STEM High School Teachers’ Views of Implementing PBL: An Investigation Using Anecdote Circles
Main Article Content
Abstract
Problem-based learning (PBL) has been gaining in popularity, especially within the context of STEM-based (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) schools. Program assessments for these schools typically focus on student standardized test scores rather than the needs of the teachers. This study utilized anecdote circles, storytelling via moderated group discussions, to investigate teachers’ needs related to developing and implementing authentic, interdisciplinary PBL activities in an urban, public STEM high school. Teacher experiences and viewpoints were explored within three broad themes: assessment; coaching and training; and authentic learning. The analyses provide insights for transitioning a school for effective PBL implementation as well as improving teaching and learning best practices. Recommendations to improve PBL practice based on the study’s results are also included.
Article Details
1. Publication and Promotion: In consideration of the Publisher’s agreement to publish the Work, Author hereby grants and assigns to Publisher the non-exclusive right to print, publish, reproduce, or distribute the Work throughout the world in all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format, and to market or sell the Work orany part of it as Publisher sees fit. Author further grants Publisher the right to use Author’s name in association with the Work inpublished form and in advertising and promotional materials
2. Copyright: Copyright of the Work remains in Author’s name.
3. Prior Publication and Attribution: Author agrees not to publish the Work in print form prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher. Author agrees to cite, by author, title, and publisher, the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication when publishing the Work elsewhere
4. Author Representations: The Author represents and warrants that the Work:
(a) is the Author’s original Work and that Author has full power to enter into this Agreement;
(b) does not infringe the copyright or property of another;
(c) contains no material which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or previously published, in whole or in part.
Author shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss of expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
5. Licensing and Reuse: Reuse of the published Work will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon the Work non-commercially; although new works must acknowledge the original Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning publication and be non-commercial, they do not have to be licensed on the same terms.
References
An, Y. (2013). Systematic design of blended PBL: Exploring the design experiences and support needs of PBL novices in an online environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 61–79.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804
Boyer-Stephens, A., & Miller, M. (2000). A problem-based learning professional development training program for career/technical education instructors. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 23(1), 10–16.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319859
Callahan, S., Rixon, A., & Shenk, M. (2006). The ultimate guide to anecdote circles. Retrieved from http://www.anecdote.com.au
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K–12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 40–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005
Grant, M. M., & Hill, J. R. (2006). Weighing the risks with the rewards: Implementing student-centered pedagogy within high stakes testing. In C. J. McCarthy & R. G. Lambert (Eds.), Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability (pp. 19–42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
LaForce, M., & Rand, S. (2012). State of the STEM school address, National Inventor’s Hall of Fame School, Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Learning, February 23, 2012. (unpublished report). The University of Chicago, Center for Elementary Mathematics and Science Education.
McNeil, K. A., Newman, I., & Steinhauser, J. (2005). How to be involved in program evaluation: What every administrator needs to know. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
Meyrick, K. M. (2011). How STEM education improves student learning. Meridian K-12 School Computer Technologies Journal, 14(1).
O’Toole, P., Talbot, S., & Fidock, J. (2008). Anecdotally speaking: Using stories to generate organisational change. Qualitative Research Journal, 8(2), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0802028
Ramaswamy, R., Storer, G., & Van Zeyl, R. (2005). Designing sustainable communities of practice at CARE. KM4D Journal, 1(1), 79–93.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Savery, J. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 5(7), 25–28.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Strobel, J. & Barneveld, A. V. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046
Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K–16 education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Torp, L., & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K–12 education. Alexandria, VA: Asso- ciation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.