of Online Learning, 14(2), 181–198.
Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 383–396.
Holliday, W. G. (2006). A balanced approach to science inquiry teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 201–217). Dordrecht: Springer.
Howard, J. (2002). Technology-enhanced project-based learning in teacher education: Addressing the goals of transfer. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 343–364.
Hsu, L. (2004). Developing concept maps from problem- based learning scenario discussions. Issues and Innovations in Nursing Education, 48(5), 510–518.
Karaçalli, S., & Korur, F. (2014). The effects of project‐based learning on students’ academic achievement, attitude, and retention of knowledge: The subject of “electricity in our lives.” School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 224–235.
Kim, H. K., VanTassel-Baska, J., Bracken, B. A., Feng, A., Stambaugh, T., & Bland, L. (2012). Project Clarion: Three years of science instruction in title I schools among k-third grade students. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 813–829.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, W. R., Bass, M. K., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 313–350.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Kwon, O. N., Park, J. H., & Park, J. S. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51–61.
Leuchter, M., Saalbach, H., & Hardy, I. (2014). Designing science learning in the first years of schooling: An intervention study with sequenced learning material on the topic of “floating and sinking.” International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1751–1771.
Macbeth, D. (2000). On an actual apparatus for conceptual change. Science Education, 84(2), 228–264.
Namy, L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 5–15.
Nowak, J. A. (2001). The implications and outcomes of using problem-based learning to teach middle school science (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Potvin, P., Mercier, J., Charland, P., & Riopel, M. (2012). Does classroom explication of initial conceptions favour conceptual change or is it counter-productive? Research in Science Education, 42(3), 401–414.
Quinn, K. A., & Albano, L. D. (2008). Problem-based learning in structural engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 134(4), 329–334.
Rico, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2015). Examining the role of the instructor in problem-centered instruction. TechTrends, 59(4), 96–103.
Savin-Baden, M., & Wilkie, K. (2006). Possibilities and challenges. In M. Savin-Baden (Ed.), Problem-based learning online (pp. 105–126). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Singer, J., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.
Stepien, W. J., & Gallagher, S. A. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25–28.
Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.
Taber, K. S. (2000). Chemistry lessons for universities?: A review of constructivist ideas. University Chemistry Education, 4(2), 63–72.
Tarhan, L., & Acar, B. (2007). Problem-based learning in an eleventh grade chemistry class: “Factors affecting cell potential.” Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 351–369.
Trinter, C. P., Moon, T. R., & Brighton, C. M. (2015). Characteristics of students’ mathematical promise when engaging with problem-based learning units in primary classrooms. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26(1), 24–58.
Tseng, K. H., Chiang, F. K., & Hsu, W. H. (2008). Interactive processes and learning attitudes in a web-based problem based learning (PBL) platform. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(3), 940–955.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Palmer Press.
Walton, H. J., & Mathews, M. B. (1989). Essentials of problem-based learning, Medical Education, 23(6), 542–558. Wong, K. K. H., & Day, J. R. (2009). A comparative study of problem-based and lecture-based learning in junior secondary school science. Research in Science Educa- tion, 39(5), 625–642.
Yenal, H., İra, N., & Oflas, B. (2003). Etkin öğrenme modeli olarak: Soruna dayalı öğrenme ve yüksek öğretimde uygulanması. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 117–126.
Zubaidah, S. (2005). Problem-based learning: Literature review. Singapore Nursing Journal, 32(4), 50–55.